Back to @pinitreply's profile

Context Pin It (P) engagement report

@pinitreply - 131K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.814%
of 131K followers
Per impression
2.39%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
34.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
935
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 935 interactions against 131K followers, an engagement rate of 0.814%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 2.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.4K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Context Pin It (P)'s engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.814%, Context Pin It (P) sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 70 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 20263.7x their median

    Beautiful at night https://t.co/kf6H13my2R

    2.7K3883878910K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.7x their median

    Handheld Vacuum Cleaner Outdoor Review https://t.co/QS56BNTdPo

    1.9K2813861270K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.6x their median

    Everything will be easy https://t.co/BvX28GEheW

    1.7K31034646343K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20261.8x their median

    A corporate gift that actually makes an impression… https://t.co/PM0udWIwo5

    1.1K2733298268K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    My keyboard was THIS close to growing legs… 😭💀 https://t.co/OkuvC8sPWT

    4602403484126K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    A commercial cold-press juicer that delivers juice in 3 seconds… https://t.co/MSFBQSR9jN

    428244357468K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    Bored? Try This! https://t.co/lbnuDzoQpT

    413249363124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    WOW… that’s actually SO cool 🤯🔥 https://t.co/SUjFT8UGLG

    412234334247K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    That ice cream looks SO thick and creamy… https://t.co/hx5zbCBKsk

    384244344140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    Unboxing the Triple Aero 15’6 Pro Max 💻 https://t.co/1456yq068f

    379222369020K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 935 interactions against 131K followers, an engagement rate of 0.814%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 2.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.4K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is Context Pin It (P)'s engagement rate on X?
Context Pin It (P) (@pinitreply) has an engagement rate of 0.814%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 130,650 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.814%, Context Pin It (P) sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pinitreply have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pinitreply post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going