Back to @pewresearch's profile

Pew Research Center engagement report

@pewresearch - 417K followers on X

Measured over 85 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 417K followers
Per impression
0.479%
5.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.086%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 417K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 85 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 0.479% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 85 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 182x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #pewknightinitiative, #americandream.

Measured over 85 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #ai, #pewknightinitiative, #americandream.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pew Research Center's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Pew Research Center sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 260 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 2026182x their median

    45% of Americans view India favorably, while 50% view it unfavorably. These ratings are some of the lowest since 2008, when we began asking this question. https://t.co/A1l6Rhm8XM

    3.9K456492274846K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202634x their median

    For the first time, a majority of adults under 30 say they’re more concerned than excited about #AI. Their concern is now on par with those in their 30s and 40s, and those 65 and up. https://t.co/NQCFwnD09n

    6432232562157K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202626x their median

    Latter-day Saints are, on average, among the most religious Americans. For example, roughly seven-in-ten Latter-day Saints say that: 🔹Religion is very important in their lives. 🔹They pray daily 🔹They attend religious services in person at least weekly. #LatterDaySaints #ReligiousLife

    60595152535K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202611x their median

    We asked adults in four South Asian countries—#Bangladesh, #India, #Pakistan and #SriLanka —how they view their regional neighbors. Only Sri Lanka receives more positive than negative ratings in all the other three. India has the broadest range in favorability. https://t.co/e2GdorRDR6

    22751271633K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20269.8x their median

    In nearly every middle-income country we surveyed, more people say the U.S. interferes in other countries’ affairs than China. https://t.co/MOGUTkgAEb

    1896071714K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.4x their median

    Over one-third of recently published pages on the internet may have been written or substantially edited by #AI. In a July 2026 snapshot of webpages, 35% of the pages that were published after the release of ChatGPT show signs of AI authorship. https://t.co/OJ5ZaXEJSv

    1165021114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.3x their median

    In our spring survey, 35% of Canadians said the United States is a reliable partner to their country, down from 83% in 2022, the last time we asked this question. https://t.co/S1ZnHlZtEG

    106519919K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.8x their median

    AI-authored content has become increasingly common online, but where is it coming from? This growth has been driven almost entirely by commercial (.com) websites. #AIContent #AIAuthorship https://t.co/TMG6AxNbRo

    112452413K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.6x their median

    More Americans say data centers have a negative than positive effect on the environment, home energy costs and people’s quality of life nearby. In contrast, they are more likely to see positive than negative effects on local jobs and local tax revenue. What are your thoughts on #DataCenters?

    1003019924K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.0x their median

    How do Americans view themselves ideologically? 🤔? 🤔 On an 11-point scale from very liberal (0) to very conservative (10), Americans in both parties averaged closer to the middle than one of the ends. #PoliticalIdeology #USPolitics https://t.co/wCegu3Gwdq

    99332512K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ai#pewknightinitiative#americandream#artificialintelligence#healthsupplements

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 417K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 85 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 0.479% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 85 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 182x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #pewknightinitiative, #americandream.

What is Pew Research Center's engagement rate on X?
Pew Research Center (@pewresearch) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 85 original posts from the last 30 days against 416,877 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Pew Research Center sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pewresearch have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pewresearch post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going