Back to @pati_marins64's profile

Patricia Marins engagement report

@pati_marins64 - 400K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.327%
of 400K followers
Per impression
1.98%
66K views on a typical post
Reach
16.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.146%
96 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 400K followers, an engagement rate of 0.327%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 53% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Patricia Marins's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.327%, Patricia Marins sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video47% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link53% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 47% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 53% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 1419 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20266.3x their median

    https://t.co/WsBSH8KUvn

    7.1K5194441535.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20264.4x their median

    Never has a president subjected the US to such global humiliation On February 28, Trump and Netanyahu ordered an attack on Iran which, in their assessment, would be swift and triumphant. What we witnessed was the exact opposite: a war against a resilient adversary that ended up exhausting several stockpiles of American weapons in just 40 days of combat. The lack of long-term planning was evident from day one. Days ago, the WSJ reported that Iran carried out more than 2,000 attacks using ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and high-precision aerial drones against targets in the Gulf. The offensive managed to strike and severely damage at least 20 American military installations spread across 8 countries in the region, causing damages of at least 13 billion dollars. Military bases became uninhabitable in the face of the Iranian onslaught, while the world felt the impact of Trump and Netanyahu’s war. A truce was then negotiated and put into effect, but Iran never accepted the terms for the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and this situation persists to this day. I wrote some time ago that the cost of the war, added to aerial operations, defensive and offensive ammunition, damage to bases, and aircraft losses, already exceeded 120 billion dollars. If we add the material damages and economic losses of the Gulf countries, we will have a total figure in the range of 300 billion, not counting other global losses. A defeat that Trump cannot change, even if he repeats the word victory every night on his social network. It was a war where all allies refused to get involved, an isolation felt even by remote countries that typically showed automatic alignment. Internally, there was a change of command and clear signs of excessive politicization. But such an embarrassment did not stop there. It has now come to light that President Donald Trump carried out a top-secret plane-swapping operation, using a food truck as a disguise due to a threat of an attack from Iran. The highly unusual maneuver took place in Ankara, Turkey, right after the NATO summit, but the details of the farce were revealed by the American press and confirmed by Trump himself. Imagine the president of the United States of America hiding in a little food truck… What a situation these people got themselves into! Read More: https://t.co/PeVPdicTmN

    4.4K1.1K13458163K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.0x their median

    Why is the success of the Houthi offensive so important for the world today? Because it is the consolidation of the Iranian influence over the two critical chokepoints: the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, through which a large share of global energy trade and a major slice of Asia to Europe goods traffic pass. In geopolitical terms, Iran is trying to expand its power even under heavy economic pressure. The logic appears to be that attack is the best defense.

    4.4K7258937130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.8x their median

    The Saudis sign a trilateral security agreement with Pakistan and Turkey. There is no other image that more clearly symbolizes Trump’s failure than the Gulf states seeking regional security arrangements. https://t.co/duAUiuYBte

    4.0K72817170135K viewsView on X
  • Mar 31, 20263.1x their median

    Nothing Will Be the Same for a Long Time The world we knew has changed and will remain different for years to come. We were still recovering from the effects of the pandemic and the war in Ukraine when the new war, started by the United States and Israel, struck hard at the infrastructure of Iran, the Persian Gulf countries, Israel itself, and Oman. These bombings were not just military actions, they delivered a deep blow to the global economy. Oil, natural gas, fertilizers, semiconductors, chemicals, metals, and even helium saw their supply drastically reduced. Recovery will be slow and painful. The Price of Destruction The damage to the region’s metallurgical infrastructure was massive and concentrated on strategically vital points. In Iran, the Mobarakeh Steel Company complex suffered the collapse of blast furnace structures and critical cooling systems in its direct reduction units and electric arc furnaces. Reconstruction costs are estimated at US$ 6 billion, with a recovery timeline of 2 to 3 years. In Bahrain, the impact focused on Aluminium Bahrain, where the attack severely damaged reduction lines and logistics, causing structural losses of US$ 2.5 billion. In the United Arab Emirates, strikes against Emirates Global Aluminium (EGA) facilities in Abu Dhabi and Dubai resulted in estimated structural damage of US$ 4.2 billion. This coordinated destruction in the three countries created a major gap in the global supply of primary metals, sharply raising operational costs and commodity prices worldwide. In the oil and gas sector, the destruction was even more brutal. The Kharg Island Terminal, Iran’s main crude oil export point, lost docking berths, pipelines, and giant storage tanks. Estimated cost: US$ 12 billion. The Asaluyeh and South Pars complex, the heart of gas and condensate processing, had fractionation towers, heat exchangers, and control systems incinerated, another US$ 10 billion in losses. The Abadan and Isfahan refineries, essential for gasoline and diesel production, were also badly damaged. When pipelines, gas lines, and pumping stations are added, the total cost for Iran’s energy sector alone reaches US$ 30.5 billion. The biggest problem is not just the money. It’s logistics. Iran needs to import turbines, special valves, and compressors that have long global production queues. Without easy access to Western suppliers, returning to pre-war levels could take 3 to 4 years. Israel also paid a heavy price. Its technology and chemical centers were hit. Semiconductor plants, such as Intel’s facility in Kiryat Gat, lost clean rooms and precision equipment. Chemical complexes in Haifa and desalination plants suffered significant damage. The total estimated cost is US$ 10 billion, with recovery times ranging from 6 months to 3 years. In Iraq, the already fragile electricity and port infrastructure lost high-voltage substations, cranes at Umm Qasr port, and grain silos. Approximate cost: US$ 5 billion. Recovery is expected to take 1 to 2 years. In the United Arab Emirates, attacks hit the Fujairah Industrial Zone, fuel tanks, the port that bypasses the Strait of Hormuz, and key gas fields and refineries such as Ruwais, Habshan, and Shah. Physical infrastructure costs exceed US$ 10 billion, with timelines from 6 months to 2 years. Kuwait and Bahrain faced direct impacts on ships and refineries. Kuwait lost a large tanker and saw its facilities operating at minimum capacity. Estimated losses: US$ 3 billion. Bahrain had its Sitra refinery damaged and pipelines affected, with repair costs around US$ 800 million and a timeline of 9 to 14 months. Oman was also hit, although on a smaller scale than its neighbors. Drone and missile strikes targeted key ports, damaging oil storage tanks and silos at Salalah, Duqm, and Sohar. Salalah, a major container and fuel hub outside the Strait of Hormuz, suffered fires in storage tanks and limited damage to cranes. Read More in my Substack: https://t.co/by67pD58TP

    2.9K96212467233K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.1x their median

    Sometimes people think I exaggerate in my criticisms of the Trump administration. But… just a few weeks ago his son-in-law Jared Kushner was going around the GCC with his hand out. Now Trump is appointing him as the envoy and negotiator with Hamas. This is a complete slap in the face to career American diplomacy, and an incomprehensible joke. One thing is making money as a family. Another is inserting the family into extremely complex, decades-old problems that demand real seriousness.

    3.4K489871594K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.0x their median

    War: India Sent More Than 3,000 Weapon Shipments to Israel A report by Amnesty International, confirmed by the Indian government, shows that Israel received 2,596 confirmed shipments of weapons between October 2023 and November 2025. These transfers did not stop there. As the organization has confirmed that exports and joint supply chains remain active in 2026, even after repeated international warnings, I dare to state that the total number of shipments, including those conducted in secrecy and those from 2026, exceeds 3,000. This places India’s military industry as an active participant in the devastation of Gaza, alongside those of the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and other European countries. In June and July 2026, Amnesty International sent official notifications to the Indian state and to nine companies involved, demanding explanations. No response was received from the authorities by the time the document was published. Meanwhile, the partnership between India and Israel continues to consolidate. In June 2026, senior officials from Israel’s Ministry of Defense made official visits to India to align regional security interests and strengthen industrial ties. Indian companies operate in partnership with Israeli defense giants such as Elbit Systems, producing armaments under the Made in India policy. Cheap Indian labor is precisely what these corporations seek. But the exports were not carried out solely by Israeli companies operating in India; they directly involved the Indian government and public-sector companies. There were direct shipments of weapons manufactured by enterprises owned by the Indian state itself and controlled by the Ministry of Defense, such as MIL and Yantra.  Even when production is carried out by an Israeli company operating inside the country, these weapons cannot leave India without explicit approval from the government in New Delhi. India’s Ministry of Commerce and its customs authorities had to issue specific military export licenses for each of the shipments sent throughout the conflict. The Indian government has stated that the country maintains a robust export-control mechanism and that all military transactions comply with international obligations and laws. However, there is no dispute over legality here, the core issue is the morality of the act itself. New Delhi is deepening ties with the Israeli defense industry, which already accounts for 15% of the country’s arms imports.  Read more: https://t.co/R8P7eOIcvh

    2.4K1.2K117111119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.8x their median

    “CIA Director Ratcliffe traveled unannounced to Moscow to warn Russian officials against attacking NATO members and providing military aid to Iran, US media reports.” You don’t make a surprise, desperate trip to a country you’re imposing sanctions on unless it’s to ask for something. It only takes two brain cells to see that this kind of visit is to ask for something, not to make threats. And curiously, after the CIA director’s visit, Russia has announced that President Pezeshkian and Putin are set to meet next week in Kyrgyzstan, on the sidelines of the SCO summit. There are no coincidences in this field. Just as there is no chance that the Iranian president will carry a message from the Russians capable of changing anything. The truth is that the Russians did very little for Iran in the war. Incredibly, Iran fought almost entirely with a national industry and rare allies, which today makes it hard to apply pressure for an end to the state of war. https://t.co/P6RN2eyQzB

    3.0K4789135160K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.6x their median

    Houthis launch missile salvo against Saudi oil facilities Saudi Arabia struck a Yemeni port area yesterday. The outcome was entirely predictable: Houthi forces responded not with a single missile, but with a salvo of at least five ballistic missiles against the Aramco complex in Jazan, on Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea coast, followed by another wave of missiles and drones targeting the Khamis Mushait military base. In a statement, Yemeni forces called on workers at Saudi ports to evacuate immediately. The declared targets include the ports of Jeddah, King Abdulaziz Port in Dammam, King Abdullah Port, King Fahd Industrial Port, Yanbu Commercial Port, as well as Aramco facilities and refineries. In response, the Saudis launched strikes on the Yemeni capital, confirming that the escalation is now underway. The Saudis and Yemenis had maintained a fragile truce that somehow held throughout the entire period of the US-Israel-Iran war. To prolong the truce, Riyadh even maintained a financing arrangement with the Houthis that included cooperation against piracy off the Horn of Africa. This escalation against Yemen places Saudi Arabia in a vulnerable position with much to lose, whereas the Houthis have very little at stake, having grown resilient through years of continuous rebuilding. The Houthi ballistic arsenal spans from tactical rockets to long-range strike weapons. At its core is the Burkan series, a lineage derived from the Iranian Qiam-1 and classic Scud with a range of 800 to 1,200 km. For strategic reaches, the group deploys the Toufan, a Shahab-3 derivative approaching a 2,000-km radius, and the newly unveiled Palestine-2, a solid-fuel, two-stage missile built to strike targets beyond the 2,000-km mark. Complementing this, they have the heavy Zelzal-3 artillery rockets, which are increasingly upgraded with precision guidance kits. In cruise missiles, they operate the Quds series, compact turbojet-powered systems based on the Iranian Soumar/Paveh design, with ranges approaching 2,000 km and modern navigation. We are talking about an arsenal of roughly 1,000-1,500 missiles assembled in Yemeni facilities with Iranian components. Full article: https://t.co/sKvvqriUK5

    2.7K6266632223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.6x their median

    Saudi Arabia - Defeat Before It Begins The conflict between the Saudis and the Houthis is a defeat for the Saudis regardless of the military outcome. The number of missiles in Yemeni hands and the vast oil facilities that are vital to the kingdom’s economy already make it clear who will lose this conflict. For the Houthis, there is little left to lose that has not already been lost and rebuilt before. Not long ago, an Israeli strike blew up the presidential palace and killed almost the entire Houthi government. What was the impact on the group? Zero. Everything is quickly reassembled and rebuilt in an improvised way, as many times as necessary. Will the Houthis unleash heavy fire against all of Saudi infrastructure? No. They will not do so for now. This is pressure coordinated with Iran, in which the Saudis are merely, and sadly, the target standing in the way, not the main cause. Read https://t.co/P6RN2eyQzB

    2.8K4968116155K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 400K followers, an engagement rate of 0.327%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 53% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

What is Patricia Marins's engagement rate on X?
Patricia Marins (@pati_marins64) has an engagement rate of 0.327%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 400,014 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.327%, Patricia Marins sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pati_marins64 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pati_marins64 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going