Back to @posttmodern's profile

postmodern engagement report

@posttmodern - 138K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.398%
of 138K followers
Per impression
2.24%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
17.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
511
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 511 interactions against 138K followers, an engagement rate of 0.398%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

postmodern's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.398%, postmodern sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 202654x their median

    SON DAKİKA | AKP’li Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya’nın 2,2 milyar ₺’yi iade etmediği ortaya çıktı. (İsmail Saymaz) https://t.co/8YqJJFkFSE

    23K3.6K737365581K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202630x their median

    Fatma Betül Soyan Kaya hakkında beş gündür hiçbir işlem yapılmadı. — 4,4 milyar TL’yi de iade etmedi. — Soruşturma açılmadı. https://t.co/pDxV48PcD6

    13K1.9K18250118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202626x their median

    Text no longer retained for this post.

    13K2657368816K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202622x their median

    ÖNEMLİ — Rojin Kabaiş’in, solunum kasları felç edilerek bayıltıldığı ve ÖLD*RÜLDÜĞÜ ORTAYA ÇIKTI. (Abdurrahman Karabulut — Aile Avukatı)

    10.0K1.0K1302041.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202620x their median

    DİSTOPYA — Son 48 saatte polis dronları, açık alanda alkol tüketen insanlara “Bu bir polis dronudur. Bu bölgede alkol içmek yasaktır. Derhal ayrılın.” anonsu yapıyor. Önce Fatih, ardından Üsküdar sahili… Bu konu, “teknoloji kullanıyoruz” denilerek geçiştirilemeyecek kadar problemli: Hoparlörlü, spot ışıklı, termal ve gece görüşlü gözetleme cihazları… — Baştan belirtelim, “Alkol yasağı” diye bir kanun yok. 2023’te 4250 sayılı kanun üzerinden “hatırlatma genelgesi” çıkartılarak yasak denenmeye çalışıldı fakat çok sürmeden İstanbul Valiliği’nin park, piknik alanı, sahil bandı ve plajlarda alkol tüketimini “önleme” genelgesi iptal edildi. Gerekçe: Temel hak ve özgürlükler ancak kanunla, ölçülü ve demokratik toplum düzeninin gereklerine uygun şekilde sınırlanabilir (Anayasa m.13).” oldu. Genel, orantısız, yaşam tarzına müdahale niteliğindeki bir yasak hukuka aykırıdır. Somut bir rahatsızlık, gürültü veya kamu düzenini bozan davranış yoksa, yalnızca biranın varlığı tek başına suç veya kabahat oluşturmaz. — Ek olarak, Türkiye’de kolluğun drone kullanımını özel olarak, sınırlarını, kayıt sürelerini, silme yükümlülüğünü, hâkim denetimini ve amaç sınırlamasını düzenleyen ayrıntılı bir kanun yok. CMK m.140’taki “teknik araçlarla izleme” ise belirli bir suça ilişkin kuvvetli şüphe, hakim kararı ve son çare şartlarına bağlıdır. Genel asayiş, “alkol içenleri uyarmak” veya “şehir gözetimi” bu şartları karşılamaz. — Şimdi asıl meseleye gelelim. Bugün hedef “açık alanda içki içenler” Peki ya yarın? Sahilde el ele oturan bir çift, parkta öpüşen iki genç, gece yarısı bankta oturup konuşanlar, “uygunsuz” bulunan kıyafetler, “şüpheli” toplanmalar… Bir kez “kamu düzeni ve ahlak” gerekçesiyle havadan müdahale meşrulaştı mı, sınır çizmek çok zorlaşır. Çünkü sınır artık kanunda değil, o anki operatörün veya talimatın “yorumunda” durur. Kaldı ki, “müstehcenlik” maddesi gibi tanımı net olmayan bir kanun maddesi üzerinden istenildiği gibi hareket edilebiliyor. “Kötü bir şey yapmıyorsan korkma” oto-kontrol cümlesidir. Özgürlüğün ölçüsü, devletin sizi izlerken ne kadar nazik davrandığı değil; sizin izlenmeden, uyarılmadan, aydınlatılmadan kamusal hayatı yaşayıp yaşayamamanızdır. — George Orwell’ın Big Brother’ı da önce suçluları izlemek için gelmemişti. Önce “düzeni” izledi. İstanbul gibi milyonların yaşadığı, sahillerinin, sur diplerinin, parklarının sosyalleşme alanı olduğu bir kentte, gökyüzünden hoparlörle “derhal ayrılın” demek, yalnızca alkol denetimi değildir. Kamusal alanın kimin olduğunu, orada kimin nasıl durabileceğini devletin tek taraflı belirlediği bir rejim işaretidir. — Hukukun işi tam da buradadır: Teknolojiyi yasaklamak değil, onu anayasa, kanun, ölçülülük ve yargı denetimi altına sokmak. Aksi halde dronlar sadece alkol içenleri değil, şehirde “uygun” bulunmayan herkesi uyarır. Ve o uyarıya itiraz edebilecek bir yer kalmaz. Şehrin güvenliğinin bu şekilde sağlanacağı iddiası gerçekçi gelmemektedir.

    8.0K1.8K118100282K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202615x their median

    İstanbul Valiliği, 12 Eylül’de Ataköy’de düzenlenmesi planlanan “Anyma” konserini iptal etti. GEREKÇE — Satanist ritüel sembolleri barındırması.

    5.6K3608441.1K7.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202612x their median

    163.000.000 ₺ yatırıp 2.000.000.000 ₺ kazanan eski bir bakan. — Soruşturma açılması ve gözaltına alınması için daha ne olması lazım? Biz de tweet atıyoruz, vekiller de. https://t.co/0omCUY9Msv

    5.0K837731065K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20266.4x their median

    SON DAKİKA | Silivri’den tahliye olan Deniz Göktaş’tan ilk açıklamalar: — “Aileme, anneme, babama ve arkadaşlarıma kavuştuğum için çok mutluyum. Ama Sinem Dedetaş burada, Mehmet Pehlivan burada. Hayalim, üçümüzün hep beraber tek bir arabayla İstanbul’a gitmesiydi. Öyle olmadı. — Oğuzhan Uğur burada. Haberleri izlememe rağmen hâlâ suçlamasını bilmiyorum. — Ve Türkiye’de, sadece burada değil, benim gibi tutuklu yargılanan ya da fikirlerinden dolayı mahkûm olan binlerce insan var. — Tabii ki dışarıda olmak çok güzel, çok özledim. Ama içerisi, dışarısı çok fark etmiyor. — Umarım hep beraber özgürlüğümüze kavuşacağımız bir hâl gelir.” v/ @ankahabera

    3.0K261201092K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20266.0x their median

    — Komedyen Deniz Göktaş, "Ölü Deniz" gösterisindeki kafa dekoruyla birlikte poz verdi. https://t.co/vaZWdhfZGM

    3.0K776831K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20265.7x their median

    — Bugün, Dünya Kahve Günü. https://t.co/ZGYhn78i8a

    2.6K226124837K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 511 interactions against 138K followers, an engagement rate of 0.398%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

What is postmodern's engagement rate on X?
postmodern (@posttmodern) has an engagement rate of 0.398%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 137,737 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.398%, postmodern sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @posttmodern have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @posttmodern post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going