Back to @pulte's profile

Pulte engagement report

@pulte - 3.0M followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.044%
of 3.0M followers
Per impression
0.995%
130K views on a typical post
Reach
4.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
27 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 3.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 130K times each, and 0.995% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 39x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pulte's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.044%, Pulte sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 1, 202639x their median

    Dream team. 🇺🇸 A historic Cabinet meeting at Camp David with the most successful, transformational Cabinet! https://t.co/oXOBzHm4HI

    39K6.0K4.5K5071.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202635x their median

    Good News! In addition to the Historic DECLASSIFICATIONS (Transparency!) by the President, we are, this morning, Executing a 5th and Near Final Round of TERMINATIONS, an approximately 30% Staff Reduction from Weeks Ago. The Intelligence Community must protect the American people, NOT the political whims of the bloated and corrupt elite class.

    35K7.9K1.9K476709K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202619x their median

    Since becoming Acting Director of National Intelligence, our team has been smartly, and carefully, reducing the size of ODNI, re-focusing ODNI on national security, the law, and the statute. As of this evening, we just finished a 4th round of thoughtful, measured layoffs. Thank you!

    20K3.5K1.0K177622K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202615x their median

    After speaking with the President Trump and Jay Clayton, we have decided the DNI transition will take place this coming Monday. I am eternally grateful to President Trump for the opportunity to serve as Director of National Intelligence, while he completed historic declassifications and we right sized the ODNI. I have no doubt that Jay will do a tremendous job. I have offered Jay my complete and total support as he transitions to take over this incredible agency!

    16K2.4K1.1K115879K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202615x their median

    So deeply grateful to POTUS for letting me be acting Director of National Intelligence. He is, truly, the best, and it is a blessing to work for him. While it’s been only a few weeks, so much has already been accomplished —Operationally, AND, Transparency. Thank you, POTUS.

    16K2.1K83663250K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202614x their median

    Thank you President Trump for the opportunity of a lifetime serving as your Director of National Intelligence!

    17K1.2K67849503K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202614x their median

    https://t.co/a0FPzXKeki

    14K3.5K445121632K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202611x their median

    https://t.co/ru4EYMjTs2

    11K3.2K249125372K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202610x their median

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac both accommodate Sharia Law-compliant home financing. Fannie Mae even has a specific loan code for: “Musharaka Islamic Finance Mortgages.” Freddie Mac explicitly recognizes financing “designed to comply with Islamic law.” Wow. https://t.co/VsIHvAD0WV

    8.2K3.9K7425491.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20268.7x their median

    https://t.co/0bE0jiReju

    9.7K1.1K47558224K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 3.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 130K times each, and 0.995% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 39x its own typical post.

What is Pulte's engagement rate on X?
Pulte (@pulte) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,970,269 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.044%, Pulte sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pulte have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pulte post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going