Back to @ramit's profile

Ramit Sethi engagement report

@ramit - 303K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.036%
of 303K followers
Per impression
0.415%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
8.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
109
interactions (median)
Saved
0.099%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.8/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 109 interactions against 303K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.415% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video, 48% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 183K interactions, about 1682x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ramit Sethi's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.036%, Ramit Sethi sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video48% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 374 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 20261682x their median

    i think about this often i think it is very true more people need to think like this https://t.co/kVS1L5EaWD

    173K9.2K4258003.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026458x their median

    One of the stranger parts of being an adult is realizing how many people have never questioned a single belief they inherited. Not even out of curiosity.

    40K9.7K204312446K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202675x their median

    My Son just spent 30 days up north working his ass off. Overtime on top of his regular hours. He made 10,000 dollars. This Morning he woke up to find out the Government took 4,000 of his pay check. He’s 29. Tying to build a life,marry his gf of 6 years. He just stormed into my Holiday Trailer ranting about how much he fucking hates Canada. Hates the Government. Mark Carney you fucking cunt. I hate you. I hate your Government,you are a giant pos. I hope you get an incurable disease and suffer the worst fate known to man before your useless,corrupted ass dies. I curse you and your whole bloodline for generations to come. May they know nothing but suffering for their whole lives. FUCK CARNEY FUCK THE LIBERALS FUCK CANADUH.

    5.6K7401.7K1763.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202663x their median

    At what income level does flying first class become a reasonable expense rather than a complete waste of money?

    6.4K34343531.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202636x their median

    Yes, if you inherited a $200,000 house but you cannot feed your kids, I expect you to sell your house Easiest question I've ever gotten https://t.co/2meSJnXJym

    3.8K4510214268K viewsView on X
  • Feb 12, 202534x their median

    10 things Republicans have done in the last 1 month 1. Republicans ended the Direct File program, which allowed you to easily file your taxes online, for free. 2. JD Vance blamed "DEI policies" for a deadly crash between an airliner and military helicopter.

    3.4K3737026459K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202626x their median

    If I told you what Republicans were actually doing right now, you wouldn't believe me — you would think I was lying, that it's actually too cruel and corrupt to be true But it's true 10 things Republicans have done in the last 10 days 🧵 https://t.co/BMapjaQLj8

    2.1K6743351338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202625x their median

    Lauren, 39, retired early as part of the FIRE community. Some fascinating insights from her interview with The Cut https://t.co/s7OPvnuSy0

    2.5K765424386K viewsView on X
  • Nov 5, 202512x their median

    Rich people actually don't move when taxes go up You were just fed that propaganda by the ultra wealthy and you actually believed it https://t.co/Cl9XWn2heS

    2.0K29117729549K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202619x their median

    Let's take a look at some of the Texas voters that the @nytimes just interviewed This voter calls himself "down the middle" and "independent" and then, in the next sentence, admits he votes Republican "most of the time" [all of the time] https://t.co/qcuSdelwxV

    1.9K783016119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 109 interactions against 303K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.415% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video, 48% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 183K interactions, about 1682x its own typical post.

What is Ramit Sethi's engagement rate on X?
Ramit Sethi (@ramit) has an engagement rate of 0.036%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 303,482 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.036%, Ramit Sethi sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ramit have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ramit post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going