Back to @pedroneschling's profile

Pedro Neschling engagement report

@pedroneschling - 521K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 521K followers
Per impression
1.79%
5.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.01%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
94
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 521K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 1.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 243x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pedro Neschling's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Pedro Neschling sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 28, 2026243x their median

    Cortei o cabelo, meninas https://t.co/ueZFtbRoGw

    22K1735294328.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 202627x their median

    Não é que essa seleção da França é melhor do que o resto. Essa seleção da França é MUITO melhor do que o resto.

    2.4K112361555K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20269.4x their median

    Leonardo Jardim destruiu o futebol do Flamengo. Eu acho bizarro como um técnico consegue acabar com um time que jogava bem.

    7669323616K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.6x their median

    Partiu hoje uma das maiores atrizes do mundo. Laura Cardoso será eterna.

    78617209.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20264.9x their median

    Brasil mais uma vez eliminado por uma seleção europeia que está longe de ser das melhores de lá. Se a gente disputasse a eliminatória por lá, nem na Copa a gente chegava. Esse é nossa realidade. Desculpa se te zoei, Itália.

    432194123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.7x their median

    Partiu também a gigantesca Glória Menezes. A elegância em pessoa. Que dia…

    4358207.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20264.2x their median

    Neymar não tem a menor condição.

    377116121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.0x their median

    Indefensável o trabalho de Leonardo Jardim no Flamengo. E mais indefensável ainda a atitude de quem decidiu demitir Filipe Luís para contrata-lo da forma que aconteceu: Boto e Bap.

    2212427623K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20262.9x their median

    Quem não ama Copa do Mundo é maluco.

    246193013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.8x their median

    SEGUE O FLAMENGO APENAS PARA REAFIRMAR SEU GIGANTISMO

    1663102.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 521K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 1.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 243x its own typical post.

What is Pedro Neschling's engagement rate on X?
Pedro Neschling (@pedroneschling) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 521,434 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Pedro Neschling sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pedroneschling have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pedroneschling post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going