Back to @omid9's profile

Omid Djalili engagement report

@omid9 - 361K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.09%
of 361K followers
Per impression
2.40%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
327
interactions (median)
Saved
0.099%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 327 interactions against 361K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 132x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #arsche, #gaza, #namaste.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #arsche, #gaza, #namaste.

Compared with accounts its own size

Omid Djalili's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, Omid Djalili sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link56% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 399 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 23, 2026132x their median

    Based on verification of images, reports and comparative investigative analysis by the International Centre for Human Rights, to date approximately 43,000 people have been killed, 350,000 injured, 20,000 arrested and await possible execution. “Taken together, ICHR believes that this body of evidence, methods, and data presents a clear picture of a systematic and organized campaign of repression and mass killing; one that may silence the streets in the short term, but will not resolve the underlying crisis. Silence by the international community in the face of such violent repression and crimes against humanity will only enable the repetition and escalation of these atrocities.” #IranMassacre Full article here: https://t.co/hWOfLsaA96

    25K14K3.4K1.7K2.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026100x their median

    Nader Mohammadi 🇮🇷 with a RIDICULOUS assist in Russia’s 2nd Division 😭😭😭😭 https://t.co/y14luKY7TB

    29K2.7K3034473.2M viewsView on X
  • Jan 26, 202694x their median

    Nothing on @BBCNews about #IranMassacre - not one article. If I’m being kind it might be because the general population of Britain can’t quite believe there is now overwhelming evidence that so called “security forces” in another country are exterminating their citizens by the thousands mostly shooting them in the head at point blank range for peaceful protest when in Britain you can’t get the police to come out if you’ve had your car stolen. https://t.co/eUDbVcFfO1

    21K7.2K1.6K473927K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202657x their median

    I stand by my opinion about Sacha Baron Cohen ridiculing Muslims. His Ali G character had ambiguous origins for the first four years. His name was Ali and his uncle's name was Jamal. Naturally, a lot of people assumed he was Muslim. Only later did he reveal the character's name as Alistair Leslie Graham after four years of ambiguity. Cohen's career then included a racist depiction of Borat from Muslim Kazakhstan. And then there was the Muammar Gaddafi impression in the Dictator film. Baron Cohen was brought up an orthodox Jew, speaks Hebrew and has spent a lot of time in Israel. He has made a series about Mossad and has made public statements supportive of Israel. Join the dots - he's a Zionist ridiculing his enemies.

    15K1.4K2.2K1421.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202628x their median

    I’ve seen a lot said about Ed Miliband meeting the Islamic regime foreign minister. But this concise article by @JakeWSimons says it best: “When jihadists are your underdogs and democracies are your oppressors, you’ve lost the moral argument.” Our Foreign Secretary should take the time to consider how his handshake looks to the many thousands of Iranian parents “whose children were slaughtered like animals on the streets, or blinded and castrated with shotguns, or hanged for the crime of wanting freedom, or executed by armed men as they lay in hospital.” https://t.co/AJ3ocoqRaN

    6.9K2.0K25178149K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202622x their median

    Apparently Iranians cannot understand why the slaughter of 30,000+ went unnoticed in the West. But we do. Iransplained by western “influencers” and so called journalists & news outlets downplaying a human catastrophe for political reasons - we know who you are - will go down as one of the most disgraceful episodes in history. So for all those who aggressively questioned me and other Iranians speaking out - calling us liars and the massacre “Mossad propaganda” - here is your evidence: Lorry loads of dead bodies after the brutal murders by the regime in January. This videos is of one place at one time but the scenes of slaughter, hospitals and makeshift morgues were replicated all across the country as seen in the new documentary “This Is Our Story” on YouTube now. As of now 11,500 bodies are still missing (as mentioned at the end of the ITV doc film “Inside Iran”) with many feared held in cold storage by the regime, or disposed of in unspeakably inhumane ways. When the people rise up again imminently, the only relevant question for everyone is this: will you support the people trying to rid themselves of this evil regime? Or will you stand with tyrannical murderers? It is that binary of a question now.

    4.9K2.0K1256597K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202619x their median

    This is an essential read. And important to acknowledge that the Daily Mail - itself a much criticised news outlet - was one of the very few that continued to cover events unfolding inside Iran behind digital blackouts from January - May this year. When the dust settles and people acknowledge the truth of what actually transpired inside Iran, there will be many discoveries as to why the world turned away from the Iranian people in their time of need. Even when the US and Israel acted, it was sadly way too late. Those of us who were calling for “RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT”, a @UN norm to halt mass atrocity and crimes against humanity - in force when President Obama intervened in Libya in 2011 - we were then branded ‘war mongers’. With the evidence laid bare now, anyone who did, shame on you. Many individuals and entities who dismissed the atrocities of the regime will be found out and exposed. And to those who only showed an interest in Iran after the disaster of the school bombing on Feb 28th, a special mention for you: Playing politics with millions of lives, ignoring the massacres by the Islamic regime whilst more than ready to lay blame on the US and Israel by focusing only on the Minab tragedy, turning attention away from the people inside Iran being slaughtered by the regime into a propaganda war between “imperialism” and “the resistance” is particularly despicable. Siding with the Islamic Republic - which is neither Islamic nor a republic - is shameful. It is NOT, and never was ‘the resistance’. It is a radicalised, fanatical cult, hell bent on clinging to power. At any cost. Human or otherwise. https://t.co/TeqpHRHJzw

    4.5K1.4K9439128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202614x their median

    In the history of the planet there has never existed a more loathsome, backward, cruel, tyrannical, wantonly evil, death obsessed, nonsensical regime. Yet: Labour Union Boss Urges Conference to Campaign Against Regime Change in Iran. https://t.co/CiYd0kRxB7

    3.6K9081283867K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202613x their median

    News coming in of the passing of Dolly Parton. Great singer and underrated comedy thinker. A quote famously attributed to her. Loved this country music legend. https://t.co/LKVjU6kDVT

    4.1K27720762K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20268.3x their median

    So yes. I voiced YUSUF AMIR. Next month is the 17th anniversary of ‘The Ballad of Gay Tony’ dropping on GTA IV for @RockstarGames - how time flies. At the 2009 Spike Video Game Awards, The Ballad of Gay Tony won the Best DLC award. Yusuf Amir won “Most Disgraceful Character” which is saying something. Fun fact: wonderful creating madness with New Yorker Mario D’Leon who - truth be told - was just as bemused by me as a person, as his character Luis was bemused by the shameful Yusuf 😊

    2.4K224961068K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#arsche#gaza#namaste

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 327 interactions against 361K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 132x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #arsche, #gaza, #namaste.

What is Omid Djalili's engagement rate on X?
Omid Djalili (@omid9) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 361,390 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, Omid Djalili sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @omid9 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @omid9 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going