Radar engagement report
@radaronline - 417K followers on X
Measured over 77 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 417K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 77 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0.808% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.653% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 77 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 52x its own typical post.
Measured over 77 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Radar's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, Radar sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 115 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 8, 202652x their median
Monitoramento ilegal da PF contra Mendonça e Messias gera novo constrangimento a Lula Corporação teria feito relatórios ilegais mirando chefe da AGU por não blindar Lulinha, o filho do presidente nas investigações conduzidas por Mendonça Leia mais em: https://t.co/rWLEtqYb0q
- Aug 21, 202646x their median
Em decisão, Mendonça defende direito constitucional de jornalistas ao sigilo da fonte https://t.co/svkZXk99cS
- Aug 28, 202625x their median
Despreparo de Lula em entrevista ajuda a explicar medo do petista de ir a debates Leia mais em: https://t.co/9o3G6N7Emw
- Sep 4, 202624x their median
Relatório citado por Moraes contra Mendonça não tem data, assinatura nem ‘valor probatório’ https://t.co/pgL5bjlW8J
- Sep 8, 202622x their median
PF vazou possíveis operações contra Rueda e ACM Neto, diz Mendonça https://t.co/0XmqD0Murz
- Sep 7, 202621x their median
Mensagens de Vorcaro e Moraes criam onda de rejeição ao STF nas redes, mostra pesquisa Leia mais em: https://t.co/Ql4PnRWZEe
- Sep 4, 202619x their median
Conselho do MPF dá prazo para Gonet comentar mensagens de Vorcaro https://t.co/X32ZOSRdPK
- Sep 8, 202619x their median
Escândalo das mensagens de Daniel Vorcaro completa uma semana sem resposta no STF Leia mais em: https://t.co/gKCmrPxG35
- Sep 8, 202618x their median
Ao afastar Andrei, Mendonça revela ter sido monitorado ilegalmente pela PF https://t.co/ki5I2KQFv2
- Sep 4, 202618x their median
Relatório ‘sem valor probatório’ da PF foi solicitado por Moraes após embate com Mendonça Leia mais em: https://t.co/tiETvnUdFT
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 417K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 77 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0.808% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.653% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 77 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 52x its own typical post.
- What is Radar's engagement rate on X?
- Radar (@radaronline) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 77 original posts from the last 30 days against 416,794 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, Radar sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @radaronline have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @radaronline post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.