Orange Book 🍊📖 engagement report
@orangebook - 558K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 623 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.112%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 2.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 5.3x its own typical post.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Orange Book 🍊📖's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.112%, Orange Book 🍊📖 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 249 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 18, 20265.3x their median
A common point between people with low self-esteem is that they never finished what they started. They once studied some foreign language, but never got fluent. They once invested a bit, but never got wealthy. They once learned some musical instrument, or played some sport, but never pushed themselves hard enough. Every time you give up in a half-hearted way, you accumulate a bit of frustration that slowly transforms into anxiety towards yourself, and into anger towards the world. Raising your standards and following through your own commitments is the therapy.
- Oct 10, 20264.9x their median
You don’t need to be naturally talented, you need to be unnaturally persistent.
- Sep 11, 20264.7x their median
A lot of “bad habits” are just the direct consequence of not having any meaningful goal to work toward. If your ambitions require you to be the best version of yourself, you will naturally get your routine in order and adopt a healthy lifestyle. You know that’s the price to pay.
- Sep 13, 20264.4x their median
You are not serious about your goal unless you give yourself a clear deadline that comes with consequences.
- Oct 11, 20262.9x their median
You actually become luckier when you think of yourself as a lucky person; there is something about pessimistic vibes that prevent life-changing opportunities to ever reach you.
- Oct 2, 20262.3x their median
The most expensive mistakes of people's lives are timelessly the same across the generations: marrying the wrong person because they turned off their brain or their feelings, investing out of greed instead of intellectual curiosity, never growing into who they could have been because they never cultivated the required self-discipline, staying in the same environment for too many years because it felt comfortable and safe, and not making enough time for the people who mattered the most whilst they still could because they were "busy."
- Sep 6, 20262.2x their median
Signs that you are not serious about your ambitions: - you refuse to geographically move where you know you should be - you are not ready for any compromise or any sacrifice - you never struggle with any difficult problem and don't grow much as a result - you do a lot of things with no specific long-term purpose in mind, you chase short-term pleasure and short-term fun - you waste a lot of time and energy in relationships that don't bring any new ideas or don't make you feel alive and full of energy - you distract yourself by trying to help people who are not even trying to help themselves - you give a lot of advice to other people that you would definitely benefit from applying to yourself - you still live in the past, refuse to unlearn your self-limiting beliefs, still blame your childhood and past circumstances instead of growing up and moving forward - you find ways to "kill" time instead of respecting the gift of life that you were granted and finally start living up to your potential
- Oct 8, 20262.2x their median
If you married someone intellectually curious, you already set yourself up for a very wealthy life.
- Aug 31, 20261.8x their median
People who lack the courage to make choices often spend their whole lives building optionality that they will never use.
- Sep 5, 20261.8x their median
If you are focused on your own life, you will meet many people who "dislike you for no reason," but it's actually because people who don't have the courage to try to change their lives tend to resent the people who are unapologetically doing it year after year.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 623 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.112%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 2.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 5.3x its own typical post.
- What is Orange Book 🍊📖's engagement rate on X?
- Orange Book 🍊📖 (@orangebook) has an engagement rate of 0.112%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 557,523 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.112%, Orange Book 🍊📖 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @orangebook have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @orangebook post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.