Back to @ojeconomico's profile

Jornal Económico engagement report

@ojeconomico - 241K followers on X

Measured over 99 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 241K followers
Per impression
0%
616 views on a typical post
Reach
0.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 241K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 99 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 616 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.255% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 99 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.

Measured over 99 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jornal Económico's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Jornal Económico sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link99% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 2026

    Pelo menos 22 mortos em acidente com autocarro na ilha cabo-verdiana do Fogo | Jornal Económico https://t.co/TV9s8QiN2e

    32001.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    O “Project Horizon” está na fase decisiva. Já é conhecida a estrutura completa dos ativos problemáticos de Luís Filipe Vieira que estão à venda, bem como o respetivo valor. Saiba mais em https://t.co/miih5uHz4j https://t.co/akVqjo2kUq

    31002.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    Carneiro elogia Centeno e diz que só o próprio pode decidir se quer ser militante do PS | Jornal Económico https://t.co/OoIj45ejKC

    2010749 viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    Chega propõe alteração ao IRS para aumentar o rendimento disponível das famílias | Jornal Económico https://t.co/oCEtEl6xtM

    1110850 viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    Reservas do Estado para uso imediato de gasóleo e gasolina estão abaixo de 30 dias de consumo. Governo junta crude e combustíveis do público e privados no país e lá fora para garantir 92 dias. Saiba mais em https://t.co/SK8RrTjY9W https://t.co/ckb6p24OGw

    2010360 viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Moonshot AI prepara entrada na bolsa de Hong Kong para o primeiro trimestre de 2027 | Jornal Económico https://t.co/e3S1fQjBr2

    2100618 viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    No novo episódio do “Conversas a Metro”, Patrícia Barão, presidente da APEMIP, analisa os desafios do mercado e deixa um alerta: é preciso mais oferta, processos mais rápidos e estabilidade nas regras. 🎙️ Ouça o episódio completo em https://t.co/e095ZlbA78 https://t.co/1mr1rhjDMv

    1100393 viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Guterres deixa a ONU e deverá ser substituído por uma mulher | Jornal Económico https://t.co/XYhLFcutxV

    2000599 viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Thorsten Kötschau: Investir em Portugal “não significa fuga ou afastamento" da Alemanha | Jornal Económico https://t.co/WcaIU6ldmm

    2000436 viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    Benfica é a SAD mais valiosa em Portugal avaliada em quase 600 milhões | Jornal Económico https://t.co/jkAyKt0I5S

    1010280 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 241K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 99 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 616 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.255% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 99 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.

What is Jornal Económico's engagement rate on X?
Jornal Económico (@ojeconomico) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 99 original posts from the last 30 days against 241,120 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Jornal Económico sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ojeconomico have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ojeconomico post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going