Back to @prof_preobr's profile

Проф. Преображенский engagement report

@prof_preobr - 334K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.46%
of 334K followers
Per impression
4.26%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
10.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.09%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.37/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 334K followers, an engagement rate of 0.46%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 4.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dobrindt, #unforgo7ten.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #dobrindt, #unforgo7ten.

Compared with accounts its own size

Проф. Преображенский's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.46%, Проф. Преображенский sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 494 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 202615x their median

    Tucker Carlson's favourite "political scientist", John Mearsheimer, and his ATROCIOUS predictions on the war in Ukraine: Feb. 2022: "I don't think Russia is going to invade." Sep. 2023: "The Ukrainians are doomed to lose." Jan. 2024: "It's ridiculous to think Ukraine can hold the line in 2024." Apr. 2025: "It's unimaginable Ukraine will hang on beyond 2025." Jul. 2026: "The Russians are slowly moving forward." The Jim Cramer of foreign policy predictions.

    19K3.4K6295212.0M viewsView on X
  • Dec 18, 20257.1x their median

    24 февраля 2022 российский десант высадился в Гостомеле, и огромная колонна армии РФ шла на Киев. Не было никогда цели "защитить Донбасс". Цель была взять Киев, захватить и поработить Украину. И эта цель остаётся неизменной. Не понимать этого может только идиот.

    8.5K2.0K367451.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.2x their median

    Моди Путину сегодня в Бишкеке: пора прекратить войну, пора перейти от бесконечной войны к окончанию войны, это нужно во имя человечности. Судя по мимике и дёрганию ножек фюрера, ему ужасно не нравится, что его любимую войну требуют прекратить. https://t.co/ufh5BXiCWt

    5.5K65720523220K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.1x their median

    Медведев 28 июля: мобилизации не будет. Небензя 20 августа: мобилизации не будет. Песков 21 августа: мобилизации не будет. Песков 25 августа: мобилизации не будет. Медведев 28 августа: мобилизации не будет. Путин 1 сентября: мобилизации не будет. Путин 3 сентября: мобилизации не будет. Медведев 9 сентября: мобилизации не будет. На моей памяти так активно режим отрицал что-либо только один раз: в январе-феврале 2022 года режим вот так же каждый день уверял, что не будет вторжения в Украину.

    4.2K44915213173K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.8x their median

    Верить сегодня в разбитую пробирку с чумой? Это то же самое, что верить сегодня в чудодейственность мощей. Не было никакой разбитой пробирки. Было что-то иное. Настолько серьёзное, что понадобилось выдумывать пробирку с чумой.

    3.6K39524425130K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.7x their median

    Путин и новгородский губернатор Дронов обсуждают, что в регионе 54% школ нуждаются в капитальном ремонте. Больше половины школ - в аварийном состоянии, понимаете? А губернатор говорит - денег на всё не хватает. А ведь есть такая штука - 50 000 000 000 000 рублей. 50 триллионов рублей. Их Россия потратила на войну. На эти деньги можно было отремонтировать аварийные школы не только Новгородской области, а вообще все аварийные школы по всей стране, в каждом регионе России. И построить ещё столько же новых школ. И ещё дофига денег осталось бы. Но нет. Эти деньги Россия потратила на войну. На то, чтобы разрушать школы и убивать детей в другой стране.

    3.5K53410416146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.6x their median

    Какие "прекрасные" люди стали депутатами от "Альтернативы для Германии" в Саксонии-Анхальт. Франк-Рональд Бишофф, с 1977 по 1989 годы - штатный офицер Мингосбезопасности ГДР (Штази). Таким даже платить за облизывание Путина не надо, они это от души делают, они сами такие же. https://t.co/l3USzcB55l

    3.2K6831622159K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.5x their median

    Пошла волна возмущения тем, что Зеленский заявил о небезопасности российского воздушного пространства. Вот, например, Собчак негодует. А можно посмотреть на негодование этих людей по поводу небезопасности уже пятый год украинского воздушного пространства? https://t.co/3yGuDK4K2j

    3.4K299160990K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.5x their median

    В день начала Второй мировой полезно вспомнить рассказ Путина о том, как коварная Польша бесчеловечно заставила пацифиста Гитлера напасть на себя. А Гитлер так не хотел, он был за мир, прямо как Путин теперь. https://t.co/hcn2nZQQKo

    3.1K5991003493K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.2x their median

    Медведев в третий раз за последние две недели заявил сегодня, что мобилизации не будет. Простой вопрос: а зачем три раза-то за две недели говорить о том, чего не будет? https://t.co/t6JL16Kdh8

    2.9K24625022102K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dobrindt#unforgo7ten

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 334K followers, an engagement rate of 0.46%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 4.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dobrindt, #unforgo7ten.

What is Проф. Преображенский's engagement rate on X?
Проф. Преображенский (@prof_preobr) has an engagement rate of 0.46%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 333,553 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.46%, Проф. Преображенский sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @prof_preobr have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @prof_preobr post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going