Back to @nytimesarts's profile

New York Times Arts engagement report

@nytimesarts - 2.3M followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 2.3M followers
Per impression
0.188%
4.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.188% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.182% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 1296x its own typical post.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

New York Times Arts's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, New York Times Arts sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 182 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 20261296x their median

    RM, of BTS, started collecting in 2018 and is likely to draw new audiences to SFMOMA to see the results. “I’m an artist from Korea, and I know Picasso, I know van Gogh. I don’t know anyone from my country.” He told himself, “You have to find your root.” https://t.co/HmnDs9l8dH

    6.9K3.4K463694K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026139x their median

    “La Bola Negra,” the Spanish epic about three gay men, won the Toronto International Film Festival’s People’s Choice Award, which can be predictive of best picture at the Oscars. https://t.co/26Dp1ElJ7C

    96812871141K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202659x their median

    In 1971 this film was a scandal. In 2026 it’s a respected period piece. How “Ken Russell’s The Devils” became a cinephiles’ darling. https://t.co/bu9W9xDM2c

    405640526K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202657x their median

    “Once Upon a Time in Harlem” is an astounding documentary that’s the realization of a decades-old dream of the maverick director William Greaves, who in 1972 convened the remaining members of the Harlem Renaissance for a fascinating party that he filmed. https://t.co/fFlzDZS4RE

    3441052627K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202631x their median

    After a seven-year run marked most recently by attacks from the Trump administration, Lonnie G. Bunch III announced on Tuesday that he was stepping down as secretary of the Smithsonian. https://t.co/BNmUNV4I0h

    171587849K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202624x their median

    Review: Hannah Einbinder and Gillian Anderson star in an exhilarating tale of a filmmaker rebooting a problematic slasher franchise. https://t.co/sfvKEZ7seY

    161223233K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202619x their median

    In “The Samurai and the Prisoner,” Kiyoshi Kurosawa directs a satisfying period piece about the tense collaboration between a lord and a cunning envoy. It’s a Critic’s Pick. https://t.co/FaKIVe0L4H

    114331230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202618x their median

    The Cramps introduced the world to “psychobilly” and turned Henry Rollins and Ian MacKaye into fans. Now Rollins and MacKaye are part of an effort to bring the music back. https://t.co/LlhYRNNceG

    103305219K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202611x their median

    “Your Mother Your Mother Your Mother” was conceived well before Mahershala Ali and Bassam Tariq met for “Blade,” the Marvel project that ultimately fell apart. They explain how the new film is rooted in faith and fatherhood. https://t.co/Bv7pgpsfMl

    6821209.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20267.6x their median

    ‘Dead Souls’ review: The “Repo Man” director Alex Cox returns with an unabashedly weird western, where he plays a mysterious stranger in an Arizona border town, circa 1890. https://t.co/BKqjfugyqA

    5260314K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.188% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.182% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 1296x its own typical post.

What is New York Times Arts's engagement rate on X?
New York Times Arts (@nytimesarts) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,336,994 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, New York Times Arts sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nytimesarts have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @nytimesarts post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going