Back to @qtf's profile

Fernanda Familiar engagement report

@qtf - 912K followers on X

Measured over 136 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 912K followers
Per impression
2.22%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
1.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
265
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.63/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 265 interactions against 912K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 136 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 136 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 217K interactions, about 1380x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #últimahoraff, #últimahora, #mexicali.

Measured over 136 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #últimahoraff, #últimahora, #mexicali.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fernanda Familiar's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Fernanda Familiar sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,632 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,632 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,982 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 268 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 20261380x their median

    👀 WTF?? Hayden Panettiere JUST DIED at 36… 3 months after her bombshell exposure of the Elite Hollywood/ Music system. Above all she was a mom. She leaves behind her daughter Kaya. Barely three months after she finally spoke up. In her new book and on that Jay Shetty podcast she told the world what happened when she was 18 and Heroes was exploding. A “trusted” female friend dragged her downstairs on a boat out at sea and literally put her in bed next to a naked, very famous older British rocker. She had to fight him off and hide for the rest of the night. That was 18 years ago. She still never named him. Or the woman who set it up. And now she’s dead. Cause still unknown. She had just flown from LA down to the South with her boyfriend when it happened. Hollywood is pure evil. Who was the rocker? Who was the friend that kept doing these setups? @StephenBaldwin7 you were right… IT’S ALL OF THEM.

    181K32K2.2K1.5K25M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026106x their median

    Vivirán por siempre en nuestros corazones. Descansen en Paz 🕊️ https://t.co/1nbi0MCWqb

    24K3.1K308299658K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202697x their median

    El Gobierno dedicó 7 meses (dice que sólo 7) a analizar todos y cada uno de los tuits que puse. Los clasificó, desmenuzó, vio quién los compartió, de quién hablaba, con quién hablaba y a quién reclamaba. Todos y cada uno de mis 963 tuits. Luego, en una conferencia nacional, pusieron mi cuenta para que cualquier desubicado pueda localizarme, desmenuzar mis tuits, e ir armando mi perfil personal con pedacitos de información mía que haya ido soltando a lo largo de 30 mil tuits. Y no sólo me pusieron a mí, sino a otras 60 personas, ciudadanos sin cargo público que no tenemos ninguna obligación. Encima lo financiaron con dinero público, aportaciones nuestras que debían buscar el bien general de los mexicanos utilizado para su beneficio personal y en nuestra contra. @LuisaAlcalde eres una fascista con todas sus letras.

    20K5.9K26861263K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202679x their median

    Declaración Solemne de la Embajada de China en México El 15 de septiembre, en la víspera del Día de la Independencia de México, la Embajada de Estados Unidos en México publicó en redes sociales un posteo, alegando que los fuegos artificiales y otros símbolos utilizados en las celebraciones de la fiesta “no se hacen en México”, y peor aún, con la frase “Viva México, Made in China” se burlaba de esta fiesta nacional mexicana, y difamaba la cooperación comercial entre China y México. En la fiesta nacional, el día más solemne del país de residencia, una embajada, en lugar de expresar sus felicitaciones, la tomó como un pretexto para atacar a un tercero. Lo que ha hecho esta Embajada carece de las mínimas cortesías diplomáticas y del respeto básico hacia el pueblo mexicano. La Embajada de China en México expresa su fuerte descontento y contundente rechazo. El Día de la Independencia de una nación pertenece a su pueblo. Cómo y con qué celebrarlo, lo decide su propio pueblo. En realidad, “Hecho en China” no es nada nuevo en México. Hace más de cuatro siglos, gracias a “la Nao de China”, la seda y la porcelana del Oriente y la plata de México ya se intercambiaron entre ambas orillas del Océano Pacífico. Detrás de aquel comercio de mercancías, se apreciaba el diálogo y aprendizaje mutuo entre civilizaciones. Hoy, muchos productos chinos han entrado en el mercado mexicano, mientras productos mexicanos como el aguacate y el tequila ya son muy bien acogidos por numerosas familias chinas. Estos estrechos vínculos comerciales son justamente lo que significa la globalización. Un Estado independiente tiene todo derecho a elegir soberanamente a sus socios. La cooperación entre China y México no tiene cálculos geopolíticos, no apunta contra terceras partes ni debe ser objeto de interferencias por terceras partes. La Embajada de Estados Unidos convirtió la fiesta nacional del país de residencia en un escenario para atacar a un tercer país y en ficha para su juego geopolítico, e hizo comentarios irresponsables sobre los demás, dejando totalmente al descubierto su mentalidad de supremacía y hegemonía. La comunidad internacional lo ve con claridad. No pocos internautas han preguntado a la Embajada de Estados Unidos por qué viene a “escupir veneno” en la fiesta de los demás. Instamos a la Embajada de Estados Unidos en México a respetar al país de residencia y fomentar la amistad entre los dos pueblos, en vez de sembrar cizaña y discordia. Esta farsa no logrará engañar a nadie, y solo terminará perjudicándose a sí mismo.

    17K3.3K331243397K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202662x their median

    Si, por puro gusto, hicieron público lo de la visa de Andy, sin que nadie lo hubiera descubierto, es porque se viene algo mucho peor para ellos.

    14K2.5K24540163K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202634x their median

    Ya se va a terminar la mañanera y no le han preguntado a la presidente Sheinbaum sobre el ex trabajador de Rocha Moya que tenía CIEN MIL tabletas de fentanilo. Pero luego dicen que no son narcopartido…

    7.0K1.8K1611757K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202633x their median

    Inolvidable la apasionada defensa que Camila Martínez hacía de Rocha Moya. ¿Ahora qué va a decir? https://t.co/bZ7tYZCs98

    6.2K2.2K29270162K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202629x their median

    Aunque el Cerovotos lo niegue, aquí hay video de cómo le aplaudía al Rocha Moya. ¿Conocen la vergüenza, o esa ni por asomo? https://t.co/WM7CQK41O5

    5.1K2.3K1575743K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202627x their median

    Por el bien de todos, primero los pobres. Excepto si esos pobres quieren agua limpia y son de Ecatepec. Ahí no aplica porque la ministra Estela Ríos va a votar en contra de su derecho HUMANO al agua. Así los ministros del acordeón 🪗 https://t.co/JM1b7aTCHW

    4.7K2.4K682844K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202624x their median

    La encuesta presentada hoy por Enkoll dice que Morena es el partido con la mayor opinión positiva. Yo pregunto: ¿a ti te encuestaron? Porque a mí, no. https://t.co/jaZXjld91i

    3.2K6682.2K18197K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#últimahoraff#últimahora#mexicali#alaire#cerovotos

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 265 interactions against 912K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 136 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 136 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 217K interactions, about 1380x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #últimahoraff, #últimahora, #mexicali.

What is Fernanda Familiar's engagement rate on X?
Fernanda Familiar (@qtf) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 136 original posts from the last 30 days against 911,682 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Fernanda Familiar sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,632 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @qtf have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @qtf post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going