Back to @peaq's profile

peaq engagement report

@peaq - 318K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.152%
of 318K followers
Per impression
1.93%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
7.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
486
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 486 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.152%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 725 interactions.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

peaq's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.152%, peaq sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 291 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 2026

    The first borrowing and lending market for $PEAQ is now live on @solana via Offerbook on @JupiterExchange. $PEAQ holders can use their tokens as collateral to access USDC through fixed-term P2P loans, without price-based liquidations. https://t.co/qlSuPI8L5s https://t.co/fgWohIq4Jc

    578105301246K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Loading ... ███████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ https://t.co/QhUm5ltF5l

    555824025124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    https://t.co/EFW6TxrmRn

    54374251235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    2,000,000+ machines activated → 15,000,000 $PEAQ bonded to run them → 0.59% of the supply taken out of circulation 🔗 https://t.co/kEaGLuYsHD https://t.co/E4Phla8I1p

    5199819735K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Introducing the peaq Economics page Everything about $PEAQ economics, in one place. → what drives demand for $PEAQ → how fees and newly minted $PEAQ get distributed → how supply changes over time → where the treasury sits, and every machine bond onchain Explore: https://t.co/po3ABrxBcn

    50697231233K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    Robots and machines can now prove they're real Introducing peaqOS Verify, the sixth function of peaqOS → The machine's secure chip signs a challenge and peaqOS checks it against the manufacturer's certificate chain → peaq verifies the business operating the machine → Both anchored to the machine's onchain identity, readable by anyone, on whichever chain the machine calls home The foundation every other function rests on peaqOS Verify is live

    48874171331K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    Robots should take your order, not your data peaq and @worldnetwork are co-hosting an afternoon at Korea Blockchain Week (@kbwofficial) One walk, two stops: prove you're human, then meet a machine that can earn for you 30 Sept · 14:00–17:00 KST · Seongsu, Seoul Free entry, approval required: https://t.co/jyPcYmiZOb

    4406718121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    NVIDIA. Universal Robots. NEURA Robotics. Doosan. peaq. Eight challenges. 80+ builders. Six days in Munich. robo.innovate Hackathon 2026 October 23–28 https://t.co/iakQEBzFCb

    41264271331K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    peaq × @worldnetwork in Seoul 🇰🇷 Robots should take your order, not your data That’s exactly what they’ll do at our robo-café – World Orb on hand At @kbwofficial? Come check it out Details ↓ https://t.co/OPgcputA3Z

    4195925332K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    NOW in Seongsu 🇰🇷 @worldnetwork x peaq pop-up is live Pull up ↓ https://t.co/I8QJI2FWVr

    4324616418K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 486 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.152%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 725 interactions.

What is peaq's engagement rate on X?
peaq (@peaq) has an engagement rate of 0.152%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 318,353 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.152%, peaq sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @peaq have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @peaq post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going