Back to @papigavi's profile

cabesita-chan engagement report

@papigavi - 266K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.192%
of 266K followers
Per impression
1.11%
46K views on a typical post
Reach
17.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
511
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 511 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.192%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

cabesita-chan's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.192%, cabesita-chan sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 143 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 202631x their median

    Este vídeo es como ver al Raimon original celebrar los goles de Arion Sherwind y Victor Blade https://t.co/HsLw07fGJR

    14K1.5K1423176K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202612x their median

    sigo sin procesar que este padre entrara con Baby Lover es histórico de cojones https://t.co/zmChoaHEvK

    6.1K22088117K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20268.5x their median

    El sinfónico de Yandel es la definición de aura.

    4.0K32114275K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20268.0x their median

    https://t.co/u38MdgczLr

    4.0K732138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.3x their median

    El mercado de fichajes de Sevilla, Racing y Depor es espectacular. Nada que envidiarle al del Valencia CF, parece que no llevamos 7 años sin pisar a Europa (ni olerla siquiera) Claros candidatos al descenso, todo lo que sea Mestalla lleno el resto del año y pitos que no sean dirigidos a estos sinverguenzas siento que habremos fallado como afición. Ojalá me equivoque por qué no quiero ni imaginar lo que es vivirlo, pero huele a descenso.

    2.6K53191151K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20264.6x their median

    el vicio que llevo a "Copero" y "Potrero" es salvaje. como me flipa hacer modos carrera jugador de este éstilo de verdad @clubmodocarrera ha sacado uno con estética FIFA y mola mucho aunque es una version muy beta. si sacan uno asi de Inazuma Eleven con sus respectivos equipos me vuelvo loco

    2.3K54166222K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.2x their median

    A ver si con esto la gente pone los pies en la tierra y aprovecha para pitar al palco Despertad, que llevamos más de 7 años en esta realidad.

    2.1K288049K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20264.0x their median

    Qué bonito. Disfrutarlo, nunca sabemos si viviremos algo igual. Yo he tenido la suerte de vivirlo dos veces con la gente que más quiero en el mundo. Viva España os quiero muchísimo 🇪🇸❤️⭐️⭐️

    2.0K703018K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20263.8x their median

    Lo que hubiera sido meter a Pepe Reina y Joaquín de speakers La cúspide del cuñadismo y cerrar el circulo, buah. https://t.co/SkOaPxWqLt

    1.9K471230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.7x their median

    No le pidais a un niño de 6 años que significó ver esta escena por televisión Naruto es lo mejor del mundo JODER NARUTO TE AMO GRACIAS KISHIMOTO! https://t.co/cu6QL39boc

    1.6K1813160344K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 511 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.192%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

What is cabesita-chan's engagement rate on X?
cabesita-chan (@papigavi) has an engagement rate of 0.192%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 265,572 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.192%, cabesita-chan sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @papigavi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @papigavi post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going