Back to @omgitsfsk's profile

Amayel 🎀 engagement report

@omgitsfsk - 117K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.697%
of 117K followers
Per impression
2.68%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
26.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
818
interactions (median)
Saved
0.103%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 818 interactions against 117K followers, an engagement rate of 0.697%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 2.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tag: #maroc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Amayel 🎀's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.697%, Amayel 🎀 sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 202619x their median

    đŸ‡«đŸ‡· FLASH - Entre 85% et 90% des personnes placĂ©es en garde Ă  vue suite aux blocages lycĂ©ens sont des MINEURS. (TF1-LCI)

    14K1.1K337213884K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202617x their median

    https://t.co/xOvZKJPqYb

    13K9412526232K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202616x their median

    Nan j’crois vous vous rendez pas compte du niveau d’cette gĂ©nĂ© https://t.co/GcRtMxh0rE

    12K1.2K443871.9M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202611x their median

    les pacifistes du dimanche j’peux tellement pas https://t.co/2PBu4praIk

    7.9K48871252512K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20267.8x their median

    EN VRAI pourquoi les 2000 - 2003 on va pas soutenir les lycéens ça parle que sur Twitter au lieu de sortir

    5.6K415112258491K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20267.6x their median

    Louer un RSQ8, faire un accident, le mettre RSV, et ensuite faire une cagnotte pour qu'on t'aide Ă  rembourser. Vous fumez quel genre de dorĂ© 😂

    5.8K40818282.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20264.9x their median

    Un cortÚge de plusieurs centaines de lycéens et étudiants se dirigent vers Neuilly sur Seine. https://t.co/Q7sBatnlNL

    3.2K55270101595K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20262.0x their median

    Daghene di signer polygamie « au cas oĂč » mais djiguenn amoul droit diem am sĂ©curitĂ© financiĂšre « au cas oĂč » https://t.co/qvmwvxadj2

    1.3K32941132K viewsView on X
  • Jan 21, 2023

    – Donc, conclut Socrate, si ce que tu vas me dire n’est ni vrai, ni bon, ni utile, alors pourquoi me le dire?

    916173209862K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    Y’a un mec qui me HARCÈLE d’appels et de messages jusqu’à il m’a dit mĂȘme si tu me bloques dou takh me meyla diam et il connait chez moi, il habite dans mon quartierđŸ§đŸŸâ€â™€ïž 1er degrĂ© j’ai peur

    851284719116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#maroc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 818 interactions against 117K followers, an engagement rate of 0.697%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 2.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Amayel 🎀's engagement rate on X?
Amayel 🎀 (@omgitsfsk) has an engagement rate of 0.697%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 117,350 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.697%, Amayel 🎀 sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @omgitsfsk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @omgitsfsk post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going