Back to @rasbt's profile

Sebastian Raschka engagement report

@rasbt - 498K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.276%
of 498K followers
Per impression
2.09%
66K views on a typical post
Reach
13.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.771%
506 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 498K followers, an engagement rate of 0.276%. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 2.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.9K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #acmtechtalk.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.276%, Sebastian Raschka sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 30, 20265.0x their median

    After 18 months of writing, coding, and experimenting, Build a Reasoning Model (From Scratch) is finally out! My first copies just arrived! 📚 440 full-color pages. Inference scaling, reinforcement learning, and distillation from scratch. https://t.co/647ksI7sLc

    6.0K55928153533K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20264.1x their median

    For agentic coding, one can say: - Unless you need Terra Ultra perf, it's always better to use a Luna model with higher effort setting (same or better performance but cheaper). - Forget everything below Sol High, use Luna with higher effort settings here - Forget Sol Extra High, use Terra Ultra here - The extra cost of Sol Ultra is probably not worth it over Max

    4.7K458329193973K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20263.9x their median

    How can an LLM switch between low-, medium-, and high-effort reasoning? And how does an LLM learn to reason more or less? I put together a “little” article explaining how these effort levels are implemented at inference time and during training. https://t.co/mc4qiCnq0C

    4.5K68010847323K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.5x their median

    The Kimi K3 architecture figure for yesterday's big open-weight model release, along with some observations and thoughts. 1. Yes, it looks relatively complicated, but it's essentially a scaled-up production version of their Kimi Linear model they released last year (scaled up from 48B -> 2.8T; K3 is by far the biggest open-weight model right now) 2. The one new component compared to Kimi Linear is the LatentMoE. I omitted it in the figure below since it's already very crowded, but that's essentially the same LatentMoE as in Nemotron 3 Ultra (you can find it in my LLM Architecture Gallery if you are curious). The idea here is to compress (down-project) large linear layers similar to multi-head latent attention. 3. Kimi K3's overall trend (similar to Nemotron 3, DeepSeek V4, and others) is also towards better inference efficiency. That is, there are many components that replace existing components with efficiency-tweaked versions. I.e., MoE -> LatentMoE, regular attention -> multi-head latent attention and Kimi Delta Attention. (I also have short tutorials and write-ups in my gallery if you are curious about additional details). 4. The one component change that is not an efficiency tweak is attention residuals. Like DeepSeek V4 improved the residual path with mHC (manifold-constrained Hyper-Connections), attention residuals are a way to improve the residual path, but it works a bit differently. I.e., mHC made the residual path wider. Attention residuals (also already part of Kimi Linear) connect the residuals across layers; the connection itself uses an attention score for an important/contribution weight. According to the report, it improves the validation loss and downstream performance (a bit) consistently and adds about 4% in training cost and 2% in inference cost. 5. Interestingly, Kimi K3 got rid of all RoPE layers and uses NoPE (No Positional Embeddings) everywhere instead. (Again, this is inherited from Kimi Linear). In other architectures, the recent trend was towards RoPE in local attention layers (like sliding window attention) and NoPE in the global layers. There were a few architectures that only used NoPE everywhere, but this is the first frontier-level one as far as I know. 6. Kimi K3 now also has native multimodal support, which is great! There are several other interesting training tidbits in the technical report, but that's it from the architecture front so far. A really great release overall.

    4.1K62010530237K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.4x their median

    Just saw that the LLMs-from-scratch repository passed 100,000 stars on GitHub! This is super cool and motivating. I am really happy to see that this open-source repo has helped so many people. Thanks also to everyone who shared ideas and opened PRs with improvements! Of course, I plan to keep adding new material, including new attention variants and architectures (while bigger projects like RL and Reasoning From Scratch live in their separate repositories). I am also currently working on a larger applied custom “small” LLM project. It has been keeping me super busy this month, but I will share more on that soon. If you are new to it, some of the highlights include 1. Of course, the complete code path from tokenization and attention to pretraining, classification, and instruction fine-tuning, etc. All of it FROM SCRATCH, of course! (RL lives in a companion repo.) 2. From-scratch implementations of Llama, Qwen, Gemma, and Olmo (smaller variants that run locally and can be plugged into the training scripts). 3. From-scratch implementations of attention alternatives and other architecture components, such as GQA, MLA, sliding-window attention, Gated DeltaNet, DeepSeek Sparse Attention, cross-layer KV sharing, and mixture-of-experts 4. Materials on KV caching, training performance, memory-efficient weight loading, DPO, evaluation, and LoRA So, if you don’t have any weekend plans yet, happy tinkering!

    4.0K5598126170K viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 20262.6x their median

    April was a pretty strong month for LLM releases: - Gemma 4 - GLM-5.1 - Qwen3.6 - Kimi K2.6 - DeepSeek V4 All are now added to the LLM Architecture Gallery. More details once I am fully back in May! https://t.co/HDYbWi2pcc

    3.0K4347625128K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20262.5x their median

    Yes, LLM architectures are getting a little more complicated https://t.co/jII112pJbO

    3.2K1559122175K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.5x their median

    We ran Kimi K3 through 3 agent harnesses (Claude Code, Hermes, Kimi Code) on 28 identical tasks. All 3 harnesses completed the tasks at similar success rates, but the interesting story is token efficiency: the same task cost up to 30x more tokens depending on the harness. 🧵🧵

    2.9K177219103687K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20262.4x their median

    WHAT THE HELL is happening in AI? A 3B parameter model just put up coding benchmark scores in the same league as Claude Opus 4.5. 3 BILLION. The weights are on Hugging Face, anyone can test it. I genuinely don't know if this is a breakthrough or if the benchmarks are broken. https://t.co/8nVIbwjLUQ

    2.8K18220884680K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20262.3x their median

    Introducing: Cohere Command A+ We’ve created our most powerful LLM yet, optimized it to run on as little hardware as possible, and released it open-source for all. https://t.co/C1KYnvA8JB

    2.6K367103113743K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#acmtechtalk

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 498K followers, an engagement rate of 0.276%. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 2.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.9K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Sebastian Raschka's engagement rate on X?
Sebastian Raschka (@rasbt) has an engagement rate of 0.276%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 498,474 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.276%, Sebastian Raschka sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rasbt have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @rasbt post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going