OpenJS Foundation engagement report
@openjsf - 318K followers on X
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.562% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 125 interactions, about 2.0x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.019%, OpenJS Foundation sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 120.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 462 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 5, 20262.0x their median
Maintainer Month is here, with better tools, helpful resources, and community events for the people behind the code. 💻 Check out what’s new. 👇 https://t.co/CvPO32H7d8
- Aug 28, 20261.5x their median
NativeScript 9.1 adds Node-API support, so many existing Node native addons can run with little or no change. The test runner was also rebuilt around Vitest, running real tests on a real device. More: https://t.co/MKDrMVw0vl https://t.co/c2PITTnAaG
- Aug 20, 2026
What happens when the Node.js community gets together to talk about the future? A lot. 👀 Node.js Interactive 2026 brought developers, maintainers, speakers, and open source leaders together in Atlanta for conversations about the technology and, just as importantly, the people behind it. And there was a reminder worth repeating: open source infrastructure runs on people. Supporting maintainers and strengthening communities is how we keep the ecosystem moving forward. Catch up on the conversations and takeaways from Node.js Interactive 2026 👇 https://t.co/96bKhuP97c Thank you @aviv_keller for the post. And thank you @RenderATL for having us. WE LOVE OUR COMMUNITY!
- Mar 31, 2026
Lodash gets 100M+ downloads a day. For years, it was primarily maintained by one person: @jdalton Then life happened. He stepped back. Now Lodash is entering a new phase with shared governance and support from the OpenJS Foundation. Big reminder: Open source isn’t just code. It’s people. Read more about our conversation with John-David here: https://t.co/aLvRmHV3CZ
- Apr 8, 2026
Understanding JavaScript security is more important than ever 👀 Check out our free training course to better spot security flaws in JavaScript apps, design safer systems, and bring a security-first mindset to every stage of development. Details here: https://t.co/6NH7Ub30JG https://t.co/vGGOLyFvze
- Jul 22, 2026
We’re happy to welcome three new members on the OpenJS Foundation Board of Directors, and three that were re-elected! Together, they are filling positions on the Gold, Silver and Community level. - @abbycabs is now our board chair - Matt Hernandez, @ljharb and Aaron Mitchell join as board directors - @joe_sepi and @matteocollina have been re-elected as CPC directors We are honored to have their expertise at the OpenJS Foundation! More here: https://t.co/TZBcK6Dzaf
- Jun 24, 2026
90% of the world's website are built on jQuery, and over 750 million websites are running an outdated version of jQuery right now. jQuery itself is actively maintained and the team continues to ship improvements. The problem is the long tail: sites that installed jQuery years ago and never upgraded. For organizations that can't migrate immediately, there's a practical option: HeroDevs' Never-Ending Support (NES) for jQuery provides ongoing security patches for end-of-life versions, buying teams the time they need to modernize without leaving production systems exposed in the meantime. This is the kind of ecosystem-wide thinking that makes open source sustainable at scale — not just shipping new versions, but making sure the organizations still running older ones have a safe path forward. Learn about jQuery NES → https://t.co/K94q4zCkRF
- Jun 12, 2026
You almost certainly use a project supported by the OpenJS Foundation — even if you've never heard of it. Node.js. Electron. Jest. webpack. ESLint. jQuery. Lodash. These are just some of the projects that call the OpenJS Foundation home. Together, they are downloaded billions of times each month and power applications across every industry. The OpenJS Foundation provides these projects and their maintainers with a neutral home, open governance, shared infrastructure, and security support — so they can focus on the work itself rather than the overhead of running major open source projects alone. Open source software doesn't maintain itself. It depends on people who need support and sustainable conditions to keep doing it. → Learn more about our projects: https://t.co/XKx1ZDLOQc
- Jul 6, 2026
Node.js version numbers are finally getting simpler. 🚀 Starting with Node.js 27, the project is moving away from the odd vs. even release model. ✅ One major release per year ✅ Every major release becomes LTS ✅ Version numbers align with the calendar year The new release model makes it easier to know when to upgrade. The free Node.js Upgrade Program, built in collaboration with the @openjsf, helps you understand how to upgrade. Learn more and join for free: https://t.co/fiQA1DLlpw #NodeJS #JavaScript #OpenSource
- Jun 25, 2026
What happens when you combine JavaScript, GPU acceleration, and massive datasets? https://t.co/lBxO8wbU5H v3. The latest release makes it easier to visualize and explore large scale graphs directly in the browser, helping developers turn millions of nodes and connections into something humans can actually understand. https://t.co/lBxO8wbU5H is one of the newest projects in the OpenJS Foundation ecosystem and continues to raise the bar for web based visualization. 📖 Learn more about v3: https://t.co/20SaqLcwcF
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.562% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 125 interactions, about 2.0x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is OpenJS Foundation's engagement rate on X?
- OpenJS Foundation (@openjsf) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 317,956 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.019%, OpenJS Foundation sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @openjsf have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @openjsf post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.