Back to @opilhado's profile

Pilhado engagement report

@opilhado - 262K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.28%
of 262K followers
Per impression
10.1%
57K views on a typical post
Reach
22.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
39 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 5.8K interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 2.28%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pilhado's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.28%, Pilhado sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 139 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 5, 20263.4x their median

    A IMPRENSA ESPORTIVA SEGUE SUJA E COVARDE! TEM UMA COMENTARISTA FRACA DO SPORTV E OUTROS LACRADORES DA TURMINHA DELA QUERENDO CULPAR O NEYMAR! https://t.co/fLfne7itmI

    16K2.5K1.2K97263K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20262.6x their median

    HORA DOS BRASILEIRINHOS NUTELLAS CHORAREM COM OS ARGENTINOS! INCLUSIVE APRESENTADOR DE EMISSORA GRANDE QUE É ARGENTININHO ENRUSTIDO! 😂😂 https://t.co/y7UIIWQewF

    13K1.4K55343169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.3x their median

    MENDONÇA NÃO RECUOU, CHAMOU DECISÃO DO DINO DE ILEGAL E PEDIU INTERVENÇÃO DO PRESIDENTE DO STF! 😱 https://t.co/eABQsYWMnv

    11K1.9K18229104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.2x their median

    FAZ O L, AGORA! LULA HUMILHOU LIXEIROS E TRABALHADORES POBRES, EM DISCURSO VERGONHOSO! https://t.co/Y9O0fUCMxh

    9.5K2.8K2307968K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.0x their median

    FLÁVIO DISSE DENTRO DA GLOBO QUE PROGRAMA DO LUCIANO HUCK GANHOU FORTUNA DO VORCARO! 😱👏🏻👏🏻 https://t.co/q2ov6swzZ0

    9.3K1.9K1062168K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.8x their median

    MULHERES TRANS BANIDAS DO VÔLEI FEMININO NO BRASIL! CHEGA DE COVARDIA CONTRA AS MULHERES DO VÔLEI! 👏🏻👏🏻 https://t.co/JSwZIlkeJk

    9.3K1.1K1962093K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20261.8x their median

    O ESQUERDISTA GIL DO VIGOR DEBOCHOU DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS e TÁ SENDO DESMASCARADO NAS REDES SOCIAIS! https://t.co/WrhmmQY11i

    8.6K1.5K1872770K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20261.8x their median

    DÁ PENA DESSAS PESSOAS QUE JÁ FORAM MUITO FAMOSAS E QUE SE PRESTAM A QUALQUER PAPEL RIDÍCULO PRA APARECEREM DE NOVO! A XUXA PERDEU OS LIMITES! 😂😂 https://t.co/RKrocscaCz

    8.5K95471850181K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.6x their median

    ZEMA NÃO CEDEU NA PERGUNTA POLITIZADA DA APRESENTADORA DO JORNAL NACIONAL! 😱 https://t.co/i4oMcsI3rN

    7.8K95535429206K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.5x their median

    O CASAGRANDE, COM O PASSADO DELE, CHAMAR O NEYMAR DE “REFERÊNCIA NEGATIVA” É MUITA CARA DE PAU… E OLHA QUE NEM TENHO RAIVA DO CASAGRANDE! https://t.co/RFQ37cob1m

    7.3K9954954289K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.8K interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 2.28%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post.

What is Pilhado's engagement rate on X?
Pilhado (@opilhado) has an engagement rate of 2.28%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,039 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.28%, Pilhado sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @opilhado have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @opilhado post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going