Back to @pritipatel's profile

Priti Patel MP engagement report

@pritipatel - 453K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.105%
of 453K followers
Per impression
3.25%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
3.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
479
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 479 interactions against 453K followers, an engagement rate of 0.105%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 3.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.9K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Priti Patel MP's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.105%, Priti Patel MP sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video26% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link70% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 26% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 70% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 427 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 24, 202614x their median

    So ‘No10 North’ is basically going to be a government funded influencer account for Burnham. Who knew 🙄 https://t.co/RETnLueVpD

    5.0K1.3K333233889K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20267.3x their median

    🚨 WATCH: No 10 releases "Then vs Now" photos of Andy Burnham and his Cabinet https://t.co/AKIyZD9c4p

    2.7K163418186649K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20267.1x their median

    The British government has sunk to a new low with Andy Burnham appointing a convicted fraudster to one of the most senior roles in government.  This criminal will have access to classified intelligence and sensitive papers, so what vetting has been undertaken by the Cabinet Secretary and senior civil servants, or did Burnham just want to reward his friend and fellow plotter. Her hard Left views and policies she'll push will also undermine our economic freedoms and harm our economy. https://t.co/WmNA5Yw3A8

    2.2K55852767308K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.4x their median

    Andy from Manchester leads a morally distorted government which exists only for its self serving preservation & appeasement of the left. Labour are mortally bankrupt when it comes to the national security and defence of our allies.  2026 will go down in the history as the year when Britain walked away from its allies, from Israel to the Gulf states and failed to be a serious leader at the time of global strife - when the world needed leadership. https://t.co/eUueYj25AB

    2.0K3945704142K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20265.7x their median

    Andy Burnham has betrayed PC Harper’s family. He has let down our police officers who routinely run towards danger to protect us all. It is a travesty of justice to let PC Harper's killers walk free and a damming indictment of this Labour Government that Ministers will not block the release of these killers.

    2.2K3851081341K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20265.4x their median

    Labour and Ed Miliband keep spreading misinformation about complex issues in the Middle East and their anti-Israel rhetoric risks fuelling antisemitism. It's disgraceful, dangerous and irresponsible for Labour to misrepresent facts on the ground and it's appalling that they fail to criticise the Hamas terrorists who breach the ceasefire, refuse to disarm and harm people in Gaza. https://t.co/Z2MMM0fZq9

    1.5K35564655190K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20264.8x their median

    With tens of thousands of migrants illegally entering Spain, there is a risk they could find routes into Gibraltar and travel through Europe and head towards the UK. Spain has already granted amnesties to illegal migrants and this is encouraging more to come. The UK Government must urgently set out its response to these risks, the discussions it's having with European cities and the actions it will take. https://t.co/CtNc4LQ7pq

    1.3K182760941.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.6x their median

    Labour’s reckless £35 billion Chagos surrender deal fell apart under the Starmer government and it’s high time that Andy Burnham tore up this atrocious surrender treaty and put Britain’s security and hard-pressed taxpayers first. https://t.co/Us5tRo5ycV

    1.7K357691221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.0x their median

    Labour has pushed the U.K. into record levels of debt - now almost  £3tn.  By the end of July, public sector net debt stood at £2.985tn — roughly £96bn higher than a year ago. Under Labour the U.K. is spending more on debt interest than we do on defence, police, and prisons combined.   Labour’s economic mismanagement will have significant consequences for years to come. https://t.co/f5S37Vdfux

    1.1K3174383639K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20263.9x their median

    PC Andrew Harper’s killing was horrendous and deeply shocking. He was a respected police officer, he was a husband and a son.  Thanks to his devoted family we worked together to honour Andrew’s life by introducing Harper’s Law - a law to give mandatory life sentences to those who unlawfully kill an emergency worker in the course of their duty.  Andrew's killers were the very worst of humanity and should be stripped of their freedom and face their full sentence.   It is utterly shameful that the Labour government is looking to release his murderers from prison early.  Labour must stop this and honour Andrew's memory and respect his family by ensuring his killers serve their full sentence. https://t.co/LwzHQzXP4H

    1.6K26237423K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 479 interactions against 453K followers, an engagement rate of 0.105%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 3.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.9K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Priti Patel MP's engagement rate on X?
Priti Patel MP (@pritipatel) has an engagement rate of 0.105%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 453,235 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.105%, Priti Patel MP sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pritipatel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pritipatel post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going