Back to @rafa_cavada's profile

Rafael Cavada engagement report

@rafa_cavada - 340K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.017%
of 340K followers
Per impression
0.463%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
56
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 340K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.463% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #turnoenvivo, #remembertomorrow, #saludos. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #turnoenvivo, #remembertomorrow, #saludos.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Rafael Cavada sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link57% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 57% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 690 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 202637x their median

    CARTA ABIERTA A LA SENADORA CAMILA FLORES. @Cami_FloresO Senadora Flores: Hay frases que retratan mejor a quien las pronuncia que a quien pretenden ofender. La suya, dirigida a la senadora Fabiola Campillai —“se le salió lo poblacional a la señora de feria”— pertenece a esa categoría. Usted quiso lanzar un dardo clasista y terminó escribiendo, en apenas diez palabras, una autobiografía del arribismo. Porque, senadora, ser “señora de feria” no constituye insulto alguno. Insulto sería suponer que trabajar desde las cinco de la mañana, levantar un puesto, cargar cajones, soportar frío, calor y lluvia, pagar cuentas y educar hijos con el esfuerzo cotidiano convierte a alguien en ciudadano de segunda categoría. Chile tiene 1.455 ferias libres, 163.165 puestos y una actividad capaz de generar alrededor de 440.000 empleos. Más de la mitad de quienes trabajan allí son mujeres. Mujeres, senadora. Esas mismas a las que usted convirtió retóricamente en material de desprecio para intentar humillar a otra mujer. Curiosa manera de representar al pueblo. También utilizó “poblacional” como si vivir en una población fuese una patología social, una especie de desperfecto de origen. Quizás convendría recordarle que las poblaciones no son zoológicos donde habita una especie distinta a la suya. Allí viven trabajadores, técnicos, comerciantes, profesores, jubilados, estudiantes, feriantes, emprendedores y probablemente miles de personas que alguna vez votaron por usted. Ese es precisamente el aspecto más miserable de su frase: no ofende solamente a Campillai. Pretende degradar a millones de chilenos cuya vida transcurre lejos de los salones donde algunos políticos, después de conseguir un escaño, comienzan misteriosamente a olvidar de dónde viene el voto que los sentó allí. Porque existe una forma particularmente pintoresca de arribismo político: subir unos cuantos escalones institucionales y comenzar inmediatamente a patear la escalera que les puso ahí. Y resulta todavía más sorprendente cuando quien utiliza el origen social como arma arrojadiza no nació precisamente entre la realeza, jardines versallescos y cubiertos de plata. Usted conoce perfectamente el Chile de población. Por eso su expresión no puede atribuirse al desconocimiento. Es peor: revela distancia adquirida. Esa curiosa enfermedad de algunos políticos que, apenas reciben tratamiento de “honorable”, comienzan a imaginar que el título viene acompañado de abolengo. El episodio adquiere además una ironía difícil de ignorar. Mientras usted emplea “señora de feria” para menospreciar a otra senadora, el Ministerio Público mantiene abierta una investigación en su contra por el denominado caso “Cuota Flores”, originada en denuncias sobre presuntas entregas de parte de las remuneraciones de colaboradores. La responsabilidad penal deberá determinarla la justicia, naturalmente. Pero la paradoja política es monumental: resulta bastante audaz mirar hacia abajo a quienes se ganan honradamente cada peso mientras una investigación judicial examina precisamente qué ocurrió con dineros vinculados al trabajo de sus propios asesores. Tal vez convendría entonces revisar qué significa realmente la palabra dignidad. Dignidad tiene la mujer que vende verduras bajo la lluvia. Dignidad tiene quien abre su puesto cuando usted probablemente todavía duerme. Dignidad tiene la familia que vive en una población y paga durante veinte o treinta años su casa. Dignidad tiene quien trabaja sin apellido ilustre, sin dieta parlamentaria, sin asesores y sin fuero. Una feria libre no rebaja a nadie. Una población tampoco. Lo que sí rebaja, y mucho, es creer que ambas cosas pueden utilizarse como insulto. Porque el problema, senadora Flores, nunca fue que a alguien “se le saliera lo poblacional”. El problema es que a usted se le salió lo clasista, lo arribista, lo trepadora y oportunista. Y eso, a diferencia de trabajar en una feria o vivir en una población, sí debería darle vergüenza. @MisColumnas

    1.2K7341114483K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20249.5x their median

    Siempre es un buen día para escuchar este tema. https://t.co/PgvrFvFtvf

    252452304253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.0x their median

    Andrea Repetto. Patrimonio estadístico https://t.co/3KJoJl8ZHm

    10758038.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Ejecutivo estudia opción de llamar a plebiscito si el Congreso rechaza la reforma de seguridad https://t.co/X2DYYflXxh

    1212132320K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Mira este artículo: https://t.co/asQ1aaxMPS

    39143012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Los detalles de la prisión preventiva para Clark y exdirectores de Sarto... https://t.co/SfzGCeCVgm a través de @YouTube

    12413013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Tras el premiado «Tears of the Dragon» de @BruceDMaiden, llega su complemento. «Change of Heart» se filmó en São Paulo, Brasil, en septiembre de 2025, Bruce y los directores Leo Liberti y Antoine de Montremy, crearon un hermoso y emotivo cortometraje https://t.co/OBnuEv3oJr

    00011.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    @OfficialOpeth #RememberTomorrow Written by Steve Harris and Paul Di'anno.(@IronMaiden) It was originally included on the "A call To Irons" My Arms, Your Hearse, 29 años hoy 18 de Agosto 1997 https://t.co/PTJXBhFtZ1

    0001896 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#turnoenvivo#remembertomorrow#saludos#uptheirons

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 340K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.463% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #turnoenvivo, #remembertomorrow, #saludos. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Rafael Cavada's engagement rate on X?
Rafael Cavada (@rafa_cavada) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 339,510 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Rafael Cavada sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rafa_cavada have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @rafa_cavada post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going