Back to @raven42g's profile

raven42g engagement report

@raven42g - 133K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
3.12%
of 133K followers
Per impression
8.03%
51K views on a typical post
Reach
38.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
2.14%
1.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 4.1K interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 3.12%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 8.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

raven42g's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 3.12%, raven42g sits above the 90th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.32% to 83.4%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 189 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 20262.8x their median

    Does ur πŸ† got up when u see me teasing u like this ? 🀫 Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/arD6lJjSR9

    10K1.0K848155K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.4x their median

    Babe, dont let them see this 🀫 she will be jealous 😈 Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/SRUKFRoq9j

    9.0K782383129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.4x their median

    I love my new bush πŸ’ž they looked so messy but somehow theyre messy now? πŸ˜‹ Btw my mommymilkers has to compete with my bush to make u guys getting OBSESSED ‼️ Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/d1AhFuvWdY

    8.8K893826156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.1x their median

    My veins is about to POP 😍 b🍩🍩by positivity is on the way πŸˆπŸˆπŸ’¦πŸ”₯πŸ’• Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/aO4VDcwxxo

    8.0K66156392K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.1x their median

    All the small detail that doesn't show under a "beautiful lighting".. sometimes it needs a trick to show em beautiful cellulite on my mommymilkers without any filters which ofc, i appreciate the feature that i have on my body 🫢🏻 body positivity at its peak πŸ’– Main https://t.co/zAylEQQonU Secondary https://t.co/yITEYuxSfL

    7.8K68477385K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.1x their median

    Wrked hard on my glutes, u can see i hv tons of progress, not just my glutes but my back also πŸ’• now im loving my body more and more πŸ‘‘ and ofc, i would love to have my king to come pick me up and make me his only πŸ’• Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/nwqeahMo7J

    7.8K592545138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.9x their median

    Weather report! Its 41Β°C today and i hv to drop my hanger on top of a table and get some air while resting em baddies πŸͺ­πŸ’¨ other than that, did u get hot too while im relieving myself? 😈 Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/7BW7AuWhnP

    7.1K59539262K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20261.9x their median

    Wish im sitting on top of u while i put my hangers on top of ur face πŸ˜‹πŸˆπŸˆ Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/Xvcl9hgr2D

    6.9K66160367K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.9x their median

    Come laying down right infront of me, maybe the next time u open ur eyes im actually there with u ? 🫢🏻 I will definitely smother u with my mommymilkers 😘 Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/LZFvyfiG1S

    6.8K67340388K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.8x their median

    I let em hang and auto clap every single time i looked down 😘 Main https://t.co/k95xueF0MI Secondary https://t.co/LqJNPmFdpC https://t.co/dncUsob7Xm

    6.6K68926778K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.1K interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 3.12%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 8.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post.

What is raven42g's engagement rate on X?
raven42g (@raven42g) has an engagement rate of 3.12%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 133,021 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 3.12%, raven42g sits above the 90th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @raven42g have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @raven42g post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going