Back to @op7418's profile

歸藏(guizang.ai) engagement report

@op7418 - 182K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.112%
of 182K followers
Per impression
0.471%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
23.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
202
interactions (median)
Saved
0.126%
54 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 202 interactions against 182K followers, an engagement rate of 0.112%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.471% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 31% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 156x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

歸藏(guizang.ai)'s engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.112%, 歸藏(guizang.ai) sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 2026156x their median

    iPhone Duo… a whole new way to iPhone. Pre-orders start today. https://t.co/yh0Ow1Vj74

    28K1.7K1.1K3031.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202634x their median

    With everyone busily using LLMs + Blender/Three.js to make 3D models, I thought I'd try a different geometric representation. This dragon isn't a mesh, NeRF, 3DGS, or video model: it's 27kb of GLSL code (generated via LLM), defining a closed-form implicit surface. 🧵 [1/n] https://t.co/o0fMwGk7Id

    6.2K47513970682K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202628x their median

    Grok Bot can now use 1Password. Share items in a vault, approve each fill, and the secrets stay in your password manager. https://t.co/2NFlwq6hkv

    4.9K300295155434K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20265.1x their median

    GPT-6 Astra + Blender + Godot Engine GPT-6 仅用 20X 3% 的额度,帮我做出了一个完整的 3D Roguelike 游戏关卡 昼夜循环、天气系统、3D 建模、贴图、武器切换、技能系统,以及近战和远程的小怪 https://t.co/me2MyX4sRv

    881677615234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.0x their median

    GPT-6 Astra 做软件宣传视频实在是太强了! 这个视频从配乐到音效到组件,全部都是 GPT-6 Astra 自己处理的。 没有用任何生成模型,纯代码,而且它是基于我的 Codepilot 组件和设计语言做的。 跟软件本身的风格和效果都非常搭配。 如果有人需要的话,我看要不要打包个 skill 给大家用。 https://t.co/kaXus6puTi

    48037273950K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.9x their median

    穷玩车,富玩表,顶富 astra 说你好 https://t.co/ehmvsxekn6

    5041569381K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.7x their median

    让 Grok bot 每天早上定时出一个 AI 早报的视频,没想到效果还真挺不错的! 全程都没用我本地电脑,全跑在它的云端虚拟机上,包括内容收集、写代码和视频渲染。 我写了个提示词,直接复制过去的话,你的 Grok bot 也能执行这些任务 提示词太长放下面了 https://t.co/dYDB0JrsEd

    3644811123138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.6x their median

    Anthropic 这个 Haiku 5.5 真是盯着中国的这几个甜点级模型打,太恶心了! 我对比了一下它和几个中国竞品的价格和测试评分 从价格来看,它比 DeepSeek-V4.1 flash 和智谱的 GLM 5.3 flash 都便宜 从测试集和一些分数来看,在 Terminal Bench 4.0 上,AA 的测试比 5.3 flash 高一分,也跟 5.3 flash 相同,比其他两个更高

    3442813017159K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20262.4x their median

    卧槽,特斯拉这个新的跑车太离谱了 居然能短暂飞行并且在空中调整姿态 演示的时候可以直接跳起来反转然后正常落地 https://t.co/AEP6AVWLKN

    3061813325150K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20262.3x their median

    I had @bot build a tier list of how positive my interactions with AI creators are, fun experiment. Not sure why it put @theo in his own tier 💁 https://t.co/Eyby4OkqZt

    40874512118K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 202 interactions against 182K followers, an engagement rate of 0.112%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.471% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 31% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 156x its own typical post.

What is 歸藏(guizang.ai)'s engagement rate on X?
歸藏(guizang.ai) (@op7418) has an engagement rate of 0.112%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 182,213 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.112%, 歸藏(guizang.ai) sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @op7418 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @op7418 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going