ruben sim🇷🇪 engagement report
@realRubenSim - 378K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 735 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.194%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #art, #artists, #digitalart.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #art, #artists, #digitalart.
Compared with accounts its own size
ruben sim🇷🇪's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.194%, ruben sim🇷🇪 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 25% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 58 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 5, 20262.2x their median
mfs in my mentions be like "nsfw dni" then follow porn accounts
- Sep 19, 20262.1x their median
DEADMANSSWITCH1: 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809
- Aug 30, 20261.6x their median
PSA: A scam game called Just DONATE is claiming to be affiliated with EASI. The game scams players with a fake player-to-player Robux donation feature. In reality, when you try to make a donation the game just pockets your Robux and gives nothing to the other player. When players call this out, the developers ban them and claim they were flagged by the EASI system. The game doesn't even have access to EASI. Game ID: 78960503694394 Group ID: 741979648 Owner ID: 10989483494
- Sep 30, 2026
judge me by my enemies
- Sep 30, 2026
nitrolord vid comes out tomorrow https://t.co/hgUQRV9FzH
- Oct 3, 2026
did anyone save that "YOU'RE NOT OG" roblox vid cause the op took it down
- Oct 10, 2026
Is there a single person who's won a ban appeal through ADR/MIDR? https://t.co/FJZ1XOvHs8
- Sep 26, 2026
test
- Jul 26, 2026
New EASI Ban Appeal Form: https://t.co/ry7WHcqWVV
- Sep 21, 2026
Im getting over my fear of Granny, please help me https://t.co/2ae5d62pUl
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 735 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.194%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #art, #artists, #digitalart.
- What is ruben sim🇷🇪's engagement rate on X?
- ruben sim🇷🇪 (@realRubenSim) has an engagement rate of 0.194%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 378,033 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.194%, ruben sim🇷🇪 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @realRubenSim have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @realRubenSim post?
- Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.