oddgems ⋈ engagement report
@oddgems - 106K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 106K followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 0.895% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 376x its own typical post.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
oddgems ⋈'s engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.053%, oddgems ⋈ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 161 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 28, 2026376x their median
JUST IN: 🇦🇪 UAE's largest airline 'Emirates' begins accepting crypto payments for flight bookings.
- Jul 13, 2026174x their median
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says countries must pay the US for defending the Strait of Hormuz.
- Jul 27, 2026157x their median
esse é o ponto exato de encontro entre o oceano atlântico e pacífico! mas alguém sabe explicar porque é assim?? eles não se misturam 😳😳 https://t.co/RzLadwTSqX
- Jul 14, 202635x their median
Which project is quietly setting up for a big run?
- Jul 12, 20269.3x their median
📊BLACKROCK'S TOKENIZED TREASURY FUND BUIDL SURPASSES $900 MILLION ON AVALANCHE The fund doubled in a week, adding roughly $436 million as total AUM across chains reached $2.87 billion. BUIDL is now one of the largest on-chain tokenized Treasury products in the world, per RWA xyz.
- Jul 13, 20267.3x their median
Securitize has surpassed $5B in total RWA value making us the first tokenization platform to reach this milestone. Institutional demand for tokenized assets continues to grow at an unprecedented rate. Tokenize the World. https://t.co/D0x4ZdFu51
- Jul 3, 20264.3x their median
In a world full of Solanas, be Avalanche https://t.co/21WaZM2A3G
- Jun 4, 20263.8x their median
https://t.co/2UJhQ7E7UA
- Sep 27, 20262.4x their median
$NEAR has come a long way, 5x since the bottom. It keeps pushing higher and higher! Something similar might happen with $AVAX as its lagging despite all the bullish news. Similarly $W, $FLOW, $BAT, $RED, $APT and so many others.
- Nov 14, 2022
KISS STRATEGY - Keep It Super Simple. https://t.co/vhcpSTkIEi
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 106K followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 0.895% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 376x its own typical post.
- What is oddgems ⋈'s engagement rate on X?
- oddgems ⋈ (@oddgems) has an engagement rate of 0.053%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 105,628 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.053%, oddgems ⋈ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @oddgems have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @oddgems post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.