Pilhado engagement report
@opilhado - 262K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 5.8K interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 2.28%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Pilhado's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 2.28%, Pilhado sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 139 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 5, 20263.4x their median
A IMPRENSA ESPORTIVA SEGUE SUJA E COVARDE! TEM UMA COMENTARISTA FRACA DO SPORTV E OUTROS LACRADORES DA TURMINHA DELA QUERENDO CULPAR O NEYMAR! https://t.co/fLfne7itmI
- Jul 19, 20262.6x their median
HORA DOS BRASILEIRINHOS NUTELLAS CHORAREM COM OS ARGENTINOS! INCLUSIVE APRESENTADOR DE EMISSORA GRANDE QUE É ARGENTININHO ENRUSTIDO! 😂😂 https://t.co/y7UIIWQewF
- Sep 9, 20262.3x their median
MENDONÇA NÃO RECUOU, CHAMOU DECISÃO DO DINO DE ILEGAL E PEDIU INTERVENÇÃO DO PRESIDENTE DO STF! 😱 https://t.co/eABQsYWMnv
- Aug 29, 20262.2x their median
FAZ O L, AGORA! LULA HUMILHOU LIXEIROS E TRABALHADORES POBRES, EM DISCURSO VERGONHOSO! https://t.co/Y9O0fUCMxh
- Aug 29, 20262.0x their median
FLÁVIO DISSE DENTRO DA GLOBO QUE PROGRAMA DO LUCIANO HUCK GANHOU FORTUNA DO VORCARO! 😱👏🏻👏🏻 https://t.co/q2ov6swzZ0
- Aug 15, 20261.8x their median
MULHERES TRANS BANIDAS DO VÔLEI FEMININO NO BRASIL! CHEGA DE COVARDIA CONTRA AS MULHERES DO VÔLEI! 👏🏻👏🏻 https://t.co/JSwZIlkeJk
- Jul 8, 20261.8x their median
O ESQUERDISTA GIL DO VIGOR DEBOCHOU DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS e TÁ SENDO DESMASCARADO NAS REDES SOCIAIS! https://t.co/WrhmmQY11i
- Jul 27, 20261.8x their median
DÁ PENA DESSAS PESSOAS QUE JÁ FORAM MUITO FAMOSAS E QUE SE PRESTAM A QUALQUER PAPEL RIDÍCULO PRA APARECEREM DE NOVO! A XUXA PERDEU OS LIMITES! 😂😂 https://t.co/RKrocscaCz
- Aug 25, 20261.6x their median
ZEMA NÃO CEDEU NA PERGUNTA POLITIZADA DA APRESENTADORA DO JORNAL NACIONAL! 😱 https://t.co/i4oMcsI3rN
- Jul 6, 20261.5x their median
O CASAGRANDE, COM O PASSADO DELE, CHAMAR O NEYMAR DE “REFERÊNCIA NEGATIVA” É MUITA CARA DE PAU… E OLHA QUE NEM TENHO RAIVA DO CASAGRANDE! https://t.co/RFQ37cob1m
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 5.8K interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 2.28%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post.
- What is Pilhado's engagement rate on X?
- Pilhado (@opilhado) has an engagement rate of 2.28%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,039 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 2.28%, Pilhado sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @opilhado have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @opilhado post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.