Pranksy engagement report
@pranksy - 434K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 434K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.579% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 387x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Pranksy's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.02%, Pranksy sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 82% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 8, 2026387x their median
The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time -- first trailer! November 5, 2026. https://t.co/ObqXaLOyjl
- Aug 16, 2026185x their median
En 2008, Elon Musk estaba a 12 días de la quiebra. De pie en un salón de Hollywood, intentaba vender un auto de $109,000 dólares a gente que pensaba que estaba loco. Su propio Roadster estaba aparcado afuera, como si fuera una simple bicicleta. Empezó hablando de dinero: El Congreso había aprobado 25.000 millones para fabricar autos eficientes. Los Big Three volaron a Washington y lo pidieron… para pagar sueldos de sus gasolina-devoradores. El Congreso dijo que sí. “Eso les da hasta febrero”, dijo Musk. Tesla pidió del mismo fondo… pero para lo que realmente se había creado: un auto más barato. Y entonces soltó la frase que nadie en la sala registró: Tesla no paga dividendos. Nunca lo hará. Cada dólar de cada Roadster de 109.000 va directo al siguiente auto más barato. Su sueldo: el mínimo legal. No les dijo que la empresa tenía días de caja. Ni que si no cerraban una ronda de emergencia antes de Nochebuena… se acababa todo. Habló de celulares. De cómo los primeros costaban una fortuna. De que no se llega al barato sin vender primero el caro. 100 autos fabricados. El número 100 salía el martes. Y él mismo entregaría las llaves. Seis meses después, GM se declaró en quiebra. El tipo del sueldo mínimo… no.
- Aug 14, 2026122x their median
🚨 BREAKING: Nigel Farage has won the Clacton by-election ➡️ FARAGE: 22,239 (+1,014) - 62.8% 🗑️ BINFACE: 9,455 (NEW) - 26.7% 44.37% turnout Changes w/ 2024
- Aug 15, 2026112x their median
le han pitado este penalti al Sevilla, enserio? creo que es el mayor robo que he visto en mi vida. Los del VAR que hacian? https://t.co/Pj4ApveaoL
- Aug 11, 202623x their median
"I want my 99 pence ice cream!" I'm voting for Count Binface "Now the Clacton kids by the slot machines keep singing about bins & cheap ice creams." #Binface #Clacton #Farage #99pIceCream https://t.co/PfBwVui7bO
- Aug 14, 202619x their median
🚨 WATCH: Nigel Farage says he will not attend the Clacton by-election count after advice from the police "There is an organised campaign to disrupt and degrade the result that will take place in a few hours time" https://t.co/aOG7RNISXm
- Sep 13, 202618x their median
There is a verified Gold mew! 1 in 100,000 pull rate! If you pull this you can retire!!!! https://t.co/lRG5hbwazK
- Aug 11, 202613x their median
🚨 Newcastle United are showing interest in Benfica right-back Amar Dedić as they explore defensive reinforcements ahead of the new season. The 23-year-old is already familiar with Newcastle boss Matthias Jaissle, having previously worked under him at RB Salzburg. (Source: @SamC_reports)
- Aug 11, 20269.2x their median
Sounds like I need to make a @RobinhoodCrypto NFT collection?
- Aug 11, 20268.5x their median
Old PFP, who this? https://t.co/iLfN0FT602
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 434K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.579% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 387x its own typical post.
- What is Pranksy's engagement rate on X?
- Pranksy (@pranksy) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 433,693 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.02%, Pranksy sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @pranksy have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @pranksy post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.