H. Pearl Davis engagement report
@pearlythingz - 478K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 433 interactions against 478K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
H. Pearl Davis's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.091%, H. Pearl Davis sits above the 25th percentile of the 206,113 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.68% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 36% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 9% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 123 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 202632x their median
Women gained all of the new jobs since January 2025. https://t.co/djY1wOfV4J
- Aug 28, 202626x their median
Mom shot 11-month-old son in the face so dad could never have custody: 'Worth it' https://t.co/NKG2qJE7UD https://t.co/t3Xoe41L7F
- Aug 24, 202625x their median
since you are here please donate to my divorce documentary I will do everything in my power to stop these women! https://t.co/hQQjbFMvQt https://t.co/cx4mRcXXUL
- Oct 23, 202614x their median
Dillon Danis gets EMOTIONAL discussing his three-year legal battle with Logan Paul and Nina Agdal, saying he’s been fighting to avoid going BANKRUPT 😳 https://t.co/2x02BtcLEs
- Sep 6, 202612x their median
The one person who cared about the kids. He’s a HERO! https://t.co/KC1YEewuI7
- Sep 6, 202611x their median
The world would be a better place if men could slap their wives every now and then
- Aug 14, 202610x their median
Price gouging https://t.co/RFMTtx0q3K
- Sep 18, 202610.0x their median
Women pretend to be useless so they don’t have to do anything
- Sep 5, 20264.9x their median
I have one thought regarding Lindsay Clancy. If this woman truly had a brief moment of psychosis, all due to her postpartum depression, it was so bad that millions of women have rallied to “support her”. The problem is, any mother I know, if they had come out of psychosis and murdered their children, would’ve pled guilty and gone straight to prison out of absolute heartbreak and guilt. But, instead, she has an overzealous defense attorney who was furious that a single man saw through her bullshit. Also — the prosecution when this case is retried better have 12 men or they didn’t do their job.
- Aug 26, 20264.6x their median
We need to get education around old fat hag wife depression https://t.co/Bdoq4MHX3R
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 433 interactions against 478K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.
- What is H. Pearl Davis's engagement rate on X?
- H. Pearl Davis (@pearlythingz) has an engagement rate of 0.091%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 478,001 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.091%, H. Pearl Davis sits above the 25th percentile of the 206,113 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @pearlythingz have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @pearlythingz post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.