Pau Garcia-Milà engagement report
@pau - 75K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 75K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 189x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #en1minuto, #ia, #tdah.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026. Recurring tags: #en1minuto, #ia, #tdah.
Compared with accounts its own size
Pau Garcia-Milà's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.021%, Pau Garcia-Milà sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 94% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 270 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 22, 2026189x their median
Mirad esto. Muy fuerte. La inteligencia artificial de Google, la misma pregunta cambiando el origen. https://t.co/GV9UPLpKFt
- Aug 9, 202641x their median
Acabo de pedirle a la IA (Fable 5) que me diga algo que me asuste y me ha dicho esto. La "irrelevancia cómoda". https://t.co/UHaRmIo9c9
- Sep 19, 202634x their median
La IA más potente no siempre tiene que estar en la nube. Con Rebost puedes instalar modelos de IA directamente en tu ordenador y trabajar con tus propios archivos sin que salgan de ahí. Gratis, open source y hasta sin conexión. Te lo cuento en 1 minuto ⤵️ #en1minuto #IA https://t.co/N9FWGlXyRP
- Aug 10, 202614x their median
El prompt engineering ha muerto. Hoy la IA funciona mejor cuando le hablas sin filtro, no cuando le escribes un prompt perfecto. Te lo cuento en 1 minuto ⤵️ #IA #en1minuto https://t.co/Mfw4u9nqnE
- Jul 18, 202613x their median
Hay una herramienta que, mientras compras online, busca si eso mismo está más barato en otro lado. Así dejas de preguntarte si podrías haber pagado menos. Te lo cuento en 1 minuto ⤵️ #IA #en1minuto https://t.co/y3OsDsuawr
- Sep 5, 20269.2x their median
Después de probar gpt-6 Astra en diferentes entornos y contextos, creo que lo que marca principalmente la diferencia es que noto que es el primer modelo de IA en tener sentido común: en tareas de desarrollo, evita añadir capas adicionales si se da cuenta que existe algo similar a lo que le has pedido aunque no igual que se podría reaprovechar. Un humano (desarrollador) vería esa librería / helper / servicio y lo usaría directamente, comentando internamente que reusa ese componente aunque no cumple exactamente con la especificación, la diferencia es mínima y documentable. En cambio un modelo de IA (excepto Astra), justamente ahí es donde suele equivocarse y tradicionalmente añadiría una nueva capa de basura para crear exactamente la especificación documentada, sin ser consciente de que está duplicando más y más código. Lo que vendría a ser el Sentido Común® del que muchos humanos (y casi todas las IAs) carecen. En resumen. Piel de gallina con Astra, de momento.
- Oct 19, 20268.7x their median
Siempre había querido un videojuego de castellers. Así que se lo pedí a la IA y me fui a dormir. Al despertarme, tenía un juego completo. Esto es el one-shot: pedirle algo a la IA y ver hasta dónde llega sin tocar nada. Te lo cuento en un minuto. #en1minuto #IA https://t.co/46B9LaeXzR
- Jul 20, 20267.5x their median
Hay una herramienta que analiza tu piel con solo una foto. Se llama Skinive y detecta cuándo de verdad hace falta ir al médico o cuando es algo que puedas solucionar en casa. Esto viene muy bien a hipocondríacos como yo. Te lo cuento en 1 minuto ⤵️ #en1minuto #IA https://t.co/dGO7f4GMeu
- Sep 14, 20266.9x their median
Hay juegos que entretienen y luego está este. Murdoku mezcla Sudoku con True Crime y es peligrosamente adictivo. Esta es gratis y aquí te dejo la URL: https://t.co/lgdj8Ew0vy Te lo cuento en 1 minuto ⤵️ #en1minuto #juego https://t.co/Eyebt4XBLR
- Jul 27, 20265.9x their median
Hay una app que avisa de que has llegado bien sin compartir la ubicación 24h. BackHome no comparte tu ubicación con nadie, nunca. Pero cuando llegas a donde tú has decidido, avisa sola a quien quieras. Sin tocar el móvil. Te lo cuento en 1 minuto ⤵️ #en1minuto #Gadget https://t.co/Bem2szFqtC
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 75K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 189x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #en1minuto, #ia, #tdah.
- What is Pau Garcia-Milà's engagement rate on X?
- Pau Garcia-Milà (@pau) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 75,284 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.021%, Pau Garcia-Milà sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @pau have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @pau post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.