Back to @nu_online's profile

NU Online engagement report

@nu_online - 860K followers on X

Measured over 120 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 860K followers
Per impression
0.224%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 860K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 120 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0.224% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.156% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 120 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 191 interactions, about 64x its own typical post.

Measured over 120 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NU Online's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, NU Online sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 177 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 202664x their median

    Greg Barton: NU lebih bermanfaat jika tetap mandiri dari kekuasaan. Kemandirian penting agar NU bisa jadi penyeimbang bagi pemerintah. https://t.co/9HyS67WQIP https://t.co/5NzLY5Z9hC

    15235048.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202614x their median

    Alissa Wahid: AD/ART untuk kepentingan jangka panjang, bukan pertimbangan calon ketum. Lima caketum dorong pemilihan lewat AHWA. https://t.co/NGmKCZtR2y https://t.co/5RXu2KTDSm

    347105.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202612x their median

    Sidang Pleno Muktamar Ke-35 NU sepakati Ketum PBNU dipilih lewat AHWA. Keputusan diambil via voting tertutup dengan 401 suara setuju. https://t.co/Txj1p2Xg2I https://t.co/Aa2com9uLJ

    2542514K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202612x their median

    Alissa Wahid menegaskan bahwa kandidat ketua umum tak berhak untuk mengatur mekanisme pemilihan melalui Ahwa ataupun voting. https://t.co/9kfdIacNsE https://t.co/TKcmyvMirv

    269102.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.3x their median

    Greg Barton menghadiri Muktamar Ke-35 NU di Pesantren Tambakberas, Jombang, Jawa Timur. https://t.co/5jTYkbRlnu https://t.co/PzeGJbtDQt

    174102.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.7x their median

    Kiai Zulfa menyebut alasan lima bakal calon ketum PBNU menyepakati pemilihan ketum melalui Ahwa. https://t.co/vOBHAqZ9cb https://t.co/TfFNk2PyMg

    162205.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.3x their median

    Penggunaan anggaran pendidikan untuk MBG dalam putusan Bahtsul Masail Qanuniyah Muktamar Ke-35 NU harus dihentikan pada tahun 2027 sesuai putusan MK. https://t.co/8VueSQOaTV https://t.co/T2ESmqMXFP

    154001.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.0x their median

    Muktamar Ke-35 NU resmi mengesahkan Peta Jalan NU Digdaya 2050. Strategi jangka panjang ini berlandaskan penguatan ideologi Aswaja an-Nahdliyyah. https://t.co/rRIQQO9NYd https://t.co/5IjpMm0BHa

    124024.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20265.3x their median

    Ketua PCNU Jombang, KH Fahmi Amrullah Hadzik atua Gus Fahmi menilai Ketua Umum PBNU terpilih masa khidmah 2026–2031, KH Abdul Hakim Mahfudz sebagai sosok pimpinan yang humble. https://t.co/VP8Mz0bSYe https://t.co/SQoXegGvJZ

    132013.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.0x their median

    Gus Mus menegaskan bahwa pesantren bukan sekadar tempat untuk menyebarkan ilmu, tetapi juga pendidikan karakter. https://t.co/MnRgD93ZTo https://t.co/wKWzeCfU52

    132001.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 860K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 120 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0.224% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.156% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 120 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 191 interactions, about 64x its own typical post.

What is NU Online's engagement rate on X?
NU Online (@nu_online) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 120 original posts from the last 30 days against 859,520 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, NU Online sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nu_online have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @nu_online post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going