Back to @paulazanelli's profile

Paula Zanelli engagement report

@paulazanelli - 81K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.049%
of 81K followers
Per impression
4.38%
891 views on a typical post
Reach
1.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
39
interactions (median)
Saved
0.337%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 81K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 891 times each, and 4.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 1904x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tag: #flavio22.

Compared with accounts its own size

Paula Zanelli's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.049%, Paula Zanelli sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 329 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 4, 20181904x their median

    Uau!!! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 https://t.co/kEubE1oYEH

    49K21K7083.8KView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026891x their median

    Volta a circular nas redes um vídeo de 2022 onde Lula repudiava os MEI’s https://t.co/ESVLdDkWzw

    24K10K280326251K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026376x their median

    A mudança que está em andamento vai transformar as próximas gerações. Lula e o PT serão apenas um passado que o nosso país faz questão de esquecer. E quem vai fazer essa mudança é cada um de vocês que acredita nesse país e no futuro. O Brasil vai vencer! Vote 2️⃣2️⃣🇧🇷 #FlavioBolsonaro #Vote22 #mudaja #AcordaBrasil

    11K3.1K2365996K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026294x their median

    LULA VAI PERDER A ELEIÇÃO! Mais um vídeo da série de vídeos que vão eleger Flávio Bolsonaro dentro do Supermercado. Não há no Brasil uma pessoa que não saia do Supermercado com raiva do Lula! EM OUTUBRO, É FORA LULA! ❌️ https://t.co/MponMb43nz

    8.5K2.8K13969260K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026143x their median

    A Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil – Seccional Distrito Federal (OAB-DF) determinou a abertura de um processo ético-disciplinar contra um escritório de advocacia e seus seis sócios: Juliana Barcellos, Alexandre Barcellos de Moraes, Viviane Barcellos de Moraes, Ana Clara Constante de Moraes e Fernando Augusto Valentini Fritoli. A decisão toma como base fatos apontados em relatório da Polícia Federal. Segundo a presidência do órgão, a medida visa zelar pela regularidade, ética e respeitabilidade da advocacia, assegurando a apuração rigorosa dos fatos junto aos órgãos competentes. 📺 Confira na JP News 📌 Siga o nosso perfil @JovemPanNews #JovemPanNews#OABDF #Advocacia #Direito #Justica

    4.4K9371397297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026121x their median

    Que cabaré, bicho! https://t.co/nClpT7IC3B

    3.4K1.3K493723K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202699x their median

    🚨 VOCÊS VÃO PERDER PARA O JANONES?? NÃO É POSSÍVEL! FOGE NÃO, LULA! COMENTEM MUITO AQUI 👇 https://t.co/5MiVL9imof

    2.3K5978978419K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202693x their median

    A 12 dias das eleições, Lula anuncia "pé-de-meia" para universitários https://t.co/a7uFmzTt2C

    2.3K237834272356K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202621x their median

    Ministro dos STF Andrei Mendonça determina afastamento preventivo de diretor da PF. O ministro André Mendonça, do STF (Supremo Tribunal Federal), determinou nesta terça-feira (8) o afastamento preventivo do diretor-geral da PF (Polícia Federal), Andrei Rodrigues, e do delegado Leandro Almada do cargo de diretor de Inteligência Policial da PF. Segundo Mendonça, os relatórios revelam um "monitoramento sistemático e ilegal", realizado por mais de 30 dias, sobre sua atuação e a de outras autoridades, entre elas  o advogado-geral da União, Jorge Messias. De acordo com a decisão, Moraes teria tido “notícias da existência” dos relatórios antes de sua utilização e eles teriam sido empregados em uma tentativa de incluir Mendonça no "Inquérito das Fake News". Mendonça pediu a realização de uma sessão virtual ainda nesta terça-feira (8) para que a Segunda Turma do STF analise se referendam ou não a decisão do ministro. A turma é composta por Luiz Fux, Gilmar Mendes, Kassio Nunes Marques e Dias Toffoli.

    73159110148K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.0x their median

    A verdade é para quem tem a coragem de dizê-la https://t.co/k0TMiMldGe

    199107252.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#flavio22

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 81K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 891 times each, and 4.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 1904x its own typical post.

What is Paula Zanelli's engagement rate on X?
Paula Zanelli (@paulazanelli) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 80,830 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.049%, Paula Zanelli sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @paulazanelli have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @paulazanelli post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going