Back to @prrobbins's profile

Peter Robbins engagement report

@prrobbins - 135K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.093%
of 135K followers
Per impression
2.33%
5.4K views on a typical post
Reach
3.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
126
interactions (median)
Saved
0.157%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 135K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 2.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 9% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 297 interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Peter Robbins's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.093%, Peter Robbins sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,259 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,259 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,930 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 248 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 20262.4x their median

    Lesson from 50 years in the markets: The longer I've traded, the less impressed I am by complexity. A simple edge executed with discipline can be powerful. A brilliant strategy you can't follow is worthless.

    238213807.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.1x their median

    Trading gets easier when you stop trying to control the outcome of every trade. Control the risk. Control the execution. Control your response. Let the market decide the rest.

    213192806.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20261.8x their median

    The edge is simple. Executing it consistently is not. After more than 50 years in the markets, I've learned that successful trading isn't about finding secret indicators or predicting every market move. It requires: • a proven edge • disciplined execution • sound risk management • emotional resilience The market teaches these lessons eventually. The Trader's Journey was written to help traders learn them sooner.

    1663132117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.7x their median

    Trading doesn't reward certainty. It rewards preparation. You don't need to know what happens next. You need to know: When you'll enter. Where you're wrong. How much you'll risk. When you'll exit. What you'll do if conditions change. Prepare for uncertainty instead of trying to eliminate it.

    163183317.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.6x their median

    Lesson from 50 years in the markets: The market is an expensive place to discover you have an ego problem. Learn to be wrong. Learn to take the loss. Learn to move on. Your account will thank you.

    157172416.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    True or False: Two traders using exactly the same strategy should produce roughly the same results.

    81895411K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Lesson from 50 years in the markets: Amateurs obsess over what they might make. Professionals know exactly what they're willing to lose. That's not pessimism. That's risk management.

    149142316.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    One idea: The goal isn't to make a fortune on your next trade. It's to still be trading five years from now. Survival isn't a boring objective. It's what gives compounding a chance.

    131172437.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    What separates knowing from doing? Pressure. Most traders know their rules. The real test is whether they can follow them when money and emotion are involved.

    133132039.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    One of the hardest skills in trading is learning not to react. To the loss. To the missed trade. To the sudden move. To the fear of being wrong. The goal is to create enough space between what happens and what you do next to respond with clarity and logic instead of emotion.

    126142535.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 135K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 2.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 9% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 297 interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

What is Peter Robbins's engagement rate on X?
Peter Robbins (@prrobbins) has an engagement rate of 0.093%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 135,499 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.093%, Peter Robbins sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,259 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @prrobbins have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @prrobbins post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going