Anna Paulina Luna engagement report
@realannapaulina - 961K followers on X
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 961K followers, an engagement rate of 0.205%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 3.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tag: #thesecretarykennedypodcast.
Compared with accounts its own size
Anna Paulina Luna's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.205%, Anna Paulina Luna sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 56% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 9% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 136 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 16, 202613x their median
Sharia Law is INCOMPATIBLE with the US Constitution.
- Aug 30, 20267.5x their median
We wanted to designate ANTIFA as a domestic terror org and got pushback on it. Looks like we were right after all. 💡 https://t.co/EVo7BWvkkS
- Aug 28, 20266.3x their median
𝕏 reveals it uncovered a Chinese bot farm of roughly 200,000 accounts. As I have stated before a bots are a problem and the divide that you’re seeing in this country is largely manufactured by foreign countries like China.
- Aug 30, 20266.3x their median
A nation NOT dependent on pesticides is a healthy one. 🫶🏻🌱🇺🇸 https://t.co/qWnd7FakAi
- Aug 30, 20266.1x their median
First time and had a total blast. ☀️ https://t.co/vfqp865gZL
- Aug 18, 20266.0x their median
Cap federal student loan interest at 2% and let borrowers pay off what they owe instead of drowning in a predatory federal debt trap. https://t.co/1c03dk5xFw
- Aug 19, 20264.9x their median
If you accepted a journalism award for your Russiagate coverage and you have not returned the prize after finding out - beyond any doubt - that Russia collusion was a Democrat hoax, you are not a journalist. And you know it.
- Aug 15, 20264.8x their median
It’s campaign season and I will win! Our polling has us up by a solid lead! Thank you to everyone who has continued to support me for Congress. Get out and #vote this week and again in November! Ps. could not think of a better artist’s song to use other the amazing @NICKIMINAJ 🫶🏻🏆✨
- Oct 11, 20264.1x their median
EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD BE SUPPORTING @POTUS’ negotiated ceasefire ref Russia and Ukraine.
- Aug 19, 20263.5x their median
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Says CHINA is FUNDING Democrat Socialist Candidates "DSA is absolutely funded and tied to the Communist Chinese Party. We know, for instance, in their mega donors like Neville Roy Singham, who are currently under investigation by the Department of Justice" This is insane.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 961K followers, an engagement rate of 0.205%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 3.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
- What is Anna Paulina Luna's engagement rate on X?
- Anna Paulina Luna (@realannapaulina) has an engagement rate of 0.205%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 960,941 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.205%, Anna Paulina Luna sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @realannapaulina have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @realannapaulina post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.