Back to @pangeransiahaan's profile

Pangeran engagement report

@pangeransiahaan - 192K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.09%
of 192K followers
Per impression
2.56%
81K views on a typical post
Reach
42.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
47 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.47/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 192K followers, an engagement rate of 1.09%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 81K times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pangeran's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.09%, Pangeran sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video41% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 202622x their median

    🚨JUST IN: Como’s president on Financial Fair Play after spending €342m in three years: “If you have to fine us, fine us” https://t.co/EWU3EGOea0

    43K1.6K2574494.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202615x their median

    🥺❤️ https://t.co/ABeODFHZA7

    29K2.4K199174482K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20267.1x their median

    Egy has something that none of our Europe based players does: FLAIR

    13K1.8K180115493K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20264.4x their median

    Buat komparasi aja: Iniesta itu 171 cm. Messi 170 cm. Giuly 164 cm. Giovinco yg udah keliatan kecil bgt aja msh 160cm Chanatip itu 158 cm.

    8.4K46714432712K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20263.3x their median

    Semalam liat langsung Chanatip Songkrasin dan mikir gimana bisa pemain sekecil ini (ga sampe 160 cm) bisa sukses di J League dan masuk team of the year? Apa yg bikin beda dengan pemain2 kita pernah coba main di J League?

    6.1K50024941334K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20262.9x their median

    Klo kedua teman saya bertikai, saya milih netral2 aja. Tapi klo teman saya dicolek2 sama yg bukan teman saya, ya saya milih teman saya lah

    5.5K39210915461K viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 20252.6x their median

    We're proud of our QRIS. America, dont touch our QRIS. https://t.co/uy1cfDfOww

    4.1K1.2K5047952K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.6x their median

    Dulu pas stop jadi profesional di football media, selain banyak kesibukan lain, ada plans yang waktu itu kecepetan dan ekosistem industri blom siap. Sekarang ekosistem kayanya udah siap. Saatnya Youtuber broadcast live streaming pertandingan bola.

    4.8K40218142364K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.5x their median

    Kemarin juga naik ojek. Bapaknya paruh baya. Suka sama Real Madrid. Gue tanya, klo lokal PSIM atau PSS? Dengan bangga bapaknya bilang, saya orang Bantul, Mas. Persiba Bantul!

    4.7K4059660331K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20262.5x their median

    "Klo ngomongin bola doang, bapak2 di warung juga bisa". Betul. Semua bisa ngomong. Yg jd pembeda itu bukan soal ngomong, tapi klo udah ngomong, siapa yang dengerin?

    4.7K42314311194K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 192K followers, an engagement rate of 1.09%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 81K times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is Pangeran's engagement rate on X?
Pangeran (@pangeransiahaan) has an engagement rate of 1.09%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 192,129 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.09%, Pangeran sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @pangeransiahaan have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @pangeransiahaan post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going