Patricia Marins engagement report
@pati_marins64 - 401K followers on X
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 401K followers, an engagement rate of 0.292%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 28% are part of a thread and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #g1.
Compared with accounts its own size
Patricia Marins's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.292%, Patricia Marins sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 156.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Aug 22, 20267.1x their median
https://t.co/WsBSH8KUvn
- Aug 12, 20264.9x their median
Never has a president subjected the US to such global humiliation On February 28, Trump and Netanyahu ordered an attack on Iran which, in their assessment, would be swift and triumphant. What we witnessed was the exact opposite: a war against a resilient adversary that ended up exhausting several stockpiles of American weapons in just 40 days of combat. The lack of long-term planning was evident from day one. Days ago, the WSJ reported that Iran carried out more than 2,000 attacks using ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and high-precision aerial drones against targets in the Gulf. The offensive managed to strike and severely damage at least 20 American military installations spread across 8 countries in the region, causing damages of at least 13 billion dollars. Military bases became uninhabitable in the face of the Iranian onslaught, while the world felt the impact of Trump and Netanyahu’s war. A truce was then negotiated and put into effect, but Iran never accepted the terms for the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and this situation persists to this day. I wrote some time ago that the cost of the war, added to aerial operations, defensive and offensive ammunition, damage to bases, and aircraft losses, already exceeded 120 billion dollars. If we add the material damages and economic losses of the Gulf countries, we will have a total figure in the range of 300 billion, not counting other global losses. A defeat that Trump cannot change, even if he repeats the word victory every night on his social network. It was a war where all allies refused to get involved, an isolation felt even by remote countries that typically showed automatic alignment. Internally, there was a change of command and clear signs of excessive politicization. But such an embarrassment did not stop there. It has now come to light that President Donald Trump carried out a top-secret plane-swapping operation, using a food truck as a disguise due to a threat of an attack from Iran. The highly unusual maneuver took place in Ankara, Turkey, right after the NATO summit, but the details of the farce were revealed by the American press and confirmed by Trump himself. Imagine the president of the United States of America hiding in a little food truck… What a situation these people got themselves into! Read More: https://t.co/PeVPdicTmN
- Aug 7, 20264.2x their median
The Saudis sign a trilateral security agreement with Pakistan and Turkey. There is no other image that more clearly symbolizes Trump’s failure than the Gulf states seeking regional security arrangements. https://t.co/duAUiuYBte
- Aug 18, 20263.4x their median
Sometimes people think I exaggerate in my criticisms of the Trump administration. But… just a few weeks ago his son-in-law Jared Kushner was going around the GCC with his hand out. Now Trump is appointing him as the envoy and negotiator with Hamas. This is a complete slap in the face to career American diplomacy, and an incomprehensible joke. One thing is making money as a family. Another is inserting the family into extremely complex, decades-old problems that demand real seriousness.
- Aug 5, 20263.3x their median
War: India Sent More Than 3,000 Weapon Shipments to Israel A report by Amnesty International, confirmed by the Indian government, shows that Israel received 2,596 confirmed shipments of weapons between October 2023 and November 2025. These transfers did not stop there. As the organization has confirmed that exports and joint supply chains remain active in 2026, even after repeated international warnings, I dare to state that the total number of shipments, including those conducted in secrecy and those from 2026, exceeds 3,000. This places India’s military industry as an active participant in the devastation of Gaza, alongside those of the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and other European countries. In June and July 2026, Amnesty International sent official notifications to the Indian state and to nine companies involved, demanding explanations. No response was received from the authorities by the time the document was published. Meanwhile, the partnership between India and Israel continues to consolidate. In June 2026, senior officials from Israel’s Ministry of Defense made official visits to India to align regional security interests and strengthen industrial ties. Indian companies operate in partnership with Israeli defense giants such as Elbit Systems, producing armaments under the Made in India policy. Cheap Indian labor is precisely what these corporations seek. But the exports were not carried out solely by Israeli companies operating in India; they directly involved the Indian government and public-sector companies. There were direct shipments of weapons manufactured by enterprises owned by the Indian state itself and controlled by the Ministry of Defense, such as MIL and Yantra. Even when production is carried out by an Israeli company operating inside the country, these weapons cannot leave India without explicit approval from the government in New Delhi. India’s Ministry of Commerce and its customs authorities had to issue specific military export licenses for each of the shipments sent throughout the conflict. The Indian government has stated that the country maintains a robust export-control mechanism and that all military transactions comply with international obligations and laws. However, there is no dispute over legality here, the core issue is the morality of the act itself. New Delhi is deepening ties with the Israeli defense industry, which already accounts for 15% of the country’s arms imports. Read more: https://t.co/R8P7eOIcvh
- Aug 27, 20263.1x their median
“CIA Director Ratcliffe traveled unannounced to Moscow to warn Russian officials against attacking NATO members and providing military aid to Iran, US media reports.” You don’t make a surprise, desperate trip to a country you’re imposing sanctions on unless it’s to ask for something. It only takes two brain cells to see that this kind of visit is to ask for something, not to make threats. And curiously, after the CIA director’s visit, Russia has announced that President Pezeshkian and Putin are set to meet next week in Kyrgyzstan, on the sidelines of the SCO summit. There are no coincidences in this field. Just as there is no chance that the Iranian president will carry a message from the Russians capable of changing anything. The truth is that the Russians did very little for Iran in the war. Incredibly, Iran fought almost entirely with a national industry and rare allies, which today makes it hard to apply pressure for an end to the state of war. https://t.co/P6RN2eyQzB
- Jul 25, 20262.9x their median
Houthis launch missile salvo against Saudi oil facilities Saudi Arabia struck a Yemeni port area yesterday. The outcome was entirely predictable: Houthi forces responded not with a single missile, but with a salvo of at least five ballistic missiles against the Aramco complex in Jazan, on Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea coast, followed by another wave of missiles and drones targeting the Khamis Mushait military base. In a statement, Yemeni forces called on workers at Saudi ports to evacuate immediately. The declared targets include the ports of Jeddah, King Abdulaziz Port in Dammam, King Abdullah Port, King Fahd Industrial Port, Yanbu Commercial Port, as well as Aramco facilities and refineries. In response, the Saudis launched strikes on the Yemeni capital, confirming that the escalation is now underway. The Saudis and Yemenis had maintained a fragile truce that somehow held throughout the entire period of the US-Israel-Iran war. To prolong the truce, Riyadh even maintained a financing arrangement with the Houthis that included cooperation against piracy off the Horn of Africa. This escalation against Yemen places Saudi Arabia in a vulnerable position with much to lose, whereas the Houthis have very little at stake, having grown resilient through years of continuous rebuilding. The Houthi ballistic arsenal spans from tactical rockets to long-range strike weapons. At its core is the Burkan series, a lineage derived from the Iranian Qiam-1 and classic Scud with a range of 800 to 1,200 km. For strategic reaches, the group deploys the Toufan, a Shahab-3 derivative approaching a 2,000-km radius, and the newly unveiled Palestine-2, a solid-fuel, two-stage missile built to strike targets beyond the 2,000-km mark. Complementing this, they have the heavy Zelzal-3 artillery rockets, which are increasingly upgraded with precision guidance kits. In cruise missiles, they operate the Quds series, compact turbojet-powered systems based on the Iranian Soumar/Paveh design, with ranges approaching 2,000 km and modern navigation. We are talking about an arsenal of roughly 1,000-1,500 missiles assembled in Yemeni facilities with Iranian components. Full article: https://t.co/sKvvqriUK5
- Aug 18, 20262.6x their median
The permanent state of war imposed by Iran and the attacks on the Red Sea flank will force Trump into a major deal and concessions he did not consider before.
- Aug 25, 20262.3x their median
Yemenis Hit Saudi Ship Over 1,000 km Away, Proving Iran Avoided Attacking the US Navy The Houthis have successfully struck a Saudi ship roughly 1,000 kilometers away from their typical stronghold. Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi group targeted the Saudi oil tanker Amzan off the coast of Yanbu, a major northern Red Sea oil port in Saudi Arabia. The distance from Houthi-controlled northern Yemen to the waters off Yanbu is roughly 1,000 to 1,100 kilometers. This confirms what I wrote a short time ago about the Yemeni arsenal and its capability. The use of a long-range ballistic missile was confirmed by the Houthis. However, maritime security analysts and Western intelligence agencies raise the hypothesis that the Houthi announcement of a ballistic missile is mere propaganda, and that they actually used an evolution of the Quds-4 cruise missile. The thing is, unlike a ballistic missile that ascends into space, a cruise missile flies low, much like a small jet aircraft. And why were some security analysts and agencies wrong? Because the projectile struck the upper main deck, triggering a fire on the surface area. Cruise missiles, such as the Quds or Paveh families, fly low and horizontally, typically striking the side of the hull. An impact coming directly from above is the textbook signature of a ballistic missile re-entering the atmosphere at a near-vertical angle. Furthermore, Western warships and air defense radars operating in the region recorded the thermal signature and parabolic trajectory of a ballistic missile launched from northern Yemen. Why the shock? By launching precise, 1,000-kilometer strikes this far north, the Houthis are effectively demonstrating they can enforce their self-declared naval blockade against Saudi shipping along the entirety of the Red Sea. And yes, the ship was moving when it was struck. The tracking of the vessel confirmed that the Amzan was sailing from Ain Sukhna, Egypt, to the Saudi port of Yanbu when the attack occurred. The Houthis had already been using anti-ship ballistic missiles long before this attack. In fact, they went down in military history as the first organization in the world to use an anti-ship ballistic missile in actual combat, in late 2023. Read more https://t.co/8nVOi7Vjdb
- Aug 15, 20262.2x their median
The Houthis are giving Saudi facilities no respite. Further attacks against Aramco’s installations have been recorded, indicating that Iran is sustaining the escalation Jul/Ago with its regional allies while buying time to increase its missile production. And what does this mean? In the short term, it means there will be no stability in the region, and this involves both straits. At the same time, however, it will also intensify local agreements between Iran and the GCC through compensation payments that Washington still refuses to make. The GCC countries are already circumventing, and will continue to circumvent, sanctions on Iran right in front of international institutions, because their economies depend on it. And Iran itself? Everything remains as it was before the war: from the government to the control of the straits exercised through allied proxies on a missile basis.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 401K followers, an engagement rate of 0.292%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 1.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 28% are part of a thread and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.
- What is Patricia Marins's engagement rate on X?
- Patricia Marins (@pati_marins64) has an engagement rate of 0.292%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 400,597 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.292%, Patricia Marins sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @pati_marins64 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @pati_marins64 post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.