Patti Stanger engagement report
@pattistanger - 367K followers on X
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.397%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 5.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Patti Stanger's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.397%, Patti Stanger sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 32% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 11% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 32% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 297 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 11, 202697x their median
🚨BREAKING: Chinese national who organises pro-Palestine rallies at UCLA, Liu Lijun, has just had her visa revoked The Trump admin isn’t playing about. https://t.co/Hvaw0hgvum
- Aug 30, 202686x their median
Friendly reminder: if you’re the Governor of New York and you’re wrapping a hijab around your head to pander to Muslim men two weeks before the 25th anniversary of 9/11, you’re the biggest piece of shit.
- Sep 10, 202628x their median
🚨 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: A statue of Charlie Kirk was unveiled in Times Square today at 2:23 PM, the exact time Kirk was murdered on this day last year. This statue is a masterpiece!! Charlie Kirk’s legacy will live on forever. ❤️🇺🇸 https://t.co/FDw1sd6ul8
- Sep 11, 202613x their median
🚨RADICAL LEFTIST ALAN RITCHSON, WHO HAS MADE IT HIS MISSION IN LIFE TO SPREAD LIES ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP, WAS JUST INFORMED BY HIS EMPLOYERS AT PARAMOUNT THAT POLITICAL POSTING ON SOCIAL MEDIA IS EXPLICITLY FORBIDDEN BY HIS CONTRACT! Follow @RedLivesMatterQ Ritchson is the lead in the show “Reacher,” which has been lagging in ratings since he began his assault on democracy. Paramount Talent Coordinator Jon Raebro says there doesn’t seem to be an interest in renewing the show for a fifth season. “Mr. Ritchson seems determined to end his own career.” Share this everywhere so the fifth season stays unrenewed! Follow @mcafeenew for more drops.
- Oct 3, 202613x their median
🚨BREAKING: President Trump has announced that George Soros and his entire network will be investigated under RICO charges. FOLLOW @StephenNesaraG https://t.co/Lwbcyw6bBV
- Oct 3, 20268.9x their median
Congratulations Zach Bryan, most of your fans now know you are a douche bag! How to end a career in 3,2,1….. I predict your future concert and album sales are going to plummet!
- Oct 2, 20268.7x their median
Two weeks ago, it was revealed that Palestinian men are mass-raping young girls in Gaza. Ms. Rachel hasn’t said a word. Weird.
- Sep 10, 20268.4x their median
🚨🚨 BREAKING: THE FBI HAS JUST RAIDED THE OFFICES OF TOP MEMBERS OF MINNESOTA GOVERNOR TIM WALZ’S ADMINISTRATION RELATED TO THE OVER $9 BILLION THEFT OF TAXPAYER FUNDS THAT OCCURRED IN THE STATE UNDER WALZ’S WATCH AND DIRECTION. The feds are said to be building a case on Tim Walz himself, who was “on the take” and took MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in bribes and kickbacks from Somalians and others in what is being called one of the worst state government scandals and theft of taxpayer funds in US history. The WALLS ARE QUITE LITERALLY CLOSING IN ON WALZ, with his arrest, inevitable ouster from office whether it be resignation or impeachment and criminal prosecution said to be “imminent”. Tampon Tim will go down as one of the most corrupt Governors in the history of our country… The damage he has done to the state of Minnesota is immeasurable with his influx of violent Somalian thugs to terrorize and replace Americans in order to steal elections and his MASSIVE CONSPIRACY to work with them to rob the people of his state of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS of their hard-earned money. It’s no wonder that Kamala Harris picked him to be her VP choice… Crooks of a feather flock together. The jig is up and justice is coming for this Democrat clown… ARREST TIM WALZ NOW!
- Sep 12, 20267.6x their median
Ladies and gentlemen... Watch this now. https://t.co/FRQ2zg5XUG
- Sep 10, 20267.4x their median
I truly believe that September 11 should be a National Day of Remembrance No school. No work. No business as usual. Just one day for our country to pause, remember the lives that were lost, honor the heroes and first responders, and reflect 🙏♥️ What do you think?
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 367K followers, an engagement rate of 0.397%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 5.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.
- What is Patti Stanger's engagement rate on X?
- Patti Stanger (@pattistanger) has an engagement rate of 0.397%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 366,553 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.397%, Patti Stanger sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @pattistanger have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @pattistanger post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.