Back to @rajgokal's profile

raj đź–¤ engagement report

@rajgokal - 2.4M followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.019%
of 2.4M followers
Per impression
0.6%
76K views on a typical post
Reach
3.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
454
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 454 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 76K times each, and 0.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 95K interactions, about 285x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, raj đź–¤ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 328 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 9, 2026285x their median

    Wake up babe there’s a Portuguese Catholic priest who mixes Gregorian chants with industrial techno house music https://t.co/ClW8d7PJTG

    81K10K1.4K1.8K4.8M viewsView on X
  • Dec 30, 202589x their median

    Anthony Hopkins, 87, celebrates 50 years of sobriety. “50 years ago today I was nearly killed. I drove my car in a drunken blackout- that’s the way it was but I realized at that point I was having too much fun. It was called alcoholism.” https://t.co/FMOdIdpPki

    31K1.8K2691282.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202668x their median

    NEW: RFK Jr. says Medicare spending on wound care patches exploded from $200 million in 2019 to $14 billion last year: "It's all stolen." Bad actors billed Medicare billions by slapping the most expensive skin grafts on elderly and dying patients who didn't need them. "The doctors who prescribed them would get 6% of the sales cost. And so, they were incentivized to prescribe more expensive products. In Europe, they spend 35 cents a cubic inch. We were spending $135, and that went up to $2,000 a cubic inch." "So 2019, we were paying $200 million. Last year we spent 14 billion. All stolen. It's all stolen. And we were on track to spend 23 billion this year." "We put an end to it, and we now have driven that cost down to somewhere around a billion dollars." In one Arizona case, the owners of two wound care companies pleaded guilty to more than $1.2 billion in fraudulent claims. Medicare paid over $1 million per patient for grafts slapped on elderly patients who didn't need them, many of them dying in hospice. In June, DOJ charged 11 more defendants over more than $2 billion in allograft claims, including a company accused of issuing sham invoices to inflate what Medicare paid. It feels like every week I learn a new way people were ripping off taxpayers for billions.

    23K6.8K6203571.0M viewsView on X
  • Jan 12, 202665x their median

    i get my news from PsyopAnime "I know you're tired, but come, this is the way." https://t.co/PuXQG00FYr

    24K4.7K9518173.0M viewsView on X
  • Jan 11, 202647x their median

    X is the best source for financial news -- and hundreds of billions of dollars are deployed based on things people read here. We are building Smart Cashtags that allow you to specify the exact asset (or smart contract) when posting a ticker. From Timeline, users will be able to tap them to see its real-time price along with all mentions of that asset. We're aiming to collect feedback as we iterate toward a public release next month.

    15K1.5K3.7K1.8K5.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202648x their median

    ONE YEAR AGO, Captain Smit Machchhar was asked what's a bigger high: A smooth landing, or an on-time arrival? His answer: "None. Safe. You don't have to think about on time. They've hired other people to take care of that." "A positive landing. Safe landing where I'm supposed to land. If it turns out smooth, perfect." Today, stabbed by his co-pilot, he still got the cockpit door open so passengers could stop the hijacking. He saved the lives of all 174 passengers, and they had a safe landing. Thank you, Captain Machchhar.

    20K1.9K1111032.8M viewsView on X
  • Feb 17, 202651x their median

    I built the first AI that earns its existence, self-improves, and replicates without a human wrote about the technology that finally gives AI write access to the world, The Automaton, and the new web for exponential sovereign AIs WEB 4.0: The birth of superintelligent life https://t.co/R28AKJsSfy

    14K1.9K1.5K1.7K6.5M viewsView on X
  • Jan 11, 202634x their median

    BREAKING: @X to launch Smart Cashtags, allowing users to post Solana tokens and view charts and news 🤯 https://t.co/ercqydx61k

    6.6K1.1K1.2K5681.2M viewsView on X
  • Jan 5, 202617x their median

    🚨🇺🇸 NYC MAYOR MAMDANI'S HOUSING OFFICIAL: "YOUR HOME SHOULDN’T REALLY BE YOURS" According to Cea Weaver, a top housing advisor for NYC Mayor Mamdani, the idea of owning your home the way people always have is outdated. She says we’ve treated property as something personal for “centuries,” and now it’s time to see it as “collective.” Her words? Families (especially white ones, of course) need a “different relationship to property.” In other words: stop thinking of your house as yours, and start thinking of it as something shared. This isn’t a fringe activist on TikTok. This is a person in charge of housing policy for New York City. Heads up: this "shared equity" talk is a nice way of saying ownership might not mean what you think it does anymore. Source: @EndWokeness

    4.7K1.6K1.4K4381.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202617x their median

    Zuck: “introducing Muse, your personal superintelligence in a secure. private, personal VM.” Alexander Wang: “So I’ve been watching what people do with their muses and here are some examples.”

    7.4K19011638918K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 454 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 76K times each, and 0.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 95K interactions, about 285x its own typical post.

What is raj đź–¤'s engagement rate on X?
raj đź–¤ (@rajgokal) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,416,061 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, raj đź–¤ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rajgokal have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @rajgokal post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going