Back to @pattistanger's profile

Patti Stanger engagement report

@pattistanger - 367K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.397%
of 367K followers
Per impression
5.59%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
7.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.075%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.397%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 5.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Patti Stanger's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.397%, Patti Stanger sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video32% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 32% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 297 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 202697x their median

    🚨BREAKING: Chinese national who organises pro-Palestine rallies at UCLA, Liu Lijun, has just had her visa revoked The Trump admin isn’t playing about. https://t.co/Hvaw0hgvum

    124K14K2.3K6062.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202686x their median

    Friendly reminder: if you’re the Governor of New York and you’re wrapping a hijab around your head to pander to Muslim men two weeks before the 25th anniversary of 9/11, you’re the biggest piece of shit.

    108K15K1.1K490842K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202628x their median

    🚨 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: A statue of Charlie Kirk was unveiled in Times Square today at 2:23 PM, the exact time Kirk was murdered on this day last year. This statue is a masterpiece!! Charlie Kirk’s legacy will live on forever. ❤️🇺🇸 https://t.co/FDw1sd6ul8

    34K5.8K607155222K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202613x their median

    🚨RADICAL LEFTIST ALAN RITCHSON, WHO HAS MADE IT HIS MISSION IN LIFE TO SPREAD LIES ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP, WAS JUST INFORMED BY HIS EMPLOYERS AT PARAMOUNT THAT POLITICAL POSTING ON SOCIAL MEDIA IS EXPLICITLY FORBIDDEN BY HIS CONTRACT! Follow @RedLivesMatterQ Ritchson is the lead in the show “Reacher,” which has been lagging in ratings since he began his assault on democracy. Paramount Talent Coordinator Jon Raebro says there doesn’t seem to be an interest in renewing the show for a fifth season. “Mr. Ritchson seems determined to end his own career.” Share this everywhere so the fifth season stays unrenewed! Follow @mcafeenew for more drops.

    13K4.2K1.5K306441K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202613x their median

    🚨BREAKING: President Trump has announced that George Soros and his entire network will be investigated under RICO charges. FOLLOW @StephenNesaraG https://t.co/Lwbcyw6bBV

    15K2.6K650131264K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20268.9x their median

    Congratulations Zach Bryan, most of your fans now know you are a douche bag! How to end a career in 3,2,1….. I predict your future concert and album sales are going to plummet!

    11K743831381.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20268.7x their median

    Two weeks ago, it was revealed that Palestinian men are mass-raping young girls in Gaza. Ms. Rachel hasn’t said a word. Weird.

    11K1.1K2342693K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20268.4x their median

    🚨🚨 BREAKING: THE FBI HAS JUST RAIDED THE OFFICES OF TOP MEMBERS OF MINNESOTA GOVERNOR TIM WALZ’S ADMINISTRATION RELATED TO THE OVER $9 BILLION THEFT OF TAXPAYER FUNDS THAT OCCURRED IN THE STATE UNDER WALZ’S WATCH AND DIRECTION. The feds are said to be building a case on Tim Walz himself, who was “on the take” and took MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in bribes and kickbacks from Somalians and others in what is being called one of the worst state government scandals and theft of taxpayer funds in US history. The WALLS ARE QUITE LITERALLY CLOSING IN ON WALZ, with his arrest, inevitable ouster from office whether it be resignation or impeachment and criminal prosecution said to be “imminent”. Tampon Tim will go down as one of the most corrupt Governors in the history of our country… The damage he has done to the state of Minnesota is immeasurable with his influx of violent Somalian thugs to terrorize and replace Americans in order to steal elections and his MASSIVE CONSPIRACY to work with them to rob the people of his state of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS of their hard-earned money. It’s no wonder that Kamala Harris picked him to be her VP choice… Crooks of a feather flock together. The jig is up and justice is coming for this Democrat clown… ARREST TIM WALZ NOW!

    8.6K3.1K448147102K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20267.6x their median

    Ladies and gentlemen... Watch this now. https://t.co/FRQ2zg5XUG

    8.4K2.3K167196838K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20267.4x their median

    I truly believe that September 11 should be a National Day of Remembrance No school. No work. No business as usual. Just one day for our country to pause, remember the lives that were lost, honor the heroes and first responders, and reflect 🙏♥️ What do you think?

    9.2K1.0K4809296K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.397%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 5.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.

What is Patti Stanger's engagement rate on X?
Patti Stanger (@pattistanger) has an engagement rate of 0.397%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 366,553 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.397%, Patti Stanger sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pattistanger have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pattistanger post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going