Back to @qatnology's profile

قطر نولوجي engagement report

@qatnology - 183K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 183K followers
Per impression
0.565%
8.5K views on a typical post
Reach
4.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
48
interactions (median)
Saved
0.118%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 183K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 0.565% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

قطر نولوجي's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, قطر نولوجي sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 214 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 202631x their median

    Surprise, John 😏 Full look at iPhone Ultra. https://t.co/6rWQ8d0iqm

    1.3K605339726K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202611x their median

    كل الوان اجهزة ايفون برو من 2019 الى اليوم https://t.co/bEYlHw7tJ2

    401201870541K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20269.7x their median

    كل الكلام الحين عن ايفون 18 برو و ايفون دوو لكن حسب الاشاعات ابل تجهز أكبر اعادة تصميم في تاريخ الايفون للعام القادم ايفون 20 بمناسبة مرور 20 سنة على اطلاق الايفون وهذا تصميمه حسب الاشاعات 👀 https://t.co/AgFwIZ8zIj

    405113812232K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.7x their median

    تحس ابل عندها مشكلة مع الكفرات الشفافة و لازم الكفر الشفاف الرسمي يكون فيه شي غريب 😊 https://t.co/J5czSjxLa4

    259510061K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.0x their median

    مع تحديث iOS 27 توفر اقوى نموذج ذكاء اصطناعي من ابل اسمه AFM 3 Core Advanced حجمه 20 مليار parameter يشغل منها 1 ل 4 مليار parameter عند الاستخدام ويشتغل على جوالات ايفون 17 + برو مباشرة بدون انترنت https://t.co/I99DOaoqI1

    225134043K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20265.0x their median

    في ايفون 18 برو + برو ماكس تم نقل حساس الاشعة تحت الحمراء … تحت الشاشة هالحساس يتم استخدامه مع حساس الوجه Face ID لهذا الجزء الاساسي من ال Face ID صار اصغر في الجوال مع الزاوية و الاضاءة الصح تقدر تشوفه تحت الشاشة 👇🏼 https://t.co/519xQSsFTg

    226104044K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20264.7x their median

    فرق حجم قطعة التبريد بين ايفون 17 برو و ايفون 18 برو اكبر ب 3 مرات و يعطي تبريد افضل https://t.co/Wo32FelDIj

    21384227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.5x their median

    ليش شاشة ايفون دوو الخارجية شكلها D و الازرار كلها صارت على الجنب اليمين ؟ هالصورة تشرح السبب المساحة المتبقية .. نفس مساحة الجوالات العادية و هالشي يسهل تشغيل التطبيقات بدون تعديل كبير عليها https://t.co/aYmvjmfV5r

    1961110034K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.4x their median

    رسمياً تحديث iOS 27 راح يتوفر للجميع يوم الاثنين 14 سبتمبر التحديث يدعم نفس اجهزة iOS 26 من ايفون 11 وما بعده سيري الجديدة بالذكاء الاصطناعي تحتاج ايفون 15 برو أو أحدث التحديث يوفر اكثر من 250 ميزة وتغيير جديد 👌🏼 https://t.co/ZoDUavcPQt

    185197151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.9x their median

    لو كنت من محبي لون Sierra Blue في ايفون 13 برو لون Glacier الجديد في ايفون 18 برو هو النسخة الاحدث منه 👌🏼 https://t.co/XjdFVSnuXL

    17349035K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 183K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 0.565% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

What is قطر نولوجي's engagement rate on X?
قطر نولوجي (@qatnology) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 182,609 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, قطر نولوجي sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @qatnology have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @qatnology post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going