Back to @rambunctiousgus's profile

Gus engagement report

@rambunctiousgus - 542K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 542K followers
Per impression
0.105%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
2.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 542K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.105% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 509x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gus's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Gus sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 86 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 13, 2026509x their median

    Black Panther & Storm https://t.co/LeJhbssbVT

    7.1K1.0K2729386K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026103x their median

    Coming to a pool in Palm Springs near you 😉 https://t.co/XdlSlyloML

    1.5K14213128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202685x their median

    https://t.co/mued1vp7LY

    1.2K10713026K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202667x their median

    Los Angeles, are you ready? 🎻 The Marvel Rivals Galactic Concert brings the ultimate cosmic soundscape to the West Coast! Grab your tickets before they sell out and experience your favorite heroes' themes performed live. Secure your LA tickets here: https://t.co/96qKF32zlE https://t.co/9Bz5xzkHNY

    99751292128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202652x their median

    Come join 🤌 https://t.co/TlgHnkUdn9

    7734110126K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202648x their median

    O local que Lana Del Rey vai cantar em Singapura tem capacidade para 65 mil pessoas Esse será um dos maiores shows da carreira da cantora https://t.co/YspXkbHia4

    6965414825K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20267.4x their median

    https://t.co/FxHdHCRjHT

    11341012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20265.3x their median

    I’m just a bird https://t.co/beD3R1W8ha

    8122016K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20265.0x their median

    Wish I had someone sucking my dick right about now

    7036120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.4x their median

    I hate being stared at in public lol Just talk to me 😭 Why make it so awkward

    3323018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 542K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.105% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 509x its own typical post.

What is Gus's engagement rate on X?
Gus (@rambunctiousgus) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 542,407 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Gus sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rambunctiousgus have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rambunctiousgus post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going