Ramon Cotarelo engagement report
@ramoncotarelo - 193K followers on X
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 774 times each, and 0.775% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 3525x its own typical post.
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ramon Cotarelo's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Ramon Cotarelo sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 3% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 88% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 88% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 159 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 9, 20263525x their median
What the West Still Doesn’t Get It: Communism’s True Core: The Systemic Lie Most people in the West think they understand communism. They picture bread lines, gulags, failed five-year plans, and the collapsed Soviet Union. They treat it as a discredited economic theory – an experiment that proved that abolishing private property doesn’t work. Case closed, history moved on. This misunderstanding may be the most dangerous intellectual failure of our time. Communism was never primarily an economic system. Economics was the surface. Beneath it lay something far more insidious: a total, systemic, institutionalized commitment to lying. Not occasional dishonesty. Not spin or propaganda in the ordinary sense. Something deeper – a civilizational war against truth itself, waged through every institution, every classroom, every newspaper, every conversation, until reality itself became negotiable and the lie became the air people breathed. The Words We’re Missing The Polish language, forged by decades of living under this system, produced words for this phenomenon that English simply cannot match: Zakłamanie [zah-kwah-MAH-nyeh] – a state of total, pervasive, socially embedded falsehood, a condition in which an entire society is saturated with lies so thoroughly that truth becomes almost inaccessible. Obłuda [ob-woo-dah] – a deep, performative hypocrisy, the gap between what is proclaimed and what is actually practiced, the mask worn so long it begins to feel like a face. These are not words for individual liars. They describe a system – a mode of social organization built on organized mendacity, where the lie is not the exception but the foundation. English has no single word for either concept, and that linguistic gap is not a coincidence. It reflects a gap in experience. Cultures that did not live under communism lack the vocabulary because they lack the wound. And because they lack the vocabulary, they struggle to recognize the thing when it reappears in new clothing. The Continuity: Communism, Leftism, Wokeism What we call wokeism today, or the broader radical left, is not a new phenomenon. It is the same operating system running on updated hardware. The specifics have changed – instead of the proletariat, we have marginalized identity groups; instead of bourgeois class enemies, we have racists and transphobes; instead of socialist realism, we have DEI statements. But the deep structure is the same. That deep structure is this: truth is not discovered, it is assigned. Reality is not something to be understood honestly but something to be narrated strategically. Language is not a tool for communication but a weapon of power. And anyone who resists the approved narrative is not simply wrong – they are dangerous, and must be silenced, shamed, or destroyed. This is zakłamanie in its modern form. This is obłuda wearing a human rights badge. The same movement that insists men can become women will insist, with equal fervor, that questioning this is an act of violence. The same institutions that claim to champion free inquiry systematically suppress dissent. The same people who invoke tolerance as their highest value are among the most intolerant forces in public life. The contradiction is not accidental – it is structural. It is the system working as designed. Why the West Still Doesn’t Get It People who grew up in freedom tend to assume, at some level, that bad actors know they are lying. That somewhere behind the ideological performance, there is a cynical operator who privately acknowledges reality. This assumption is wrong, and it is why Westerners consistently underestimate what they are dealing with. The totalitarian lie, at its mature stage, is not cynical. It is believed. Or rather, it creates a condition in which the distinction between belief and performance collapses entirely. People learn to say things they do not believe so fluently, and for so long, that they lose access to what they actually think. 1/2
- Sep 14, 2026591x their median
Segons sembla, els tertulians de la ràdio estan malparlant de mi per la glossa de Ripoll. Cap hi va ser. Parlen del que s'han inventat uns periodistes que tampoc hi van ser. Ningú m'ha trucat per contrastar. Uns mitjans corruptes d'un país corrupte.
- Oct 9, 2026260x their median
Aquests, per la cadira, maten. https://t.co/LrAsNMsL5l
- Sep 14, 2026159x their median
Dues qüestions per als que diuen que la glossa de Ripoll no va ser adient. 1a Sí que ho va ser. Del cap a la fi. La Diada va de la desfeta de Catalunya i la seva restitució contra els seus enemics. O no? 2a Considereu adient rebre els Goyas al grit de Free Palestine? Per què?
- Oct 10, 202674x their median
AC és l'única força del Parlament que defensa la llibertat i la independència de Catalunya i les de les dones.
- Sep 15, 202655x their median
Professor @ramoncotarelo: Hi ha catalans de soca-rel, de bressol, catalans per adopció, de pas, i repartits pel món. Vostè encarna una catalanor amb la qual em sento plenament identificat: la del català per amor a Catalunya, la del que se sent català pel fet de viure i estimar en català. Si, vam venir al món en un altre lloc –els catalans naixem on volem– potser llunyà, però ara som aquí, aquí està el nostre cor i la nostra vida. No defalleixi, mestre, encara que li recordin una vegada i una altra que nasqué fora. Quin rebombori tot plegat, el que ha generat la seva glossa a Ripoll! Enhorabona. Que els intel·lectuals i els artistes incomodin, és una necessitat per a la salut democràtica d'un país. Quan estàvem preparant el llibre de relats "Volem recollir", de @psiborn, i li vam proposar un pròleg sobre la llibertat d'expressió, no va dubtar ni un moment i ens va regalar una peça reconfortant i valenta. El llibre era una resposta a la demanda que l'@OriolSoler i @AbacusCoop al voltant del cas #7, "La marca de Caín" (el llibre que no volen que llegiu). Avui porto aquí aquest petit tastet d'aquelles pàgines per fer-li costat, i per reivindicar amb vostè, el dret a la llibertat d'expressió. Visca Catalunya Lliure... de no callar davant els que tenen por de dir i sentir amb llibertat. Lliure d'aquests manaires acomplexats que fan que tanta gent no segui on vol. "No s'han d'oblidar els altres, molt nombrosos, en aquesta conxorxa. Els que actuen com a periodistes, però militen en partits polítics i exerceixen la seva funció sense avisar l'audiència, mentre esperen que el seu partit els recompensi amb alguna posició ben remunerada a l'administració pública o semipública. Aquest falsejament arriba a cotes més grans quan no es tracta només de periodistes aïllats, sinó de mitjans com empreses que entren en relació amb els poders públics. Molts països tenen normes que permeten als governs subvencionar els mitjans de comunicació privats. A primera vista no s'entén per quin motiu se subvencionen aquests i no altres negocis o empreses, com ara les de queviures o les de reparació d'automòbils, per exemple. La justificació fa valer el caràcter especial del producte amb què negocien, un bé intangible d’alt valor, la informació, que té un gran impacte sobre l’opinió pública. No és una raó gaire convincent, però el fet que també se subvencionen altres activitats d'aquest mateix gènere “ideològic”, com les esglésies, les fundacions, les organitzacions caritatives, les ONG, etc., aplana el camí cap a les subvencions dels mitjans. En realitat, totes aquestes subvencions no hi haurien de ser." I adjunto aquesta imatge de quan escrivia a El Món: per recordar que també el van fer fora d'allà, contra la seva llibertat d'expressió.
- Sep 15, 20265.0x their median
PALINUR: Per què no cau Sánchez (a) “el marroquí”? https://t.co/gMcU7yO5GN
- Oct 10, 20264.7x their median
PALINUR: Un govern antisemita. https://t.co/hWLTONk6iF
- Sep 15, 20263.2x their median
PALINUR: L'auca de la corrupció catalana https://t.co/UIu0Bt3vhZ
- Oct 10, 20262.8x their median
PALINUR: La casta vol fer la revolució. https://t.co/nE0zftz2Sm
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 774 times each, and 0.775% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 3525x its own typical post.
- What is Ramon Cotarelo's engagement rate on X?
- Ramon Cotarelo (@ramoncotarelo) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 193,302 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Ramon Cotarelo sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ramoncotarelo have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ramoncotarelo post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.9 posts per day across the measured window.