Patrick Lencioni engagement report
@patricklencioni - 62K followers on X
Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 62K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0.791% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 128 interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.026%, Patrick Lencioni sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 83% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 67% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 67% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 398 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 25, 20268.0x their median
One of the biggest mistakes managers make is one I've made many times myself. We see one of our people doing something wrong, and we don't call it out. It's uncomfortable, so we wimp out and tell others close to us instead. The pressure builds, and eventually we lose it on them, ding them in a review out of left field, or let them go. All of it feels unfair, because it is. They never knew. Letting people know when something needs to change is one of a leader's biggest responsibilities, and it gives the other person much dignity. There is no better way to handle it.
- May 8, 20266.9x their median
A team that never argues isn't aligned. It's avoiding the topics that really matter. The healthiest teams I've worked with debate hard, then leave the room on the same page. Not because they had to agree, but because they trusted each other enough to actually disagree. https://t.co/FK3vu2fGmE
- Apr 29, 20266.3x their median
Most people shouldn't be leaders. Not because they aren't capable — because they're chasing the wrong things. Real leadership is responsibility. Sacrifice. Suffering for others. The question is not "should I be a leader?" It's "how much am I willing to suffer for others?" https://t.co/mpYrGX0AKL
- May 1, 20265.6x their median
The term "servant leadership" implies there is another kind of leadership. There isn't. Every leader has to be a servant for the people they lead. Drop the qualifier. Just call it leadership. https://t.co/cXZlQ20n6V
- May 4, 20265.5x their median
There are a lot of ways to build a team. But there are really only five ways to destroy one. A lack of trust. A fear of conflict. No real commitment. The unwillingness to hold each other accountable. And an inattention to collective results. Get those five right, and almost everything else takes care of itself. If your team is feeling stuck, this is where you should start. Check out my book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team to learn more.
- Sep 12, 20265.1x their median
Twenty-five years ago today I finished writing my book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, mere hours after the tragedy that we now call 9/11. I thought it might be a good idea to republish the short commentary I included at the end of that book that day, which was a tribute to the teamwork that brought ordinary people to do extraordinary things to save the lives of strangers, even at the expense of their own lives. May God bless those brave men and women, and may He bless their families.
- May 15, 20264.5x their median
One of the most underrated forces in team culture is peer pressure. I know, the phrase has some baggage. But on a healthy team, it's one of the most powerful tools you have. Teammates notice each other's work, they cheer for each other, and they care enough to say, "I know you can do better." If you want to go deeper into this, I'd encourage you to pick up The Five Dysfunctions of a Team.
- Sep 2, 20263.6x their median
Team #1. The team you're on comes before the team you lead. Get that order right and everything below it gets healthier. More in The Advantage: https://t.co/vG0PVqNlKv https://t.co/QHR7WglS61
- May 18, 20263.3x their median
Recently, someone challenged me to explain every book I've written. 14 of them (and counting)... By the grace of God, these resources have reached millions of people. And the need for organizational health is just as real today as it was on day one. If you have read any of my books, do you have a favorite? (or least favorite?)
- Aug 11, 20263.2x their median
Most teams have one meeting for everything. That's why they hate meetings. These are the different meetings you should be having: The daily check-in. The weekly tactical. The ad hoc strategic. The quarterly offsite. This is the way to be effective and avoid having a meeting stew. If you want to learn how to run these meetings. Checkout Death by Meeting: https://t.co/gLfzRMe5ay
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 62K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 0.791% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 128 interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Patrick Lencioni's engagement rate on X?
- Patrick Lencioni (@patricklencioni) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 62,401 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.026%, Patrick Lencioni sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @patricklencioni have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @patricklencioni post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.