Andrew Wilson engagement report
@paleochristcon - 217K followers on X
Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 217K followers, an engagement rate of 0.927%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 80K times each, and 2.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.
Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Andrew Wilson's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.927%, Andrew Wilson sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 34% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 34% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 232 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 202616x their median
Y'all can hate I'm ok with that. https://t.co/pJmKrEx0ZS
- Sep 5, 20265.2x their median
https://t.co/mjsJc42Yah
- Sep 5, 20265.1x their median
One man in the Clancy trial stood against madness when everybody else pretended he was doing something wrong. Be that guy.
- Sep 10, 20264.5x their median
Can't even call women retarded anymore without a bunch of retarded women showing up.
- Sep 3, 20264.4x their median
This was the best part of the debate seeing @RealAlexJones destroy Federal Agent @paleochristcon https://t.co/DoxcoiSw89
- Sep 19, 20264.4x their median
Mean women on the internet keep calling me fat and ugly. I'll have you know I recently visited my parents and my mother told me I was very handsome. So.....how do you like them apples?
- Sep 24, 20263.8x their median
https://t.co/MpJZOJGsaQ
- Sep 24, 20263.7x their median
Woke up to find 10s of thousands of women are very very pissed off at me. The Clancy class is all kinds of upsetti spaghetti because their wittle investigation is ruined.
- Sep 3, 20263.2x their median
The energy and enthusiasm for the Kirk Conspiracy crowd is beginning to crash and burn. There just isn't anything new here or any new revelations to go through. The talking points are endlessly recycled at this point and the infighting has started.
- Sep 9, 20263.1x their median
My wife gets a lot of hate from women but the truth is they hate her because they can't get her to speak negatively about me no matter how hard they try to get her to do so. This is rare and it pisses them off.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 217K followers, an engagement rate of 0.927%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 80K times each, and 2.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.
- What is Andrew Wilson's engagement rate on X?
- Andrew Wilson (@paleochristcon) has an engagement rate of 0.927%, based on the median interactions across 61 original posts from the last 30 days against 216,871 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.927%, Andrew Wilson sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @paleochristcon have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @paleochristcon post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.33 posts per day across the measured window.