Romantica engagement report
@readromantica - 68K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 68K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 1.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #laborday, #mondaymotivation.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #laborday, #mondaymotivation.
Compared with accounts its own size
Romantica's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.029%, Romantica sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 59% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 331 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 7, 20261.9x their median
India is one of a kind. The largest democracy with more than 5000 years old history. Billions of people with hundreds of regional languages and cultures. These 5 books will help you get the idea of India. 1. The Golden Road by William Dalrymple → India’s ancient global influence 2. The Discovery of India by Jawaharlal Nehru → India’s civilizational story 3. Annihilation of Caste by B. R. Ambedkar → caste and social structure 4. The Idea of India by Sunil Khilnani → modern Indian identity 5. India After Gandhi by Ramachandra Guha → post-1947 India
- Sep 9, 2026
Only creative act is human. If you feel stuck at your creative endeavours, these books will help. 1. War of art + Turning pro by @SPressfield 2. Improv wisdom by @patryanmadson 3. The practice by @ThisIsSethsBlog 4. Big magic by Elizabeth Gilbert 5. The creative act by @RickRubin Read in the same order. I have read all of them and guarantee that it will help you. Share with your creative friend.
- Sep 6, 2026
How far you can go for an inspiration? Edith Sitwell (1887-1964), poetess of the famous collection "Façade", would briefly lie inside an open coffin to reflect on mortality and tap into her creative subconscious to draw inspiration for her macabre work. https://t.co/OfKPOt1m4p
- Sep 5, 2026
Clouded thoughts? - Four books for clear thinking. 1. Thinking, fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman 2. The scout mindset by Julia galef 3. Clear thinking by Shane parrish 4. Super thinking by Gabriel weinberg & Lauren McCann
- Aug 22, 2026
Most people read books to finish them. Richard Feynman had a better way to learn from books. Here’s his 4 step technique. 1. Read/learn the concept Read a chapter, article, or section normally, but don’t try to memorize every sentence. 2. Close the book and explain it Without looking back, explain the idea in your own words, as if you were teaching it to a 12-year-old. For example, instead of remembering: “Compound interest is the addition of interest to the principal…” Say: “Compound interest means your money earns interest, and then that interest also starts earning interest.” 3. Find the gaps Whenever you get stuck, use complicated words, or realize you can’t explain something clearly, you’ve found a knowledge gap. Go back to the book only to fill that gap. 4. Simplify and create an analogy Explain it again using simple language, examples, or analogies. Then stop. For reading books faster You can turn it into this 10-minute reading loop: Read → Close book → Recall → Explain → Check → Simplify For every 5–10 pages, ask yourself: * What was the main idea? * What are the 3 most important things I learned? * Can I explain this without looking? * How does this connect to something I already know? * Where would I actually use this? The important part is closing the book and retrieving the information. Simply rereading and highlighting creates familiarity, but active recall forces your brain to actually retrieve the knowledge. A powerful combination is: Feynman Technique + active recall + spaced repetition. That will generally give you much better long-term retention than simply reading a book repeatedly.
- Aug 22, 2026
“Books are the perfect entertainment: no commercials, no batteries, hours of enjoyment for each dollar spent. What I wonder is why everybody doesn't carry a book around for those inevitable dead spots in life.” ― Stephen King
- Sep 8, 2026
The paragraph below by Oscar Wilde in “The Canterville Ghost” shows poetic writing. Words flow like music. You can compare how literary writing has changed over the years & now with AI it’s getting worse. Thank God, we still have classics to save us from monotonous writing https://t.co/Sysm9eolPR
- Aug 23, 2026
You don’t need to start with Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, or philosophy. Start with whatever gets you reading. An easy novel can rebuild your attention span, improve your vocabulary, and make reading feel natural again. Then gradually increase the difficulty. Think of your brain like a muscle: Easy books → harder books → complex ideas. You don’t build strength by lifting the heaviest weight on day one. You build it by starting and consistently adding more weight. So yes, read the popular novel. Just don’t let it be the hardest thing you ever read.
- Aug 21, 2026
Feeling stressed, overwhelmed, or mentally drained? 12 free kindle unlimited books worth checking out: 1. The Power of Positive Living 2. Recovering from Emotionally Immature Parents 3. When Your Daughter Has BPD 4. Communicate Your Feelings 5. Dare 6. The Art of Letting Go 7. Women Who Think Too Much 8. Decluttering at the Speed of Life 9. Essential Art Therapy Exercises 10. Unfck Your Brain 11. Mind Over Back Pain 12. Anchored Save this list for your next stressful day. 📖
- Sep 9, 2026
Happy Birthday “Leo Tolstoy” https://t.co/1lSc813SPN
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 68K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 1.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #laborday, #mondaymotivation.
- What is Romantica's engagement rate on X?
- Romantica (@readromantica) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 67,666 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.029%, Romantica sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @readromantica have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @readromantica post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.