H. Pearl Davis engagement report
@pearlythingz - 474K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 474K followers, an engagement rate of 0.268%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 3.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
H. Pearl Davis's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.268%, H. Pearl Davis sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,037 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.435% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 73K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 79K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 87K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 96K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 102K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 99K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 92K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 233K |
| Monday | 0% | 292K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 284K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 253K |
| Thursday | -2% | 246K |
| Friday | -3% | 255K |
| Saturday | +3% | 229K |
Best tweets
- Aug 24, 20266.4x their median
since you are here please donate to my divorce documentary I will do everything in my power to stop these women! https://t.co/hQQjbFMvQt https://t.co/cx4mRcXXUL
- Aug 28, 20263.9x their median
Mom shot 11-month-old son in the face so dad could never have custody: 'Worth it' https://t.co/NKG2qJE7UD https://t.co/t3Xoe41L7F
- Aug 14, 20263.5x their median
Price gouging https://t.co/RFMTtx0q3K
- Aug 26, 20261.6x their median
We need to get education around old fat hag wife depression https://t.co/Bdoq4MHX3R
- Aug 26, 2026
I would rather be a slave on a plantation than work for a woman https://t.co/IbHSFSVX0V
- Aug 27, 2026
Today I did a undercover marriage counseling session and learned that me cheating is just a bump in the road and now he has to spend more time w me as a way to fix the marriage I love marriage!!!
- Aug 24, 2026
Elijah only fucked Sarah stock cause his hormones made him do it he’s innocent guys
- Aug 25, 2026
I rewrote when I was your man Bruno mars https://t.co/PMPB7huvfU
- Aug 24, 2026
In the second clip I’m sharing from @pearlythingz’s interview with Jason Evert, she asks the male Lila Rose the million dollar question: should Christian women obey their husbands? Jason claims that women are required to submit to their husbands but not obey them, because it’s a totally different word in the Greek or whatever. So, in Jason’s mind, a wife can be in perfect submission to her husband while actively disobeying him. Then, Jason goes down the road of, the wife will submit as long as her husband is loving her the way Christ loves the church. So, submission is conditional on the husband’s performance. And finally, if the wife still won’t submit to a good man, it’s because she’s a victim of her upbringing. So there you have it: zero obedience, zero obligations, zero accountability. Link: https://t.co/2YuRenHGsh
- Aug 25, 2026
We Love You White Ninjas! https://t.co/ucmFruOgLA
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 474K followers, an engagement rate of 0.268%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 3.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.
- What is H. Pearl Davis's engagement rate on X?
- H. Pearl Davis (@pearlythingz) has an engagement rate of 0.268%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 473,751 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.268%, H. Pearl Davis sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,037 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @pearlythingz have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @pearlythingz post?
- Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.