Sony Thăng engagement report

Best tweets

• Mar 21, 2025145x their median

  They said no one could stand against empire. But Vietnam did. And we didn’t fight with words alone. We fought with steel in our spine and fire in our lungs. We fought barefoot in the mud, with rusted rifles, against superpowers who thought the world was theirs to rule. We made them bleed until they crawled back across oceans—beaten, broken, and no longer so sure of themselves. And we built what they said could never rise—a nation that never forgot the cost of freedom. Empire is not eternal. Resistance is.

  65K17K2.5K8733.0M viewsView on X
• Sep 30, 202611x their median

  Henry Kissinger died at one hundred years old. In his bed. After a life that included, by documented record: the secret bombing of Cambodia, the facilitation of the coup that brought Pinochet to power, the green light to Indonesia's invasion of East Timor, and the continuation of a war he privately knew was unwinnable because losing it before an election was politically inconvenient. He died at one hundred years old and was eulogized by heads of state. This is not an aberration. This is the terminal destination of a system that has no external enforcement mechanism for the people at the top. International law exists. It has courts. Those courts have, with some consistency, prosecuted African heads of state and Yugoslav military commanders and Rwandan génocidaires. They have not prosecuted an American. Not one. The law, like most things, is differently weighted depending on which direction you're looking from. Kissinger died at one hundred. In his bed. Understand what that means about where the consequences actually live.

  4.2K1.8K26511691K viewsView on X
• Oct 3, 20265.3x their median

  The U.S. does not have a human rights policy. It has a human rights vocabulary. It says "genocide" when an enemy kills. It says "security" when an ally kills. It says "terrorism" when the poor fight back. It says "unfortunate" when a drone hits a family. Everyone has seen this pattern. The only people who still buy the story are those who need the story more than they need the truth.

  2.1K953333020K viewsView on X
• Oct 1, 20264.6x their median

  America dropped nuclear bombs on civilian cities. It is the only country in history to have done this. It then spent eighty years telling every other country they couldn't be trusted with nuclear weapons. Sit with the geometry of that sentence. Sit with it until it becomes uncomfortable.

  1.8K791501919K viewsView on X
• Sep 30, 20264.3x their median

  The International Criminal Court exists. The United States is not a member. It withdrew its signature under Bush, citing concerns that American military and political personnel might face prosecution. Read that again. The world's most powerful democracy, the country that styles itself the guarantor of the "rules-based international order," refused membership in the primary institution of international criminal accountability because its officials might be held accountable. This is not hypocrisy in the casual sense. It is a structural declaration. The rules apply to you. The rules were built by us and we enforce them on you and we fund the institutions that apply them to you and we reference them in our justifications for intervention in your country. But they do not apply to us. Because we wrote them. And we left ourselves out. This is the legal architecture of impunity, written in plain sight, submitted as formal policy, and largely unreported in the countries whose citizens fund it.

  1.6K872232619K viewsView on X
• Sep 28, 20263.8x their median

  The tell was always what both parties agreed on. Not what they fought about. What they agreed on. They fought about abortion. They agreed on the military budget. They fought about immigration. They agreed on Wall Street deregulation. They fought about trans athletes. They agreed on not taxing unrealized capital gains. They fought about Dr. Seuss. They agreed on drone warfare. They fought about cancel culture. They agreed on the surveillance architecture built after 2001 that has never been dismantled. The fights were loud, personal, morally charged, identity-coded, and covered wall to wall. The agreements were made in committee, in legislative language nobody reads, in budget line items, in appointments to regulatory agencies whose names most voters couldn't name. Democracy, in this arrangement, is the performance of disagreement about the things that don't threaten the arrangement. The things that threaten the arrangement are handled through the bipartisan consensus that the performance is specifically designed to make invisible. Watch what they agree on. Everything else is theater with a very large production budget.

  1.5K648434824K viewsView on X
• Oct 1, 20263.2x their median

  Here's what they could not bomb. They could bomb the roads. They bombed the roads. Vietnam moved supplies at night, on bicycles, through jungle paths, through routes so dispersed and adaptive that no bombing campaign could cut them. They could bomb the cities. They bombed the cities. Vietnam moved the cities underground. Entire hospitals. Entire schools. Entire command structures, built into tunnels, kept operational through years of bombardment. They could bomb the supply lines from the north. They bombed them constantly. Vietnam repaired them faster than they could be destroyed. Tens of thousands of people, many of them women, many of them teenagers, worked around the clock to fill bomb craters and rebuild bridges and keep the lines open. They could not bomb the reason. The reason the Vietnamese were fighting. The reason they were willing to live in tunnels and eat whatever they could find and watch their villages burn and keep fighting. The reason, which was simply: This is our country and we will determine what happens in it. That reason lives in a place no bomb reaches. It lives in the decision. The collective, generational, absolute decision of a people that their dignity is not for sale and their submission is not available at any price. When a people reach that decision, when enough of them reach it, deeply enough, the military calculus stops working. All the tons of bombs and all the chemical weapons and all the counterinsurgency manuals become irrelevant. Because the war is no longer being fought over territory. It's being fought over whether the people will break. And Vietnam did not break. After everything. After Agent Orange and carpet bombing and Phoenix Program assassinations and "free fire zones" and napalm and the systematic destruction of every physical thing that could be destroyed: The people did not break. The people won. There is no more powerful demonstration in modern history of what human will can do against imperial force than what Vietnam did. And they know it. Which is why their military academies study it. Which is why their strategists are still writing about it. Which is why the word "Vietnam" is still the word their politicians reach for when they want to describe something that went wrong beyond recovery. They study it because it frightens them. It should. It should frighten every empire that thinks enough firepower can substitute for the right to be where you are. Vietnam proved it can't.

  1.3K546281615K viewsView on X
• Oct 2, 20263.0x their median

  How many times can the same lie work. They said Vietnam was about "freedom." They said Iraq was about "freedom." They said Libya was about "freedom." Now they say every new bombing run is about "freedom." The graves are full of liberated people. In 2026, if you still believe U.S. interventions are about human rights, it is because your own rights have never been under their planes. You are not the audience of the bomb. You are the audience of the speech. And that is exactly why they keep giving you one.

  1.2K552312012K viewsView on X
• Sep 30, 20262.2x their median

  Lockheed Martin generated $54 billion in U.S. government revenue in 2025. Fifty-four billion dollars. From one company. In one year. This is not a defense budget line item. This is a structural relationship. A company that size, dependent on government contracts that size, does not wait passively for the government to decide what weapons it needs. It employs more lobbyists than most countries have diplomats. It funds think tanks that produce the strategic frameworks that define what threats require what responses. It employs retired generals whose job is to explain, on cable news, why the current geopolitical situation requires the capabilities Lockheed produces. It has manufacturing facilities distributed across enough congressional districts that cutting its contracts would mean cutting jobs in enough members' home states to make the vote politically fatal. The weapons do not exist because the threat was assessed and the weapon was deemed necessary. In many cases, the threat is assessed, at least in part, by people whose income depends on the weapon being deemed necessary. This is not conspiracy theory. This is published lobbying data, publicly available employment records, and observable congressional behavior. The question is not whether this happens. The question is why it's not the first thing taught in every American civics class.

  858403161813K viewsView on X
• Sep 30, 20261.8x their median

  They will tell you that America learned from Vietnam. This is the story they tell themselves. The "Vietnam syndrome," the public reluctance to commit to ground wars, lasted for years after 1975. They reformed their military. They abolished the draft. They professionalized their armed forces. They developed new doctrines. They studied counterinsurgency. They wrote new manuals. They did all of this. And then they did Iraq. And then they did Afghanistan. And they lost in Afghanistan after twenty years, twenty years, the same duration as Vietnam, and those last helicopters leaving Kabul looked remarkably like the last helicopters leaving Saigon. The same helicopters. The same urgency. The same chaos. The same local people who had been promised something being left behind. The same empire leaving with its tail between its legs after two decades of being unable to break a people who had decided they didn't want to be broken. They didn't learn from Vietnam. They couldn't learn from Vietnam. Because the lesson of Vietnam is not a tactical lesson. It's not "use different weapons" or "better counterinsurgency strategy" or "more local political work." The lesson is: you cannot impose your order on people who reject it, no matter how much firepower you have. That lesson cannot be incorporated into imperial policy. Because imperial policy is the project of imposing your order on people regardless of their consent. If you accept the lesson of Vietnam fully, you have to give up empire. And they are not prepared to give up empire. So instead they relearned it. In Iraq. In Afghanistan. In every proxy war and covert intervention and sanctions regime that produced the opposite of what they intended. They keep relearning it. Vietnam keeps being right. The world keeps watching. And every time the helicopters lift off another embassy roof, the ghost of Saigon 1975 is there in the archive, saying: We tried to warn you. Vietnam tried to warn you. You just wouldn't listen.

  705325221811K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Keep going