Radar Online engagement report
@radar_online - 125K followers on X
Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 125K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 788 times each, and 0.127% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 724 interactions, about 724x its own typical post.
Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Radar Online's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Radar Online sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 76% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 76% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 3, 2026724x their median
Prince Harry’s recent school visit in Birmingham is facing fresh scrutiny after royal biographer Robert Jobson described the appearance as “very odd” and said the students seemed “distinctly unimpressed.” 👀 Videos from the visit showed one student complaining about cameras and another appearing to turn away as Harry tried to engage. Jobson also criticized Harry’s casual appearance, saying he looked “disheveled” and “a little bit lost” during the event tied to the 2027 Invictus Games. More details at the link below. (📸: X) https://t.co/Kt59OCcOxM
- Oct 3, 202667x their median
King Charles has reportedly given his approval to a service of thanksgiving for his late wife on the 30th anniversary of her death. https://t.co/llDeObWIrY https://t.co/5OzgQQc8aA
- Oct 2, 202619x their median
Meghan Markle came under fire from critics over her latest pricey As Ever offering, a whopping $148 advent calendar she began selling a full month before Halloween, RadarOnline can reveal. https://t.co/89As8iIBwS
- Oct 2, 20268.0x their median
Kyle Cooke is living it up in Las Vegas! 🎰🍾 The Summer House star was spotted bringing the energy to TAO BEACH LAS VEGAS. (📸: JPASC24) https://t.co/Tgr7SaDcjg
- Oct 3, 20267.0x their median
Prince harry's plans to pay tribute to his late mother could 'risk' taking the attention away from Queen Camilla. https://t.co/4rU7gT05wk https://t.co/g06PV1Hdav
- Oct 3, 20266.0x their median
Charles Spencer 'snubbed' the Queen's Princess Diana funeral tribute in his eulogy, and now he's explained the reason behind the decision. https://t.co/Cw84RpPWwO https://t.co/4PPTcc80Y5
- Oct 2, 20265.0x their median
Prince Harry's awkward STEM school visit was torn apart by a top royal editor and biographer who criticized the Duke of Sussex's appearance, RadarOnline can reveal. https://t.co/Nw3sS5Ofd8
- Oct 2, 20264.0x their median
Sylvester Stallone opened up about what his life was like before making a name for himself in Hollywood. https://t.co/bjCM14dViO https://t.co/c7xN72IpZs
- Oct 3, 20263.0x their median
Dakota Johnson and MGK sparked romance rumors after meeting at Taylor Swift's wedding. https://t.co/VhQDEevdlW https://t.co/sO736QtuFN
- Oct 3, 20263.0x their median
Ben Affleck may play a businessman running for office in the new movie Animals, but that doesn't mean he's interested in going down that path in real life https://t.co/VOanFwCyd9 https://t.co/LS7VXqRO0e
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 125K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 788 times each, and 0.127% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 724 interactions, about 724x its own typical post.
- What is Radar Online's engagement rate on X?
- Radar Online (@radar_online) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 125,165 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Radar Online sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @radar_online have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @radar_online post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.