Back to @offsectraining's profile

OffSec engagement report

@offsectraining - 331K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.008%
of 331K followers
Per impression
0.309%
8.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.50%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26
interactions (median)
Saved
0.127%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 331K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 0.309% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 424 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026. Recurring tag: #kali.

Compared with accounts its own size

OffSec's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, OffSec sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 555 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202616x their median

    🚨 CVE-2026-72898: A critical unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in Metabase is being actively exploited. The vulnerability affects the password-reset flow and can ultimately allow an attacker to gain administrator access to a vulnerable Metabase instance. Our latest technical breakdown covers: → How CVE-2026-72898 works → Affected Metabase versions → The exploitation flow and potential impact → What defenders should look for → Mitigation steps → How to safely validate the vulnerability in OffSec’s Offensive Cyber Range Read the full analysis: https://t.co/jKO2ZRFroi Explore the lab: https://t.co/w9oIUXPUbG #CVE #Cybersecurity #Metabase #VulnerabilityResearch #OffSec

    353644325K viewsView on X
  • Mar 31, 20269.8x their median

    #OSAI is officially here! 📣🐺 OffSec’s newest certification for hands-on offensive operations against AI-enabled systems is now available for purchase with Learn One, Course & Cert Bundle, and Learn Enterprise. Built for practitioners who want to apply an adversary mindset to modern AI systems and stay ahead as the attack surface evolves. 🔗 https://t.co/SRN3DaGaNi

    1983818237K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.3x their median

    🚨 ICYMI: CVE-2026-72898: Critical Metabase SQL injection, CVSS 10.0, no authentication required — and active exploitation has been confirmed. See how it works, what to look for, how to mitigate it, and how to safely test it in OffSec's Offensive Cyber Range. Explore the lab: https://t.co/e8EGvFrXdr #CVE #Cybersecurity #Metabase #VulnerabilityResearch #OffSec

    130294115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20266.1x their median

    🤩 PEN-200 LEARNERS! NEW PREP OFFERING! Introducing HackTrack, a free 10-week, mentor-led learning program for PEN-200 learners with active lab access. Preparing for the OSCP certification takes more than completing labs—it takes consistent practice, proven methodology, and accountability. ✏️ OffSec Student Mentors will guide you through complete walkthroughs of carefully selected OSCP-style machines while demonstrating the methodology, decision-making process, and troubleshooting techniques used throughout the OSCP exam. 📅 Starts: August 15 🕓 Saturdays at 16:00 GMT 🎯 Free for PEN-200 learners with active lab access Register today and stay on track toward OSCP success. Register Now: https://t.co/LWbShoGyGl #TryHarder

    139181033K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.7x their median

    You can't learn penetration testing just by reading about it. You have to get your hands dirty. 🛠️ 🏆 That's why our PEN-200 (OSCP) and PEN-300 (OSEP) courses and certifications are considered the gold standard in the industry. PEN-200/: Drops you into realistic labs to master the fundamentals of enumeration, exploitation, and Active Directory attacks. PEN-300: Takes those skills to the next level, forcing you to develop custom tools to bypass modern enterprise defenses (EDR/AV). Both end with brutal, hands-on, live-environment exams. If you pass, you didn't just memorize answers—you proved you can actually do the job. Where are you at in your journey? 🐉 PEN-200 (OSCP) > https://t.co/VqI9wO8n6U 🥷 PEN-300 (OSEP) > https://t.co/0UC6HJzqWC #OSCP #OSEP #OffensiveSecurity #PenTest

    11551012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.9x their median

    Are you a SOC Analyst tired of just chasing false positives? 🚨 SOC-200 takes you under the hood of real-world attacks. You won't just learn how to use a SIEM; you'll learn how to parse Windows/Linux logs, detect Active Directory abuse, and counter spear-phishing tactics. The OSDA exam proves you can handle the pressure of a live simulated corporate breach. Build your intuition. Defend the network. Start here ➡️ https://t.co/4v3GzWV6W3 #BlueTeam #CyberDefense #IncidentResponse #OffSec

    91101011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.5x their median

    "I built an autonomous security agent" is a demo. "I built an eval that shows where it breaks" is engineering. 🛠️🧠 OffSec Community Member Ali Abdollahi just published a brilliant piece on why building powerful offensive AI is easy, but teaching it "what not to attack" is incredibly hard. If you are following the AI agent hype, read this reality check: https://t.co/UTlGvuS78S #AISecurity #OffSec #RedTeam #MachineLearning #InfoSec

    8092010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.4x their median

    There are certs that get you an interview, and then there are certs that get you a nod of respect from the senior red teamer. The OSCP does both. 🤝💻 🏁 Hiring managers want it because it proves you can actually hack, not just pass a multiple-choice test. ☕ Your peers respect it because they know exactly how much coffee, frustration, and "Try Harder" moments went into earning it. Are you ready to join the club? 🔗 https://t.co/VqI9wO8n6U #OSCP #OffSec #TryHarder #RedTeam #CyberSecurity #PenTesting

    7962113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.8x their median

    ⭕ NEW! HackTrack! Join OffSec Student Mentors for a guided walkthrough of Robust, where you'll learn the methodology behind approaching an OSCP-style machine. This week's focus: 🌐 Web Application Enumeration 💉 SQL Injection 🔐 Post-Exploitation Credential Discovery Build a repeatable approach to moving from enumeration to exploitation—skills you'll use throughout PEN-200 and on exam day. 📅 Saturday, August 21 🕓 16:00 GMT Register Now: https://t.co/LWbShoGyGl #TryHarder

    629109.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.7x their median

    Sirens going off? Blue Team, it's time to step up. 🚨🛡️ 🔵 SOC-200 teaches you to triage alerts, analyze logs, and hunt threats using industry tools like ELK and Splunk. No multiple-choice tests. Just a 24-hour, hands-on exam to earn your OSDA certification. Prove you can defend a live corporate network against active attackers under pressure. Ready to hold the line? Explore SOC-200: https://t.co/LBPSZyuiU3 #BlueTeam #OffSec #OSDA #CyberSecurity #SOCAnalyst #InfoSec

    6440213K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#kali

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 331K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 0.309% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 424 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is OffSec's engagement rate on X?
OffSec (@offsectraining) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 331,251 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, OffSec sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @offsectraining have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @offsectraining post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going