Pete Santilli 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🎙️ engagement report
@petersantilli - 147K followers on X
Measured over 108 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 147K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 108 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 108 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 499x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #petesantilli, #truth, #cia.
Measured over 108 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #petesantilli, #truth, #cia.
Compared with accounts its own size
Pete Santilli 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🎙️'s engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.025%, Pete Santilli 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🎙️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 91% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 569 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 10, 2026499x their median
Retired aerospace machinist. Selfie rant. 5 minutes of fury. “I built the safety disc brake system for those elevators in those towers.” His claim: The Twin Towers weren’t a normal skyscraper stack. At the 50th floor — sealed. Transfer lobby. Separate elevators up. Fire suppression. Positive pressure. So a fire downstairs doesn’t turn the top into a torch. Then he asks the question that made him explode: If a jet hits the 80th or 90th floor… how does jet fuel run all the way to the bottom if the 50th floor was airtight sealed? “They lied to you.” 25 years of screaming it. Heavy language. Watch with the volume ready. 🎥
- Sep 10, 2026350x their median
Bill Maher. Real Time. Rula Jebreal across the desk. Maher: “Can you be gay in Gaza?” Jebreal: “Yes you can.” Maher: “And live?” Jebreal: “Absolutely you can.” Then the fight over Islam, media, apostasy… She: In your world I either say what you want… or I’m a bigot. She lists Sufi, Sunni, Shafi’i, Hanbali. Leaving the faith? “Maybe not in Gaza… But you can do it in Jordan. You can do it in Lebanon.” Maher’s closer: “African-Americans and Jews don’t belong to a religion that wanted to kill Salman Rushdie for writing a book.” Clipper slapped “LIAR!” on the screen. Face-warp artifacts mid-clip — processed footage. Watch the exchange. 🎥
- Sep 10, 2026266x their median
NYC sidewalk. Guy in a neon vest screaming at strangers: “DO SOMETHING… I DARE Y’ALL… Y’ALL NOT DOING SHIT.” There’s a baby in a stroller right there. He asked for a problem. Seconds later? He’s on his back on the grate. Someone hits him with: “You wanna get some too? … Fucking pussy.” Uploader caption: “CARZY BLM GUY ASKS FOR A PROBLEM AND GETS IT.” (No BLM shirt in the frame — just the vest and the attitude.) This is what “do something” looks like when the public finally does. Watch it. 🎥
- Sep 9, 2026261x their median
In 1948, MIT checked Maria Telkes' test house in Dover, Massachusetts. Outside: 11 degrees. Inside: 72. No gas line. No boiler. No monthly utility bill. Just salt. A wire. And chemistry the lithium industry still doesn't want you studying. This Part 1 calls it the "$8 salt jar battery" — sodium sulfate from the pool store, a bucket, nichrome, foil insulation — under $40 once, pitched as decades of winter heat storage while they sell you an $8k–$14k lithium pack that dies in ~7 years. Important: on the science, this is PHASE-CHANGE HEAT storage (BTUs), not a drop-in electrical Powerwall swap. But the history is real. The DOE paper they cite is real. The incentive problem is real. Watch Part 1. Then tell me why your "green" battery bill keeps climbing. 🎥
- Aug 26, 2026252x their median
THEY FINALLY BLOCKED ME!!!😝🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/XIyNmouR0M
- Sep 9, 2026178x their median
History is about to reset. In 1997, two historians mapped an 80-year pattern: Revolution. Civil War. World War II. Each cycle ends the same way — a hard reset. And right on schedule… we’re standing at the crisis again. Four turnings. Four types of people who decide what comes next. Your role depends on when you were born. This is Part 1 of “History Repeats. We’re at the Dangerous Part.” Watch it. Then tell me we’re not in the Fourth Turning. 🎥
- Sep 9, 202695x their median
xJUDGE STABS NEWSOM IN THE BACK! NOW Democrats Are SCREAMING for Military Control!” Creator’s claim: A federal judge sided with ICE… humiliated Gavin Newsom… and blue-state Dems are melting down. The setup he pitches: As ICE protests explode in LA and other blue cities, Newsom allegedly tried to BLOCK / RESTRICT federal troops, ICE agents, and the National Guard in California because a federal presence would “escalate tensions.” Meanwhile he says officers are catching Molotovs and frozen water bottles. Dems spent years bashing ICE. Now the same crowd wants troops in the streets? Watch this monologue. Then tell me who actually wanted law and order. 🎥
- Sep 27, 202651x their median
It took more than 40 seconds for someone to say, "Can you get your daughter?" A guy is sitting in a waiting room, minding his own business, phone out. The caption on the video says: "Why this lil girl come up and just hit me." The camera never actually shows a hit. What it does show is a tiny, fearless little girl who will NOT stop coming back over to him. She walks up, stares him down, waves her arms, walks off, and comes right back. Again. And again. He stays in his seat and keeps it together: "Don't." "No, no, no." "Go over there with your mother." Then he says it one more time: "Go over there with your mother." Nobody comes. Finally he turns and asks the question every stranger in every waiting room has wanted to ask: "Can you get your daughter?" Only then does a woman who appears to be Mom walk over and steer her away. Let's be clear: the kid isn't the problem. Little kids are little kids. They test limits, they explore, they don't know the rules yet. That's what parents are for. The problem is when Mom and Dad check out and leave a total stranger to do the parenting in a public room. Now, is this real or set up for the camera? I can't tell you. The post it came from is tagged as a paid partnership. But real or not, every one of us has been in that waiting room. So, honest answer: if a stranger's kid kept coming at you in public, would you speak up to the kid, go straight to the parent, or just sit there and take it? Tell me in the comments. Watch:
- Sep 27, 202647x their median
Can a squishy stress toy stop a bullet? 🤔 These guys set up blue NeeDoh Nice Cubes on a range table and worked their way up, one gun at a time. .22 out of a Ruger Mark IV: "The bullet went in like a centimeter." "It didn't make it far at all." 9mm out of a Glock 43X: "It's untouched." "It like basically stopped it, redirected it downwards." Next round, three cubes lined up: "The bullet just gets stuck right there." .44 Magnum: "It stopped right here in the front of number two." Then the Desert Eagle comes out… and it's slime everywhere. 🫠 Last up, the AR: "It veered up, came into the second, through the first one extremely fast." "It went clean through one." And that's only Part 1. Which result surprised you more: the 9mm getting redirected, or the AR only making it through one cube? Tell me in the comments. Watch:
- Sep 10, 202636x their median
Sen. Bernie Moreno just said to Fauci’s face what half the country has been thinking for years: “Who the fuck do you think you were for doing that?” COVID rules. “Idiotic politicians.” A mom arrested for watching a football game outside with her own family. Moreno: that story is why he sold his businesses and ran for the Senate. Six years later, sitting across from Fauci: “It is a total disgrace what you did to this country.” “50-plus-year legacy… ends in total and complete disgrace.” Then the ask: Will you apologize to the people you harmed? Do you have the dignity to just say you’re sorry? Fauci’s answer? “On the advice of counsel… Fifth Amendment.” No apology. Just the Fifth. Watch every second. 🎥
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 147K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 108 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 108 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 499x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #petesantilli, #truth, #cia.
- What is Pete Santilli 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🎙️'s engagement rate on X?
- Pete Santilli 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🎙️ (@petersantilli) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 108 original posts from the last 30 days against 146,614 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.025%, Pete Santilli 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🎙️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @petersantilli have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @petersantilli post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.93 posts per day across the measured window.