PlayerSells
Back to @raphaelvarane's profile

Raphaël Varane engagement report

@raphaelvarane - 6.9M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 6.9M followers
Per impression
0.067%
1.2M views on a typical post
Reach
17.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
788
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
58 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 788 interactions against 6.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 2 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.2M times each, and 0.067% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 362K interactions, about 459x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Raphaël Varane's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Raphaël Varane sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.006% to 0.046%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link50% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length-+12%+10% to +15%6.3K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 393 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 12% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 2024459x their median

    Thank you, football. 🤍 https://t.co/zTC5ebqclB

    308K44K5.1K5.0K7.9M viewsView on X
  • Feb 26, 2023394x their median

    A few of these together now @Casemiro hermano !! 🏆😁 https://t.co/g84HETSvKd

    286K21K1.6K1.5K9.4M viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 2025202x their median

    Cheers to last night 🤩 @ManUtd https://t.co/PnT44F5lNS

    146K11K1.4K8905.0M viewsView on X
  • May 14, 2024201x their median

    Thank you for everything, @ManUtd ❤️ https://t.co/4nwJxk4ddf

    121K22K6.1K9.4K11M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2023194x their median

    We had a meeting last week with the FA. They recommended from the referees new decisions and rules. From the managers and players, we have shared our concerns for many years now that there are too many games, the schedule is overcrowded, and it’s at a dangerous level for players physical and mental well-being. Despite our previous feedbacks, they have now recommended for next season: longer games, more intensity, and less emotions to be shown by players. We just want to be in good condition on the pitch to give 100% to our club and fans. Why are our opinions not being heard? As a player I feel very privileged to do the job I love every day but I feel these changes are damaging our game. We want to be at our maximum level, the best we can be and put on amazing performances for fans to celebrate every week. I believe it is important that we, players and managers, highlight these important issues as we want to protect the game we love and give the fans our best.

    126K19K3.8K4.4K23M viewsView on X
  • Jan 14, 2023187x their median

    MANCHESTER IS REDDDDD !! ⚔️🔴 https://t.co/N4oisYvBed

    134K12K9114443.6M viewsView on X
  • Feb 2, 2023155x their median

    Merci pour tout 💙🤍♥️ https://t.co/FUk4zZWFpt

    107K12K1.4K1.9K9.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2023149x their median

    COME ONNN !!!! ⚔️❤️ https://t.co/4h049mgPhS

    108K8.3K1.2K3742.0M viewsView on X
  • May 21, 2025121x their median

    Come on @ManUtd !!! 🔴🔴 https://t.co/hCDLbvTvYs

    84K8.8K1.2K1.0K4.6M viewsView on X
  • Dec 31, 2022115x their median

    Five wins in a row a strong way to end the year ⚔️ Happy new year everyone !! https://t.co/XOArXrXgHN

    84K5.5K6032002.8M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 788 interactions against 6.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 2 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.2M times each, and 0.067% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 362K interactions, about 459x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Raphaël Varane's engagement rate on X?
Raphaël Varane (@raphaelvarane) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 6,886,731 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Raphaël Varane sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @raphaelvarane have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @raphaelvarane post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going