Back to @pedrocertezas's profile

Pedro Certezas engagement report

@pedrocertezas - 679K followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.353%
of 679K followers
Per impression
3.01%
80K views on a typical post
Reach
11.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
36 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.77/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 679K followers, an engagement rate of 0.353%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 80K times each, and 3.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 89K interactions, about 37x its own typical post.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #certovas.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pedro Certezas's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.353%, Pedro Certezas sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video57% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 193 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 202037x their median

    Uma coisa que me pega demais demais é que em 11/09 de 2001 eu fui liberado da escola na hora dos atentados. Teve um ataque terrorista em NOVA YORK e, por segurança, uma escola em MACAÉ achou melhor mandar os alunos pra casa. Claramente era a próxima cidade da lista da Al-Qaeda.

    80K7.0K5651.6KView on X
  • Nov 9, 201828x their median

    Há um tempo comecei a fazer uma das minhas mongolices prediletas da vida: contar mentiras para motoristas e postar nos stories. HAHAHAHAH! . Essas foram as 10 primeiras. Aproveitem tanto quanto eu aproveitei. VIDAAAAAA! https://t.co/dubSgpxg1O

    55K7.4K1.6K3.5KView on X
  • Sep 8, 202614x their median

    Repórter: “O atual ganhador da bola de ouro não te colocou no top3 da temporada” Lamine Yamal: “Quem?” Repórter: “Dembele” Lamine Yamal: “Bem.. é amigo do Kylian, né…?” Gosto disso. https://t.co/C8vXcFEKFP

    33K9201765452.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    Julian Alvarez queria sair pro Barcelona porém o Atletico de Madrid não quis vender Só de raiva ativou o modo Olise: Vou lá, faço o meu, vou embora kkkkkkkk https://t.co/wTJdWjMcPD

    26K55589911.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20269.9x their median

    uma das pessoas mais legais, gentis, espirituosas e maneiras com quem já gravei na vida nos conhecemos pessoalmente nesse dia da gravação, mas, pelo seu jeito, parecia que já era um grande amigo. absoluta unanimidade de ser humano, nunca vi ninguém falar médio do Lito, quem dirá mal. que tristeza isso tudo. que merda. hoje definitivamente o mundo fica um pouco pior.

    23K5092716237K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.7x their median

    🚨🟡🔴 AS Roma are in direct club to club contact with Zenit St Petersburg to sign Luiz Henrique as new winger. Roma have been offered the Brazilian winger and now asking for deal conditions with talks ongoing. https://t.co/WPSKKdd6HN

    17K7432814442.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.9x their median

    Veja: Arrasca recebendo o Plata de volta ao Flamengo rsrs 🎥 ig: gelmo_ia https://t.co/PayNvopqkk

    15K1.1K1251861.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20266.3x their median

    o que o corintiano tá vivendo é aquela noite em que, do momento em que o pênalti é isolado até 7h da manhã do dia seguinte você não fala uma palavra o famigerado silêncio reflexivo pós-catástrofe futebolística

    14K71211292177K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.3x their median

    insalubre o número de pessoas me mandando essa foto da Clarice Falcão criança falando que se parece comigo https://t.co/1p6D5g8FIr

    15K13820044212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.0x their median

    simplesmente Marcelo falando que não vê gratidão pelo que ele fez na Seleção. Bonito de se ver. Entrevista dos monstros do Pod Boa https://t.co/dcVF8XqLTT

    13K846457145695K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#certovas

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 679K followers, an engagement rate of 0.353%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 80K times each, and 3.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 89K interactions, about 37x its own typical post.

What is Pedro Certezas's engagement rate on X?
Pedro Certezas (@pedrocertezas) has an engagement rate of 0.353%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 679,345 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.353%, Pedro Certezas sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pedrocertezas have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pedrocertezas post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going