Back to @realRubenSim's profile

ruben sim🇷🇪 engagement report

@realRubenSim - 378K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.194%
of 378K followers
Per impression
1.10%
67K views on a typical post
Reach
17.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
735
interactions (median)
Saved
0.082%
55 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 735 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.194%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #art, #artists, #digitalart.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #art, #artists, #digitalart.

Compared with accounts its own size

ruben sim🇷🇪's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.194%, ruben sim🇷🇪 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 58 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 20262.2x their median

    mfs in my mentions be like "nsfw dni" then follow porn accounts

    1.5K6134183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.1x their median

    DEADMANSSWITCH1: 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    1.4K239012136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.6x their median

    PSA: A scam game called Just DONATE is claiming to be affiliated with EASI. The game scams players with a fake player-to-player Robux donation feature. In reality, when you try to make a donation the game just pockets your Robux and gives nothing to the other player. When players call this out, the developers ban them and claim they were flagged by the EASI system. The game doesn't even have access to EASI. Game ID: 78960503694394 Group ID: 741979648 Owner ID: 10989483494

    1.1K6742493K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    judge me by my enemies

    9023549635K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    nitrolord vid comes out tomorrow https://t.co/hgUQRV9FzH

    8083739351K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    did anyone save that "YOU'RE NOT OG" roblox vid cause the op took it down

    55612132220K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026

    Is there a single person who's won a ban appeal through ADR/MIDR? https://t.co/FJZ1XOvHs8

    5252231023K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    test

    4831754326K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 2026

    New EASI Ban Appeal Form: https://t.co/ry7WHcqWVV

    3149894248K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Im getting over my fear of Granny, please help me https://t.co/2ae5d62pUl

    95252120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#art#artists#digitalart#navy898#roblox

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 735 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.194%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #art, #artists, #digitalart.

What is ruben sim🇷🇪's engagement rate on X?
ruben sim🇷🇪 (@realRubenSim) has an engagement rate of 0.194%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 378,033 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.194%, ruben sim🇷🇪 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @realRubenSim have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @realRubenSim post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going