Punk(2898 🙌💎) engagement report
@punk2898 - 89K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.106%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Punk(2898 🙌💎)'s engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.106%, Punk(2898 🙌💎) sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 68% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 36% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 239 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 5, 202436x their median
https://t.co/9z9qDwjzou
- Sep 22, 202612x their median
请币圈从业者们,慢下脚步,阅读此文,听听我的声音。 转发,点赞,评论此文者,将会抽取三名幸运者,我会请他们吃大餐,回答他们的任意问题,并且送出幸运骰子一副。 https://t.co/V0j0RmldUu
- Jan 7, 202610x their median
为什么说:人生发财靠康波? 你的人生财富积累,不在于你是在南开上的学,还是在清华上的学 你的人生财富积累,只在于你对人生的价格低点的把握 但是在人 60 年的一生中、参与经济活动 30 年的一生中 你的人生价格低点只会出现 3 次 你出生在康波中的位置,就决定了你在什么年龄有机会 人生财富积累的真谛是什么? 你的人生财富积累只存在于:商品、地产、黄金、股票(数字货币)
- Aug 30, 20269.2x their median
卧槽!《红色警戒》真人版已经看不出 AI 痕迹了,AI 大电影感觉用不了一年就能上映,尤其《牛来》告诉大家龙标其实很简单😂 而且 80后秒懂,但是推特上 80 后多么?还有人知道《红色警戒》么?
- Jul 10, 20268.4x their median
中国太牛逼了,马斯克用“筷子”夹住回收火箭,中国用“网”接住回收火箭 按照中国制造,这个可回收的成本还会再降低 10 倍 https://t.co/67sMbRfJBu
- Sep 10, 20258.6x their median
被下架视频 - 我叫许家印,我亲自揭露恒大2.4万亿窟窿怎么捅出来的 一、债务大师 - 通过软硬兼施,把土地出让金从 1 个亿变成首付“500万” - 通过“空手套白狼”从银行贷出600万 - 通过“千帆借浪”模式说服施工方垫资 二、为什么房价上涨? - 地方政府的土地财政需求 - 银行的利差驱动 三、恒大为什么垮了? - 在巅峰时期盲目多元化,投资矿泉水、汽车、旅游等业务,但除了足球外几乎都以失败告终 - 特别是恒大汽车投入千亿却只卖出千辆,成为巨大笑话 - “三条红线”政策的出台,切断了恒大“借新还旧”的输血管道,导致其资金链迅速崩溃 四、许家印为什么有点傻? 事后才开始通过“技术性离婚”和“破产保护”等手段转移优质资产至海外,但最终被国家铁拳制止
- Sep 18, 20267.5x their median
https://t.co/w5W15h8z2A
- Aug 15, 20265.5x their median
编译了半个月指纹浏览器,差不多完工了,各种检测上来看基本上跟市面上付费的表现一致。 我再整理一下,下周就开源给大家! https://t.co/kSdP1QIfOd
- Aug 20, 20262.7x their median
许家印认罪视频流出 ⬇️ 《亲自揭露恒大 2.4 万亿窟窿怎么捅出来的》 https://t.co/uToM2VtiXv
- Sep 14, 20262.7x their median
人是什么时候没有心气的? 还是麦家懂人性 https://t.co/FzhHMsmJi7
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.106%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.
- What is Punk(2898 🙌💎)'s engagement rate on X?
- Punk(2898 🙌💎) (@punk2898) has an engagement rate of 0.106%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 88,941 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.106%, Punk(2898 🙌💎) sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @punk2898 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @punk2898 post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.