ProfNote engagement report
@profnote - 91K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 864 interactions against 91K followers, an engagement rate of 0.97%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 3.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #arknights, #アークナイツ, #loz.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #arknights, #アークナイツ, #loz.
Compared with accounts its own size
ProfNote's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.97%, ProfNote sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.671% to 2.53%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 51 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 7, 202621x their median
Air Groove sensei (27yo) https://t.co/3StTs8sFwh
- Sep 19, 202620x their median
Pick your teacher https://t.co/NXh0i0Lu1U
- Sep 16, 202617x their median
Super Creek Sensei (26yo) https://t.co/L2MtLi9M2C
- Aug 18, 202612x their median
When our instructors at Krenz Artwork Academy practice from photo reference, they work in four different ways. 1. Straight extraction, normal proportions. Read the gesture, the shape characteristics, the height and build of the figure. Then get it down as it is. 2. Change the camera angle. Set up a space seen at eye level, turned 45 degrees, and draw a box with 2x2x4 proportions inside it. Rebuild the pose in that space, working from where the joints sit: shoulders, knees, the coordinates that hold the figure together. Turn the box and the figure inside turns with it. This is where perspective boxes do the work. 3. Same angle, different camera distance and focal length. A mid-range shot and a wide-angle shot give you two very different images. This one is harder to control. 4. Extract the gesture, change the proportions. Push it toward an American comics build, or toward chibi proportions. One and four are flat translation. Two and three are spatial thinking. They ask for different skills. Think about your own practice for a moment. If you only train flat thinking, copying goes fine, but the pose stops being editable the moment you work without reference. If you only train perspective, space, and boxed figures, your grasp of shape falls behind and the drawing comes out stiff. Both sides need the work. That is how a drawing ends up with correct perspective and rhythm at the same time.
- Sep 6, 20267.8x their median
WIP (I'm back) https://t.co/qg4crAtp1f
- Aug 13, 20266.6x their median
mambo https://t.co/RZ24MZWtf9
- Jan 9, 20262.1x their median
✨全ラインナップが解禁✨ 2026年2月4日発売予定 一番くじ 五等分の花嫁 ~一番くじ化5周年のお祝いも私たち全員で分かち合います!~ 【取扱店舗】 一番くじONLINE、一番くじ公式ショップ https://t.co/N80GBWQGLN #五等分の花嫁 https://t.co/BrQZTI0Brj
- Sep 7, 20261.5x their median
one more WIP https://t.co/C366JzHdL1
- Sep 16, 2026
https://t.co/3DTqALPy8M
- May 25, 2026
my #OC https://t.co/aSDjEIzeKF
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 864 interactions against 91K followers, an engagement rate of 0.97%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 3.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #arknights, #アークナイツ, #loz.
- What is ProfNote's engagement rate on X?
- ProfNote (@profnote) has an engagement rate of 0.97%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 90,988 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.97%, ProfNote sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @profnote have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @profnote post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.